next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070305/73b6099d/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> In a nasty centralised way of course, but with the current state of
> technology and deployment ALL social networking is nasty centralized
> crap - partly because of NATs, partly because of business models, and
> partly becaus
___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
---
m, since it would
> generate the
> proper f2f network.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070305/f179a55c/attachment.pgp>
at. even using the refbot.py is heavy (my point of view)
> Any ideas on how using refbot.py could be made less heavy?
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070305/e438e469/attachment.html>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:22:20PM +, Volodya wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > In a nasty centralised way of course, but with the current state of
> > technology and deployment ALL social networking is nasty centralized
> > crap - partly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> In a nasty centralised way of course, but with the current state of
> technology and deployment ALL social networking is nasty centralized
> crap - partly because of NATs, partly because of business models, and
> partly becaus
Try again (get a new copy of the installer), nextgens fixed the installer.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:19:39PM -, Michael Garlick wrote:
> I've tried to install Freenet three times now.
>
> After "Setting Up Plug-Ins"
>
>
>
> The following is displayed:
>
>
>
> "Detecting tcp port avai
Brice Neant wrote:
> as 'feedback is the breakfast of champions - the one minute manager'
> here is some:
>
> freenet concept is great and thanks for bringing it to us
>
>
> the 0.7 freenet experience is pretty tricky to the user:
> good points:
> -WEB interfaces to config the freenet is really goo
In a nasty centralised way of course, but with the current state of
technology and deployment ALL social networking is nasty centralized
crap - partly because of NATs, partly because of business models, and
partly because nobody has got around to implementing good peer to peer
social networking sit
Hi there,
i used 'heavy' to describe the node update process a whole --> IRC
connections & VS auto-update from nodes to nodes (+ a web site
where people might catch/put their node id to get an entry point)
concerning your bot particularly,
well it is far better than manual update of cour
Brice Neant wrote:
> as 'feedback is the breakfast of champions - the one minute manager'
> here is some:
>
> freenet concept is great and thanks for bringing it to us
>
>
> the 0.7 freenet experience is pretty tricky to the user:
> good points:
> -WEB interfaces to config the freenet is really goo
12 matches
Mail list logo
