Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^
I referred to the mail from Peter J. in the "Version 1179?" thread.
He said the temporary files bug could be fixed.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:54, Dennis Nezic
wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
some reason we get no online update
and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
works on Linux...
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:33, Ulrich Koepping wrote:
> I have the same problem as described in Bug ID
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
> like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
> I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
>
Yes had that
Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya
wrote:
> Volodya wrote:
>> bbackde at
Ok, thanks for your answer... update.CMD now downloaded 1178 (said it
was a new version, but I had 1178 before)
and since then update.CMD thinks I'm current enough. Still no online
update offering.
I keep waiting, maybe it works when 1180 is there...
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya
I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to
latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys.
Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately
: "Temporary files error: invalid block type".
I deleted the
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> > that it won't go away and
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> told if it
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^
You should be able to download the snapshot jar from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and
replace the one you're currently using.
Volodya wrote:
> bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
>> about this version via mailing list,
>> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
>> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my
bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
> about this version via mailing list,
> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
> mail that was
3 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it
to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node
Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not
acknowledging packets.
1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
it to us at the bug tracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/http://127.0.0.1:/?_CHECKED_HTTP_=https://bugs.freenetproject.org/or
at
[EMAIL
2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/
or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what
version of the node
Dear Supporters,
I am a total newbie in freenet. Every time I start freenet I get the alert that
my node lies behind a NAT-device or a Firewall and that I should forward my
port-Number 11833. After some discovery-attempts in the administration tool of
my router I found out that there is
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be
told if it
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
that it won't go away and is
Ok, thanks for your answer... update.CMD now downloaded 1178 (said it
was a new version, but I had 1178 before)
and since then update.CMD thinks I'm current enough. Still no online
update offering.
I keep waiting, maybe it works when 1180 is there...
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya [EMAIL
Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volodya wrote:
[EMAIL
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
Yes had that also with
I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to
latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys.
Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately
: Temporary files error: invalid block type.
I deleted the
This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
some reason we get no online update
and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
works on Linux...
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:33, Ulrich Koepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem as
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
some reason we get no online update
and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
works on Linux...
Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in
Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^
I referred to the mail from Peter J. in the Version 1179? thread.
He said the temporary files bug could be fixed.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:54, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^
You should be able to download the snapshot jar from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and
replace the one you're currently using.
26 matches
Mail list logo
