Re: Bifilar Again!

2000-10-23 Thread Sarah Edmondson-Jones
Hello John, I think, in the end, absolutely anything (or things) that cast a shadow(s) on any surface (plane or not) can be used to describe a sundial!! However, the markings get very complex. Agreed, (not to mention the maths)!! Thus, to answer your question, the two threads or edges

Re: Bifilar Again!

2000-10-21 Thread fer j. de vries
] To: sundial list sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:06 PM Subject: Bifilar Again! Many of you may remember a thread on this list in March of this year about the bifilar name. (I tried to look for it on the AstroArchive site but I could not do a search for titles

Re: Bifilar Again!

2000-10-21 Thread fer j. de vries
lat. 51:30 N long. 5:30 E - Original Message - From: Sarah Edmondson-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de; John Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 5:46 PM Subject: Re: Bifilar Again! Hello John et al, I'm still trying to come to grips

Re: Bifilar Again!

2000-10-21 Thread John Davis
Hi Claude, You wrote: The new BSS glossary does not even list the term, bifilar. This is not so - it is there under dial types, and reads: bifilar ~: invented in 1922 by Hugo Michnik in its horizontal form, although it can be on any plane. The time is indicated by the intersection on the

Re: Bifilar Again!

2000-10-21 Thread Sarah Edmondson-Jones
Hello John et al, I'm still trying to come to grips with the possibilities that bifilar dials offer. Is it necessary for the 'lines/wires/planes' that cast the shadow to be parallel with the dial plate? best wishes Sarah Edmondson-Jones

Bifilar Again!

2000-10-20 Thread Claude Hartman
Many of you may remember a thread on this list in March of this year about the bifilar name. (I tried to look for it on the AstroArchive site but I could not do a search for titles or keywords. The egroup site is much better: http://www.egroups.com/group/sundial) There seems to be continuing

Bifilar Again!

2000-10-20 Thread Wm. S. Maddux
Claude, et.al., Claude Hartman wrote: .. There seems to be continuing concern for the use of this name. As before, there seems to be no other reason to refer to these non-linear gnomons as bifilar other than the total lack of any better terminology! . I don't know that it

Re: Bifilar Again

2000-03-02 Thread Dave Bell
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Claude Hartman wrote: Another example was shown at the Reutte, Austria, sundial competition in 1998. This was submitted by Rafael Soler and called a Bi-Filar sundial. It marked time by the intersection of the shadow of a horizontal disk and its vertical support rod.