-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
The real solution to browser history stealing is simply to use a
separate
browser for Freenet than the one you use for the wider web. We now warn
users
about
On Friday 23 January 2009 01:53, [Anon] Anon User wrote:
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
The real solution to browser history stealing is simply to use a
separate
browser for Freenet than the
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
There have been some question marks over whether it is possible to
load an image from an external domain and get a callback when it is
loaded - if so, it may be possible to time fetches of specific sites
from javascript on an
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Meaning running a web browser on a system with access to fproxy is
dangerous. I haven't tested this, maybe you'd like to?
I would imagine that the same problem exists on a system with access to
fcp? or telnet if it's enabled? Ie.
On Saturday 24 January 2009 17:41, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
There have been some question marks over whether it is possible to
load an image from an external domain and get a callback when it is
loaded - if so, it may be possible to
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We
should also warn about it in the README...
You mean the executable/jar can still be probed for on the filesystem?
Maybe. But it can't be done via the network interface, if
On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:18, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We
should also warn about it in the README...
You mean the executable/jar can still be probed for on the
h...@5fejudg2zdeqo-u4yoywc1zf4tgpwowlqcajvgcorv8 wrote:
I have a big problem with recent releases (after 1194).
Uploads crash. See this screenshot:
c...@c8~jdmdn0iz7tbkjmvmamcuqimfzkgqqjgpiofsabny,9GXBGEXt5v3UzVMEufgQTvvYtUBPwWWh
Vr5tOjYG9V8,AAIC--8/.jpg
Uploads stop before 100% and the
n any case.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090124/f5d926d9/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> There have been some question marks over whether it is possible to
> load an image from an external domain and get a callback when it is
> loaded - if so, it may be possible to time fetches of specific sites
> from javascript on an
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Meaning running a web browser on a system with access to fproxy is
> dangerous. I haven't tested this, maybe you'd like to?
I would imagine that the same problem exists on a system with access to
fcp? or telnet if it's enabled? Ie.
that, fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We should
also warn about it in the README...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090124/9390cdd5/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We
> should also warn about it in the README...
You mean the executable/jar can still be probed for on the filesystem?
Maybe. But it can't be done via the network interface,
can do it with iptables rules.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090124/cffdd3f1/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:10:57 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> herb at 5FeJUDg2ZdEqo-u4yoYWc1zF4tgPwOWlqcAJVGCoRv8 wrote:
>
> I have a big problem with recent releases (after 1194).
> Uploads crash. See this screenshot:
> CHK at
>
15 matches
Mail list logo