This email is long overdue.
As you might have noticed, I haven't contributed to Browse/Sugar in a
long time. It was partly frustration with the technologies
(GTK3/introspection migration, I hate you), partly lack of money; but
mostly it was lack of spare time.
I still don't have any more free tim
Surf is simply not ready, and broken in many ways. I haven't had time
to work on it, or Browse for that matter.
Also, a fully working Surf requires moving to pygobject-introspection
(in the whole of sugar-toolkit), which might require moving to gtk3 as
well.
On 16 September 2011 04:28, Thomas C G
It's likely that those libraries already exist on your machine, but
with slightly different names. You could install them, too.
Try making symlinks in the chromium dir to the real libs.
On 10 August 2011 10:23, Basanta Shrestha wrote:
> Hi,
> I am looking to install chromium on my XO. Recently I
On 24 June 2011 15:13, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2011, at 13:08, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>>> I would like to see a lot of experimentation with html activities
>>> outside the platform before we even consider integrating. There is
>>> just too much
On 24 June 2011 14:10, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 24 June 2011 13:08, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>> Just nitpicking, but gtk2/pygi is a perfectly good option as well, and
>> it may even work with sugar-toolkit (depending on the status of
>> python-gobject and sugar-toolkit
On 22 June 2011 12:54, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On 21 June 2011 23:23, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> 2. In order to get Browse, Help and Wikipedia up and running on
>> webkit, do you see the need for a hulahop equivalent? Or some kind of
>> sugar-level web widget abstraction? Or just direct calls i
On 14 June 2011 20:58, Daniel Drake wrote:
> 2. What is the state of Surf?
> This is the existing webkit-based browser for Sugar. Does it work
> well? Is it reliable? What are the gaping holes?
It works reasonably well. I couldn't implement cookies for example,
because that requires libsoup bindi
On 23 May 2011 17:46, Rafael Ortiz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>>
>> I gave you commit and review rights. Feel free to commit the two
>> patches yourself, removing me as a bottleneck.
>>
>
> Ok Thanks Lucian, a
I gave you commit and review rights. Feel free to commit the two
patches yourself, removing me as a bottleneck.
On 23 May 2011 17:14, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> Looks good, although it'd be nice at some point for Sugar itself to
> manage force closes better.
>
> Wouldn't it b
Looks good, although it'd be nice at some point for Sugar itself to
manage force closes better.
Wouldn't it be better if I gave you commit rights on mainline instead?
On 23 May 2011 16:30, Rafael Ortiz wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Sascha Silbe
> wrote:
>>
>> sugar.activity.act
On 18 May 2011 16:00, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Art Hunkins wrote:
>> > Yes, this is particularly crucial as there is no Browse in 0.92 Sugar.
>> > (I
>> > gather it is currently inoperable.) Thus there i
On 28 March 2011 23:01, Anish Mangal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With time, as hardware gets more complex, software gets bloated up to
> use the excess processor cycles available. A part of it is the
> websites that get more content heavy, bulky and slow with time.
> Considering that the hardware on the XO-1
On 17 March 2011 16:45, Mike Rehner wrote:
> I'm a retired computer science teacher with a limited amount of python
> experience. About a month and a half ago I decided to volunteer about 8-12
> hours a week of time to Sugar Labs. Unfortunately Sugar Labs is using a
> software stack that I am not
I've reopened the ticket, feel free to post this log there.
I'll have a look.
On Wednesday, 23 February 2011 at 14:01, Daniel Castelo wrote:
> We have some problems using browse activity V120. We can't download files
> attached in gmail (apparently happen with many sites)
>
> The activity doesn
Thanks a lot for finding the time to do this, I've been much more busy
than anyone should be lately. It even took me 10 days to reply to this
:)
On 5 December 2010 12:41, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> From: Lucian Branescu Mihaila
>
> PDFs are working fine, EPub support is limited:
&
On 24 November 2010 17:52, Sameer Verma wrote:
> Saw this and instantly thought of Sugar being rendered in a browser.
> http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2010/11/23/gtk3-vs-html5/
Looks interesting. Solutions like this would help to deprecate X11.
Although for Sugar in a browser, you'd need a server
On 22 November 2010 12:02, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
> On 11/22/2010 03:04 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
>>
>> I propose we eliminate "co-maintainers" from Glucose[1] because they
>> reduce the responsibility and pressure of a sole maintainer.
>
> I see it the other way around. Reducing the pressure o
It's up to xulrunner (gecko) to support . What version of
xulrunner are you using?On Sunday, 21 November 2010 at 09:36, javed khan
wrote:i checked the html5 audio tag but it is not working, any patch for it___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On 11 November 2010 16:40, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 10:36 AM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>>
>> On 25 October 2010 09:25, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/25/2010 09:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 24
It's not just that. Your android phone has a lot of ram and a much faster
cpu than the xo 1.0. And its java runtime is engineered especially for low
memory usage.
The xo 1.5 is much better. And python and sugar will get better.
On 7 Nov 2010 21:08, "Tabitha Roder" wrote:
> Re memory usage - we
On 25 October 2010 09:25, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 09:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 06:51:15PM -0400, Lucian Branescu Mihaila wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-120.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 120 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila)
* fix error writing file if there are not a url in the location bar (Gonzalo
Odiard)
* Fix OLPC #6874 - Web activity uses gettext on file name
On 19 October 2010 17:50, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for personal reasons have to drastically reduce my involvement in the project.
>
> Will be leaving maintenance of my modules and unsubscribing from the
> mailing lists. My place on the board is vacant from now on and I'll be
> adding to the w
On 22 October 2010 12:44, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>>
>> On 22 October 2010 12:05, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> > Lucien:
>> > I have added the patches to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10364
>
On 22 October 2010 12:05, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Lucien:
> I have added the patches to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10364
> Can you review it?
Patch looks good, but it makes the toolbar extremely crowded. I'll
accept it for now, with the caveat of having a Browse toolbar overhaul
as soon as I ge
On 20 October 2010 19:13, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2010, at 22:42, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>
>> 2010/10/19 NoiseEHC :
>>> You could just make the new tab show the home url by default.
>>
>> It already does.
>
> LOL :D
>
> FWIW: I've not ye
2010/10/19 NoiseEHC :
> You could just make the new tab show the home url by default.
It already does.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks a lot.
I'll do a new release after I fix the tab close crash.
On 19 Oct 2010 14:41, "Gonzalo Odiard" wrote:
I have commited a patch to solve the problem when you quit from the activity
and there are not a valid url active.
Gonzalo
> > I have two interesting traces. Have not checked the
On 15 October 2010 17:15, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 12:30 AM, Lucian Branescu Mihaila wrote:
>>
>> == Source ==
>>
>>
>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-119.tar.bz2
>>
>> == News ==
>>
>&
On 14 October 2010 09:38, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Oct 13 12:45:09 +0200 2010:
>
>> when working on the issue in Read that the dpad keys do not work
>> directly when in ebook mode [1], I postulated that Read when it comes up
>> should always grab the fo
On 14 October 2010 19:47, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi Gonzalo,
>
> On 5 Oct 2010, at 20:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> Gary:
>> Here are the screenshots.
>> I comented a check of cairo version to add the tabs button.
>>
>> toolbar-browse-0.90.png and toolbar-browse-0.84.png are with the emulator
>>
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-119.tar.bz2
== News ==
This is a bugfix release.
* Release 119 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila)
* generate preview image for downloaded images (SL#1106) (Gonzalo Odiard)
* Fix history on resume. The code is a bit hacky
On 9 October 2010 15:28, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:08 +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>> > Who is the Read maintainer these days? AUTHORS still says Sayamindu,
>> > but AIUI he stopped working on Sugar stuff.
>>
>> Then I could probably u
On 9 October 2010 14:01, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Lucian Branescu's message of Tue Sep 28 22:34:01 +0200 2010:
>
>> Epub support is not complete, you can see epubs, but none of the
>> toolbars work. [...]
>
> FWIW, I'd much rather see a working, but stripped-down Read upstream
> and in
On 7 October 2010 21:54, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Ticket with the start of implementation:
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2425
>
> Gonzalo
I'm not sure which way would be best, but I would choose either a very
simple solution (just dotted numbers, no alphanumerics) or a
tried-and-tested solu
On 6 October 2010 20:19, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> [Moving this to sugar-devel as I don't see any need to keep it private]
>
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Oct 05 14:58:24 +0200 2010:
>
>> #1106 Browse: No preview in Journal for downloaded image
>> https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/pa
On 6 October 2010 15:26, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Oct 06 15:31:07 +0200 2010:
>
>> Hmm, Lucian was to quick.
>
> Hehe. No problem; I don't think this particular patch is going to
> matter when hunting down some issue and there's enough information
> in
On 6 October 2010 14:31, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 03:23 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
>> On 10/06/2010 03:20 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 13:57:20 +0200 2010:
>>>
see as well #2291 for more info. This one is important for 0.90.
>>
On 6 October 2010 14:20, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 13:57:20 +0200 2010:
>
>> see as well #2291 for more info. This one is important for 0.90.
>
> A bit more background information would be nice. A one-line summary
> of the analysis in #2291 (i.e. input vs. s
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-118.tar.bz2
== News ==
Mostly just translations.
* Release 118 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila)
* Commit from Sugar Labs: Translation System by user mschlager.: 29 of 30
messages translated (0 fuzzy). (Pootle daemon
On 29 September 2010 14:08, Gabriel Eirea wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm replying to the list for more feedback. Please see below.
>
> 2010/9/29 Lucian Branescu :
>> On 29 September 2010 13:24, Gabriel Eirea wrote:
>>> Hi Lucian:
>>>
>>> I've see
On 28 September 2010 21:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 09/28/2010 10:14 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 28 21:00:22 +0200
>> 2010:
>>
>>> Ok, Lucian just explained me the rationale behind the Fedora version.
>>> Version 79 is coming from the evin
Sorry for the vry long time I left this in patch purgatory. I haven't
had internet access for quite a while.
Sacha, thanks for picking it up.
On 15 Sep 2010 11:58, "Simon Schampijer" wrote:
Hi Gonzalo,
thanks for the new patch. Would be good to tell in a few words what you
did change to th
On 6 September 2010 16:53, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 06.09.2010, at 17:50, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 06 16:25:03 +0200 2010:
>>
>>> I would say, adding a button that brings you back to the defined default
>>> page would be a good addition. Th
On 6 September 2010 15:25, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can well imagine there had been several discussions about this before,
> even so a quick search of the archives did not reveal something:
>
> Deployment(s) have been asking how to go back to the home page (OLPC start
> page / Sugar Lab
You can't customise it, but you can offer a document to be viewed alongside
the python source. Check how Browse does it.
On 30 Aug 2010 22:13, "Erik Blankinship" wrote:
How do you customize what is shown when "view source" is selected for an
activity?
On 25 August 2010 19:44, samir menon wrote:
> So I have hearing a lot about Google Summer of Code on the mailing list
> (specifically,, Dinko Galetic's project!) What happens when they finish
> their project? Do the projects (read: Dinko's project) get submitted as a
> patch for the respective ac
On 25 August 2010 15:23, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> raised during the review of [1] some code was relying on Python 2.6
> (with open(COUNTRY_CODES_PATH) as codes_file:).
>
> Is it sane to switch to this Python version for the Sugar platform? More
> readings on what is new in 2.6 at [2]. Pyt
On 18 August 2010 03:06, Christoph Derndorfer
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>>
>> Afaict, this isn't a bug in Browse, but in sugar.activity.Activity. I
>> also can't find any evidence in the logs that it segfaults. I'
On 15 August 2010 15:38, wrote:
> HI all,
> When we start sugar-emulator in ubuntu , The title text in emulator window
> shows [Xephyr on 30.0].Now , after going through code and other resources
> what i deducted is that Xephyr is window/session manager which we uses to
> run sugar on Ubuntu.Now
On 15 August 2010 05:19, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sat, 14-08-2010 a las 12:28 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Would anyone dislike me calling myself "senior developer and system
>> administrator at Sugar Labs" in my CV or consider it inappropriate? If
>> so, what other description w
On 14 August 2010 07:01, Tabitha Roder wrote:
> On 12/08/2010, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
>
>> Okay, submitted the bug which should hit Sascha Silbe's inbox for moderation
>> right about now.
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2155
>
> We have this problem too with os300py and the "lavaspot" w
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>>
>> This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to
>> reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't
>> already.
>
> Should I file the bug with Sugar La
This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to
reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't
already.
> Cairo version:
>
> cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/__init__.py", lin
2010/8/10 NoiseEHC :
>
>> We used to do that, the problem is that we don't control our platform
>> as Google controls Android and you need to make sure that resources
>> that need to be specific of each child process aren't shared (dbus and
>> X connections, etc).
>>
>> I'm personally more interest
Yes, it is a bug.
It has been observed that under certain versions of cairo, Browse with tabs
crashes. V115 checks for this and disables tabs if such a version is
detected. It's possible that other versions of cairo are problematic, too.
Please attach Browse's log and report your cairo version, I
On 9 August 2010 14:44, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
>> Sugar has a similar mechanism. From the Low-level Activity API docs:
>>
>> org.laptop.Activity.SetActive(b: active)
>> Activate or passivate an activity. This is sent when switching activities,
>> there is only one active activity at a time, all others
On 9 August 2010 11:25, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 09.08.2010, at 01:21, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>>> As long as activities are saving and restoring properly it could be
>> made pretty much transparent to the user. Of course that's easier
>> said then done...
>>
>> Android has a whole mechanism f
On 8 August 2010 20:51, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:38, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>>>
>>> Imo a confirmation popup would become annoying very quickly. Also if the
>>> user refuses, the kernel will have soon to kill an activity, which is w
On 8 August 2010 20:33, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques wrote:
>> The idea of killing activities with the content closed seems ok but it would
>> probably be a good idea to have a way to opt out of it for some apps. I'm
>> thinking a PDF that may be left ope
Bugfix release, adds a missing tab icon.
Please test this and report back any issues with tabs, from functionality to
design.
Note: tabs will disable themselves if you have a version of cairo that would
crash Browse.
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Br
- keyboard shortcuts for back/forward/reload
- add CAcert
- user-visible tab support. Note that the tab support will disable itself if it
detects cairo v >= 1.08.10
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-116.tar.bz2
_
Thanks. Rebasing to 2.28 shouldn't be that hard, but 2.30 has had
major API changes, so it would have to be ported.
For now we've left Browse PDF support for later since we're having a
lot of trouble getting anything working in the first place
(pywebkitgtk issues, no libsoup python binding, etc.)
On 27 July 2010 23:57, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:21 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
>> This is a nicely decentralized mechanism for choosing identifiers
>> which are guaranteed by construction never to conflict.
>
> It is indeed a simple and nice scheme, but why is such u
Globulation 2 is a currently maintained project and offers a nice take
on resource management.
http://globulation2.org/wiki/Main_Page
On 25 July 2010 18:37, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sun, 25-07-2010 a las 02:25 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
>
>> Anyone else remember this?
>
> I played dozens
I've rebranded Browse-webkit to Surf-115.
http://people.sugarlabs.org/lucian/Surf-115.xo
On 22 July 2010 19:03, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> I was planning to simply pretend that Browse-webkit is a newer version
> of Surf. In a way it is, since they share some ancient git history :)
&g
e:
> On 22 Jul 2010, at 17:26, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>
>> If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
>> master. Would that be ok?
>
> Need a new svg icon, temp or otherwise? Happy to cook something up, similar
> to the old surf svg involvi
On 22 July 2010 17:49, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 22.07.2010, at 12:18, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of changing
>> the bundle_id of Browse-webkit from 'org.laptop.WebActivity' to
>> 'org.sugarlabs.WebActivity', to allow both Browse to
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
master. Would that be ok?
On 22 July 2010 17:24, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 12:18 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>> In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute
>
In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute it.
However, it is plagued with dependency issues. It requires pywebkitgtk
1.1.6 and webkitgtk 1.1.7, which aren't an option on fedora 11 without
breaking other things. pywebkitgtk has a bug
(http://code.google.com/p/pywebk
Could you please attach a patch against mainline master HEAD? (not
inline in the email)
Also, does it still crash?
On 1 July 2010 21:02, anishmangal2002 wrote:
> This patch adds support to create multiple tabbed windows
> in Browse. A tab may be added by either clicking the add tab
> ('+') icon
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> El Tue, 20-07-2010 a las 03:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
>>> rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
>>> we could use some testing.
>>>
>>> You
I've enabled epub view. It requires both python-lxml and
python-BeautifulSoup installed (for some reason) and none of the
toolbars work in epub view.
On 20 July 2010 16:51, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> Another feature that doesn't work is Table of Contents for pdfs that have it.
>
&
Another feature that doesn't work is Table of Contents for pdfs that have it.
On 20 July 2010 15:00, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> I've implemented copy and search. There may still be some loose ends
> somewhere and I haven't tested epubs at all.
>
> On 20 July 2010 05:24,
I've implemented copy and search. There may still be some loose ends
somewhere and I haven't tested epubs at all.
On 20 July 2010 05:24, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Lucian,
>
> Fab thanks. A git clone of your
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/git/read/evince-2-30.git now does the trick for
> testing in
rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
we could use some testing.
You can get it from here
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/mainline/trees/webkit
It requires pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 and webkitgtk 1.2.*.
Also, note that pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 in fedora (11 and 12
On 18 July 2010 18:54, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>> I've seen your merge request on
>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/inline-pdf.
>>
>> Since I've been working on Browse-webkit,
I've seen your merge request on
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/inline-pdf.
Since I've been working on Browse-webkit, I'd like to implement inline
PDFs for it as well. However, evince maintainers are very hostile to
browser plugins, NPAPI or otherwise
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/sho
Silbe and I are Browse maintainers now. So if erikos is ok with it,
you can pass ownership to either one of us.
On 18 July 2010 11:12, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Hello erikos,
>
> you're still marked the owner of the Browse project on
> git.sugarlabs.org.
>
> If you don't mind, I'll pass ownership
I'd like to add to that list:
- Saving web pages from browse/SSBs
If there's time, I'd like some designers' opinion on how it should look.
On 8 July 2010 11:49, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of Thu Jul 08 09:13:23 + 2010:
>
>> > It would be great to hold Design Te
I was thinking that google groups deals great with two views on the
same discussion (forum-like comments and ml). Could something like
that be done for trac? Would it be a good idea?
On 6 July 2010 09:07, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 02:47 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On 07/01/2010 08:32
I'm not sure it's a good idea to merge this if it causes Browse (vital
app) to occasionally crash on SoaS (very popular Sugar environment).
At the very least, the tabs feature should be disabled if that certain
version of cairo is detected.
Also, it would be more convenient if you put your work in
I think it would be very useful if the datastore were less opaque to
regular tools. Especially as a developer, I find the Journal sometimes
gets in the way and going around it should be easier.
Related to the Gnome thread, this sort of work might help in making
Sugar impervious to Gnome damage, or
Keep in mind that mp3 already is a lossy codec. If you convert from
mp3 to ogg, you'll be losing a lot of quality. Usually you should only
convert from a lossless coded (like flac) to a lossy one (mp3/ogg).
I think you can try mencoder to encode between mp3 and ogg.
On 26 June 2010 09:28, javed k
Newer versions of Browse have support for tabs, but there is no UI
element to create more tabs. However, windows created from JavaScript
will appear as tabs.
Not sure about alert, you might just have a really old Browse. What
version is it?
On 25 June 2010 19:32, Dan Healy wrote:
> I have a brow
I think all activities should have "Report bug" on the toolbar
somewhere. And of course a system in place on the other end, perhaps
email-to-trac?
On 22 June 2010 14:25, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:07:50PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:39:46AM -0
The way I see it, activities can't really use PyGI until it's a sugar
dependency. The sooner it is available as a dependency on all relevant
platforms (debian being one of them), the sooner important things like
Browse can start using it.
So, how about making some packages for all relevant platfor
ll of Browse's features to work with pywebkitgtk.
I've also looked at webkitgtk+'s API and I'm confident that switching
to PyGI will be quite easy, mostly just renaming things.
On 16 June 2010 11:48, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> Unfortunately, that doesn't solve any of my
+1
PyGI as a working dependency would make Browse work somewhat easier
and would assure Browse's future.
On 16 June 2010 10:27, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anybody has thoughts about the convenience (or not) of making Sugar
> depend on the introspection stack in GNOME 3.0?
>
> The biggest prac
ction layer)
is proving increasingly hard to write. I will give it a few more days, but
if I can't figure out a clean way to wrab both hulahop and pywebkitgtk I'll
drop hulahop entirely and let any future switching back to hulahop rely on
git.
On 16 Jun 2010 11:07, "Tomeu Vizoso&quo
Afaik, hulahop's WebView has a method do_setup, which is a convention
b the initial hulahop devs for a method to be called after the page
has loaded.
On 10 June 2010 13:36, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 23:46 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard escribió:
>> SocialCalc depends of hulahop.
>
On 10 June 2010 04:28, Jameson Quinn wrote:
>
>
> 2010/6/9 Luke Faraone
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> > As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet,
>> > so it's not like we need to keep i
few utility functions, but very little is added to the base WebView
classes.
On 10 June 2010 01:11, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 13:30 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
>
>> After some debate on what exactly I should be doing, I've decided that
>>
On 8 June 2010 05:54, Michael Stone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release in
> a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves
> integrating. Here's my current list of, er... mostly unvetted rumors. :)
>
>
I'm not sure what this is and I don't really have the time to look into it atm.
Browse is in a difficult situation because hulahop, pywebkitgtk and
webkitgtk+PyGI all have hazy futures. Over the summer I'll try and get
Browse in a better situation (the plan so far is a thin abstraction
layer).
So
On 8 June 2010 15:01, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Luncian,
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>> I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective
>> engines.
>>
>> There are still 2 issues:
>> 1) Mozi
in a fully-working
Browse with SSB features in time for GSoC that also has a clear enough
future.
On 31 May 2010 13:41, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in
> #sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT
>
> On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso wr
Physics is amazing.
On 3 Jun 2010 16:27, "Hernan Pachas" wrote:
Hello all
I have a consultation, we need a "striking" activity to install in the XO.
That is striking? That calls the visual attention of the persons who look
at the XO.
Do you can please, send a list of striking activities to
Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in
#sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT
On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:58, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>> In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving
the browser engine situation in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/AbstractBrowser
My exams haven't finished yet (last one on Wednesday), so before I
start working, I want the opinion of people that use web e
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
