On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On the negative side, gobject-introspection cross compilation still sounds
like a mess
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592311
I worked on that code for a while at litl. Probably the best bet is
to not try
At the time, the android NDK was rather eccentric, which made
cross-compilation needlessly difficult. And the GTK stack is very
deep, there are a lot of dependencies. My understanding is that the
NDK has been improved since then, and is a little more compatible. I
wouldn't say speed is the main
the changes.
Gonzalo
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:25 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.orgwrote:
I did quite a bit of work on the Wikipedia activity this weekend
(related to an HTML port I was working on). I've pushed a set of patches
to:
https://github.com/cscott/wikiserver
based
I did quite a bit of work on the Wikipedia activity this weekend (related
to an HTML port I was working on). I've pushed a set of patches to:
https://github.com/cscott/wikiserver
based on the latest version at
ssh://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/wikiserver
Full list of patches is at the end of
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
* Both firefox and chrome extensions have good messaging mechanisms
between content and extension that we could use. We would have the
issue to turn a full browser into a chromeless sugar activity though.
For what
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin
moku...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, January 30, 2013 4:26 pm, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote:
* What we are doing here is still heavily experimental. I don't think we
know exactly where we are going yet, just trying to find out. I
At the risk of diverting you guys from your good work, let me add a few
related thoughts:
1) I think the core of this new API focus should be on the question:
what are the essential parts of the Sugar experience? I would like these
roughly as follows (you may have other ideas):
a) the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Any reason to prefer Firefox over Webkit?
Firefox/Android has made great strides recently, and is a much more
friendly environment for building add-ons. Chrome Web Apps are rather
limited in comparison (no full screen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
we are still at the very beginning but development is going fast. It
would be awesome to have activity authors step in as soon as possible,
so that we can add stuff as needed and get early feedback. If you want
Presumably with the standard multi-touch X support, which is landing
in Linux all over. That's how the XO-3 worked, at least, although
that was traditional capacitive touch; I don't think there's an actual
Neonode driver in existence anywhere yet.
--scott
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Bert
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
If you find non obvious icons, can report to try to improve.
May be adults have problems with icons, but kids don't,
just see a kid playing in any internet site.
These icons become much more problematic on a touch
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Michael Stone
michael.r.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/11, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
I was playing with Sugar collaboration between my XO-1.75 and my
crazy-nephew's XO-1.5 over the weekend. We wanted to play together,
but it was hard to find
I was playing with Sugar collaboration between my XO-1.75 and my
crazy-nephew's XO-1.5 over the weekend. We wanted to play together,
but it was hard to find which activities would let us do so.
What if we added a small badge (perhaps the ring of dots used to
switch an activity from 'private' to
I'm trying not to open the can of worms which is how should we best
implement collaboration. In this thread, let's just concentrate on
how do we discover collaborative activities when we're playing with
our friends?
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
Are any of the public collaboration servers still up?
I worked my way pretty far down
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community_Jabber_servers without finding
a server that would let me register. I am using an XO-1.75 build, so
perhaps collaboration is just busted in this build? If someone could
Click-to-translate would be very attractive as well.
--scott
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Tony Anderson tony_ander...@usa.net wrote:
Hi,
The OLE Nepal library on the school server includes wiktionary. However, I
think the dictionary would have to be small enough to keep on the internal
Just to reinforce a few points which maybe might not be clear to
people who haven't played with the new hardware:
1) the switch point is set that *you cannot tell when we turn the
backlight off*. Ie, the threshold is so high that by the time we turn
it off, you couldn't never have told whether
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:16 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
Current version on the cscott-gtk3 branch works on GTK3. Some functionality
might be missing: I've just discovered a bug in the gir bindings
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
(1) Maybe release this version (cairo) and make 124 the gtk-3 rebased
on your patches.
This is probably worth doing. At the very least it will make it
easier for testers to separate your bugs from mine. ;-)
--scott
I'm rebased on top of mainline now, staged at the usual place. I'll
continue working on getting the GTK3 functional while leaving GTK2
operation unchanged.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
I'll do some testing; I plan to make the next release based on this
work. May as well get these bits into the field.
I'm mostly just concerned that future patches base off the converted
source and use the new
On Thursday, November 10, 2011, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
I'll do some testing; I plan to make the next release based on this
work. May as well get these bits into the field.
I'm mostly just
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:27 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I keep rebasing based on your HEAD, we just need to choose one of
those rebases and then continue development from that point. I'll try
to do
I keep rebasing based on your HEAD, we just need to choose one of
those rebases and then continue development from that point. I'll try
to do another rebase tonight.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
I've been pushing my work to
http://git.sugarlabs.org/~walter/turtleart/walters-gtk3/commits/cscotts-gtk3
I'll rebase to the latest cairo bits. (It might be best to continue
working with HEAD of my branch, since it runs fine on gtk2 and will
minimize unnecessary patch conflicts.) It's also a
Is there any way to start a new document once you're in the activity?
--Scott
On Saturday, November 5, 2011, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
G'day Adam,
The holding down of the alt key in the activity view was
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
- self._view.set_flags(gtk.CAN_DEFAULT | gtk.CAN_FOCUS)
+ # TODO
+ #self._view.set_flags(Gtk.CAN_DEFAULT | Gtk.CAN_FOCUS)
This one I think I can help with. Try:
self._view.set_can_focus(True)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
While there is still a bit of fine-tuning/optimizing to do, I think
the basics are in place. We should coordinate our efforts in the gtk-2
- gtk-3 efforts.
I'll start by rebasing my GTK3 changes on top of your
Walter -- is the source code for the cairo-ized version available? I
made a decent start at GTK3-izing TurtleArt
(http://git.sugarlabs.org/~cscott/turtleart/cscott-gtk3/commits/gtk3)
and the missing piece is to replace a lot of GdkPixmap stuff with
cairo calls. If that code is already written,
The big change moving to GTK3 is gobject-introspection. I'm not aware
of any plans to change how scripting language bindings are done in the
future, so that part of the sugar port should be future-proof.
Other things like removing hippo-canvas are also future-proof --
there's no chance that any
Sorry, I haven't read *all* of the linked documents, but...
Congrats on getting a minimal GTK3 port running so quickly! That's
very impressive.
I'd originally thought that refactoring the Sugar API into more
independent modules would be a necessary part of the effort, just to
be able to do a
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:11 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I'd originally thought that refactoring the Sugar API into more
independent modules would be a necessary part of the effort, just to
be able to do
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 14 June 2011 21:35, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Would a skinned version of Firefox Mobile work for what is needed?
No, as we need collaboration, journal access, etc. But (I didn't
include this argument as I
There's both a pattern and an anti-pattern here, and I saw both during
my OLPC v1 days, circa 2008. There were certain features that we
were assured had a brilliant and complicated design that was just
waiting to be implemented and the implementer never got around to
either documenting the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I've posted a four week plan for XO-3 software exploration at
http://cananian.livejournal.com/62667.html
Briefly:
April 4-8: Android
April 11
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fsfe.org/projects/gplv3/europe-gplv3-conference.en.html
http://fsfe.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript.en.html
see question 6b from this QA from the 3rd International GPLv3
Conference (Barcelona, June 22-23,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
By updating to the GPLv3, we make a clear political statement that
commercial usage is ok, but our software must always remain free for
users to use, study, share *and* modify.
1) I'm not interested in using Sugar
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
- What's the upside?
- At what point do we say hey, this has scant upside, and negative
controversy around it, let's spend our time in productive things
instead?
This is the crux of my objection as well. I
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
Really? By moving to GPLv3 your removing the ability to use GPLv2
which is by definition a re-license
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Q: Do we need to ask the permission of all copyright holders?
A: No, we'll take advantage of the or any later version clause in the
current license. We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
This isn't
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Isn't this exactly what I wrote?
No, you wrote:
Q: How is the actual license change done?
A: We need to replace the COPYING file in the source code and update the
headers of all source files. This operation can easily
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
(Ironically, moving to GPLv3 is taking freedoms *away* from users of
Sugar).
Which freedoms are being taken away from the users of Sugar?
You are taking away the right to distribute Sugar under the GPLv2.
--scott
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I've posted a four week plan for XO-3 software exploration at
http://cananian.livejournal.com/62667.html
Briefly:
April 4-8: Android
Report on first week's work now at: http://cananian.livejournal.com/62756.html
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
PCs and Linux machines yes. But... there still lots of issues with Macs and
so far it does not work with the older G4 Power PC Macs (EToys
I've posted a four week plan for XO-3 software exploration at
http://cananian.livejournal.com/62667.html
Briefly:
April 4-8: Android
April 11-15: Chrome/ChromeOS/NativeClient
April 18-22: Get down dirty with mesh
April 25-29: Pulling legacy Sugar codebase into the
GTK3/g-o-i/touch-interface
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote:
When can we look forward to a similar exploration of hardware topics?
Hardware stuff is being discussed actively internally for XO-3.
Unfortunately, I can't say anything specific about it yet. But I am
pretty excited.
As
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu wrote:
Please ensure that, in *audio* recording mode, any video display (including
an oscilloscope-style display) does not cause glitches in the audio. (This
was an apparent problem in earlier versions.) Of course, the surest
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Just in case people are wondering: this patch does only affect internal
handling. The nick name that is visible in the UI (neighborhood view) is not
affected by the limiting. It will be displayed in full length.
And
What about just closing the excess activities? Why make the kids do more
work?
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
2011/3/8 Bastien b...@altern.org
C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org writes:
What about just closing the excess activities? Why make the kids do
more work?
Maybe with a warning first?
Maybe for backwards-compatibility, but child-friendly activities should be
able to save and close
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:53 -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
(oh, and the .zip file already has a checksum, it's not clear why
you'd need another one.)
Ah, cool... but I guess it's not a cryptographically secure one
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:43 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I'm suggesting that you work on reducing the time commitment, rather
than dilute the responsibility.
(Christoph's suggestion seems a useful step in that direction.)
--scott
--
( http
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
A committee-of-three with people like Gary, Martin, and Walter on it [...]
[Another orthogonal issue:]
I like and respect Gary, Martin, and Walter, and I think I'd have no
trouble convincing them of any UI change I'd wish
[more thoughts, again apologies for not making these shorter]
Failing a good candidate, I think do no harm should be the motto --
concentrate on the (many!) design-related tasks which *don't* involve
making design decisions. Briefly: organizing/maintaining the specs,
collecting/collating issues
I've said all I need to say, time to hear from other people.
We'll know we've been successful when the new updated version of the
Sugar HIG comes out.
Until then, I guess just keep on pounding that big red button at 6
month intervals.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Also, not sure if https should dramatically increase amount of traffic,
anyway could be check both instances:
http://chat.sugarlabs.org:9090/
https://chat.sugarlabs.org:9091/
It's not traffic, it's the number of
Random thoughts, not terribly connected:
1) agree with developers != designers. It's like developers !=
release managers. We developers can often play at being a designer
(or a release manager), but we've got bad tendencies that sneak in,
just because we know too much or know what's hard or
(apologies for not having the time to make these messages shorter)
Another way of thinking of this problem might be as civics-style
separation of powers.
Given that the problem is (simplified) UX design compromised by
developers (wrong target users, implementing the easiest thing,
whatever) --
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 07:23 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
You can try microformat ASLO updater from
http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/services/micro-format.php?name=fructose
Nice! I'm not sure about the size in
(oh, and the .zip file already has a checksum, it's not clear why
you'd need another one.)
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
It just seems like sugar-jhbuild/sugar-emulator should have its own
user, then. I bet Michael Stone could help you out there.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
FWIW, I greatly prefer continuations of parentheses-enclosed
expressions to be aligned with the start paren. Which also happens to
be emacs' default, for Python as well as c-mode.
gratuitous-use-of-religion
What crazy editor are you using which doesn't support this?
/gratuitous-use-of-religion
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de
wrote:
In general I would do what the spec says if there is no good reason not to
[1]. The example they have does not really handle all the cases, though.
Neither pep8 nor pylint does favor any formatting. So I guess we are a
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
I hope there's documentation on the wiki for activity authors.
(Ideally at the level of detail of PEP386.) There's certainly not
source code documentation at any sufficient level of detail.
--scott
This [1] will
I hope there's documentation on the wiki for activity authors.
(Ideally at the level of detail of PEP386.) There's certainly not
source code documentation at any sufficient level of detail.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
I don't think you need to do any studies about whether kids want to
customize their computers. This has been a constant message from
deployments since day 1. The first thing kids did with the very first
XOs fielded was slap stickers all over them to customize them.
Unfortunately, kids have no
I'm not certain that editing the existing gtkrc will be sufficient
(although it would certainly be a good start). As my history briefly
explained, Sugar was not designed to be 'colored' in the sorts of ways
a kid might want. (We might care whether the text/icons are easily
readable; they might
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Here's a mockup image using a blurred drop shadow for the icons and a simple
wood texture desktop, yes it looks rather pretty, but it would consume
perhaps 10% of memory on an XO-1, redraws and switching views would
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
I have been giving the patches another go and made some smaller fixes for
error handling. I have tested them as well to make sure there are no
regressions. I give them my ok.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 4 October 2010 15:27, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
What do others think about this approach? Packagers?
A clearer way to discuss this would be to just send a patch. That way
there is no doubt over the details
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Then I plan to ignore the customization when I compute the order.
So why is it there?
b) use the debian version numbering system *exactly*. It has been
shown to work in the real world, and it is well documented. The
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Initially, I advocated strongly for something with the expresiveness
of dpkg's versioning. However, that's wrong. We need to use a clear
_subset_ of what dpkg, rpm, portage(... etc) can do, so the distro
packager
If you're going to use something other than simple integers, I suggest either:
a) a string of dotted integers. You should *always* be able to
subdivide a release if necessary.
Strings like peru belong (in my opinion) in release notes or the
name of the activity or anywhere else. They don't tell
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Because of this specific commit, file transfers have been broken since
early this year and it's obvious that this code wasn't tested at all:
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/commits/11828796
Given
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
(3) even with the above resolved, we have arguably too little control
over the home view, both in terns of what appears -- several requests
have been made for the ability to have views of multiple collections:
e.g.,
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Christian Marc Schmidt
christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Any pattern will eventually run out of space. A space-filling curve
(Peano curve) might be interesting. There is an orthogonal
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
There's no reason to have both a filename and a dbus-like name for the
same thing. The former must already be unique on both distribution sites
and in the Activities directory.
I claim we should be using the dbus-like
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
The bundle base name (e.g Record) should be unique by itself, because
you can't have two directories named Record.activity in your
activities directory.
This is, IMO, a bug. The directory should really be named after
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:21 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
This is a nicely decentralized mechanism for choosing identifiers
which are guaranteed by construction never to conflict.
It is indeed a simple and nice
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:27 AM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
patch review process and (b) loosing patches. If a patch is a
solution to a problem it is not necessary to discuss the problem and
if it is the patch submitters responsibility to track the patch the
need for a
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:18 PM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it preferable to worry about potentially alienating new members
because their patches 'might' be ignored or is preferable to worry
about the existing patches which deployments have written but have
given up trying to
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
NetworkManager used to call ntpdate when it setup a connection. Was that an
OLPC addition?
Yes, although it's now present in litl's software builds as well.
We figured out that the ntp package has never been present
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:18:04AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
Bernie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:02 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
I think you are missing an important requirement: installation without
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
- Ideally something (Gnome I assume?) should trigger the keyboard overlay
when you focus on a text field, perhaps with some hints about what the
'return' key behaviour should do (or expose a tab key as that is
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 29-06-2010 a las 02:49 +0100, Gary Martin escribió:
Here's a few more misc. plays around school building shape.
Maybe I'm being too
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
El Sat, 26-06-2010 a las 23:07 -0400, Michael Stone escribió:
* whose name is URL-encoded with spaces encoded as pluses
Why pluses?
Because they're nicer than %20 and python provides urllib.quote_plus?
Can't we
It might also be worth thinking about how this would play out in Squeak/Etoys.
See in particular:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Smalltalk_Development_on_XO#Submit_your_changes
--scott attempting to learn from the community
ps. as bert's doing the only multitouch work (that I know of) I've
given
I don't know about RH, but @ litl we're using all-introspected
bindings w/ a distro based on Ubuntu Hardy. So backporting
shouldn't be too painful, really.
(Of course, we're not using the python introspection, so you might
have other troubles there.)
+1 on introspection in general. Hopefully
As far as I know, you could use fuse-mounted olpcfs to store the
journal files, and obtain this space savings (which is technically
known as deduplication) with no extra effort. You could also store
the files in git for the same effect.
--scott
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Frederick Grose
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
I'm looking for a musical keyboard device (black and white keys like
on a piano) that plugs into USB on a XO and allows one to play music
via TamTam. Does such a device exist? If so, pointers?
Well, I don't know if any such
Ananian
* added 189 comments to bugs.
* closed 14 bugs.
* reported 41 bugs.
* gathered 12 points.
--- eof ---
--- Launchpad says: ---
This is a summary of the Launchpad karma earned by C. Scott Ananian,
organized by activity type.
Bug Management 179
Total karma: 179
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Bobby Powers bobbypow...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote surf a while ago, and it was quite an easy port. In fact, the
demo browser for pywebkitgtk was (at least at one point) based on
browse. I did most of the work in a day and a half, but ran into
problems with
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:56 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
There are also gir bindings for webkit (in webkit's trunk), so it
might be worth investigating their completeness, especially since
pywebkitgtk seems to be unmaintained, as Sayamindu pointed out.
I believe we use
Sorry, Sascha, didn't mean for the attack to seem personal. And
Martin, I'm not sure NetworkManager is really the right tool for your
(server) job. NetworkManager's goal in life is dynamic roaming, not
static setups.
I'm not necessarily defending NM: lord knows I wish it had better docs
and a
On Monday, April 26, 2010, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:54 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I am failing to resist responding to this troll.
Dbus access from the command line is fairly good, and NM supports a
number of static data files for configuration if that's
Replying to quoted text is hard from my phone; bear with me.
On Monday, April 26, 2010, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:54:13PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
and NM supports a number of static data files for configuration if that's
what you
I am failing to resist responding to this troll.
Dbus access from the command line is fairly good, and NM supports a
number of static data files for configuration if that's what you want
yo do. Fear not, scriptability of Unix systems is, if anything,
*increasing*, as there are now powerful ways
FWIW, at litl we are switching from a xulrunner-based brower to a
chromium-based browser. We are seeing a big performance improvement,
plus it's making it easier for us to implement plugin isolation and
better memory management (unloading pages which are not foregrounded,
etc).
YMMV, and it's
Clear network settings does have other uses, even in the absence of
bugs: you may want to remove a network from being autoselected, or
remove a password for a home network before lending your device to
someone. In the absence of a per-connection editor (like nm-applet
has), clear network settings
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:49 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I think I convinced myself that network manager was the right place to
make the patch, because you want to reuse NM's list/order
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
