Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Arne Babenhauserheide (2017-02-21 18:44:48 +0100) wrote: > Do I remember correctly that the bundler replicates the site as is — > with all its dangers to privacy? (Freenet provides heavy whitelist > filtering to protect its users from uploaded content). Sorry, but I do not know the software that

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: > Robert John Morton (2017-02-20 08:19:36 -0300) wrote: > >> Dear CENO team: >> >> An extremely worth-while and timely project. I wish you well. >> >> I think that the deliberate exclusion of sites from popular search engine >> listings is one of the worst forms

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Hi Ivan, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: > Hi Arne, thanks for the insights and the links. Please note that the > current CENO project is actually using Freenet as a signalling and > storage backend!`:)` It’s great to know that this is still the case! >> (I submitted a project plan for

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Hi, thanks for your advice! Maybe I should have mentioned that the current version of the project does use Freenet for signalling and storage, so we already enjoy these features from Freenet. The harder part will surely be dynamic or user-dependent content, along maybe privacy-preserving

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Arne Babenhauserheide (2017-02-20 22:12:59 +0100) wrote: > Hi Ivan, Dear eQualit.ie Hackers, > > Aside from the web-apps part, Freenet can already provide everything > you asked for. Hi Arne, thanks for the insights and the links. Please note that the current CENO project is actually using

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Robert John Morton (2017-02-20 08:19:36 -0300) wrote: > Dear CENO team: > > An extremely worth-while and timely project. I wish you well. > > I think that the deliberate exclusion of sites from popular search engine > listings is one of the worst forms of censorship on the Web. Perhaps the >

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer: > > 1. Content is available under censorship conditions, ideally even > after connection to the Internet has been completely cut for a > whole region. Try http://project-byzantium.org/ for inspiration. Maybe also https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns. Freenet can

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Hi Ivan, Dear eQualit.ie Hackers, > > Aside from the web-apps part, Freenet can already provide everything you > asked for. > > Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: >> 1. Content is available under censorship conditions, ideally

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Hi Ivan, Dear eQualit.ie Hackers, Aside from the web-apps part, Freenet can already provide everything you asked for. Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: > 1. Content is available under censorship conditions, ideally even > after connection to the Internet has been completely

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Dear CENO team: An extremely worth-while and timely project. I wish you well. I think that the deliberate exclusion of sites from popular search engine listings is one of the worst forms of censorship on the Web. Perhaps the only way to combat this is to create a search engine that has no