On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:58 AM, freenet free...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Nov 9, 2009, at 17:16:24 +0100, bimbek bimbek...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban
the poor
guy.
I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
Freenet is exactly what was being discussed. He wasn't looking for
support for illegal activities, he was looking for support for
Freenet, which he happened to be using in a way that in certain
countries is illegal. So should we refuse support to anyone asking for
help with freenet if their use of
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, urza9...@gmail.com wrote:
Freenet is exactly what was being discussed. He wasn't looking for
support for illegal activities, he was looking for support for
Freenet, which he happened to be using in a way that in certain
countries is illegal. So should we
If Freenet is probibited, something better will pop up, I think, the
development of the Internet never stops, and still smarter guys will show up?
Please stop this dialog, and go to the freenet message boards and continue -
thanks *laugh*
___
Support
On Nov 9, 2009, at 17:16:24 +0100, bimbek bimbek...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban
the poor
guy.
I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
court
would say that using freenet is illegal...
Did anyone catch
