On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:09:42AM +0200, Newsbyte wrote:
We will have to wait on the real first precedent...but I think the legal status of
freenet and it's users is rather good. Technical imperfections, like the lack of an
extra layer of encryption on the storage seems rather a greater
On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:32, Toad wrote:
The weakness is insoluble. Unless nodes run 24x7 for LONG periods, and
encrypt the entire store with an ephemeral key, thus wiping it on
startup.
I thought it was a stated goal of freenet to make it impossible to
have this kind of breach without an
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 08:23:43PM -0400, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:32, Toad wrote:
The weakness is insoluble. Unless nodes run 24x7 for LONG periods, and
encrypt the entire store with an ephemeral key, thus wiping it on
startup.
I thought it was a stated goal of
Matthew Findley wrote:
Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work.
Oh, you were posting on your employer's time? I personally believe in
the presumed innocent until proven guilty, so rather than assuming
you guilty of misusing your work time for private activities, I'll
Paul wrote:
What country does respect freedoms? The US is getting to the point
where emgrating becomes a serious consideration for me.
I lived in Greece during the 1967-1974 dictatorship. Later I've
lived in England, in Germany, in Sweden and the Netherlands. Of all
these countries, Greece is the
On 5 Aug 2004, at 04:42, Matthew Findley wrote:
Let me put it this way.
When you all fire up your nodes you know there is a very strong
likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting illegal
material, correct?
So you know your computer will be doing something illegal and yet
choose to
; especially so if you had reason to believe
you were doing something illegal in the first place.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 7:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run a freenet node you know it's doing something illegal
No. I've already explained this to you. Short memory?
Do you get paid to post FUD?
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common
Can we continue this on chat? I would bounce all the messages there but
I don't know a quick way to bounce a message and reset the reply-to.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:25:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The USPS is a business (well not technically... but it's close enough to call it
that
then enough to prove you had knowledge that a crime is taking place.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: anonymity(NOT)
Importance
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: anonymity(NOT)
Importance: Low
Can we continue this on chat? I would bounce all the messages there but
I don't know a quick way to bounce a message and reset the reply-to.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:25:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The USPS
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I explained one does not need 100% certain knowledge of a crime
to fit the legal requirement of knowing. It only needs to be proven
that you had a good reason to suspect that it is so.
The very fact
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 03:38:35PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
miguel writes:
Just wondering... with all this encryption permeating Freenet
there remains a gaping hole through which the nazi's could saunter through
with their spy tools and legal bypasses to incriminate any and all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Derbyshire wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004 at 15:38, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Yes, it's trivial for Them to know whether someone runs a Freenet node or
not, but knowing what the user was doing with that node is an another
matter (assuming that the node is
What country does respect freedoms? The US is getting to the point
where emgrating becomes a serious consideration for me. I'm still
young, I don't have a stable job or faimly. I'd rather live somewhere
that I can be sure my future kids and myself will be free than live a
richer live in the US. Is
15 matches
Mail list logo
