This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G.
(Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
admin at firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.l
n Java 1.6.0 on Debian Linux, i686.
>
Nothing obvious. Are you sure it was actually down? Or was it just
non-responsive?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20071024/2d0436ef/attachment.pgp>
t was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20071024/9dd6c356/attachment.pgp>
able
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20071024/3ab3681b/attachment.pgp>
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G.
(Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.linux.it
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 04:41, Harrison Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:50 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Please provide us your wrapper.log. What platform are you running the node
on?
> >
> > On Tuesday 23 October 2007 02:07, Harrison Smith wrote:
> > > If I don't use FProxy or
Freenet 0.7 build 1069 is now available. Please upgrade. This includes a fix
to a weak keys issue in our Diffie-Hellman code (including STS and JFK),
which apparently also affected Freenet 0.5 (we are not going to fix it in 0.5
as 0.5 is unmaintained, but if you want to send us a patch we will a
I'm currently running a node on a 10Mbit trunk w/ 10G of cache space. Do
you think it would be beneficial for those of us who have the resources
available to contribute them, even if it does result in ubernodes?
-Derek
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good
I'm currently running a node on a 10Mbit trunk w/ 10G of cache space. Do
you think it would be beneficial for those of us who have the resources
available to contribute them, even if it does result in ubernodes?
-Derek
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good
Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly
homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes?
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 06:00, [Anon] Anon User wrote:
>
> In Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It w
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G.
(Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.linux.it
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G.
(Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
admin at firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.l
12 matches
Mail list logo