[freenet-support] commandline modify config

[anonymous freenet]

hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows.
reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain
times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big
big? is like 5k upload only.

sorry if you is receive this times two, i send before but no see.

also do you is no you got no archive any more here
http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/. you is need to go here
http://archives.freenetproject.org/list/support.en.html. but this page
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support is still tell
you go old page.

thanks to all people.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[freenet-support] commandline modify config

[anonymous freenet]

hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows.
reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain
times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big
big? is like 5k upload only.

sorry if you is receive this times two, i send before but no see.

also do you is no you got no archive any more here
http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/. you is need to go here
http://archives.freenetproject.org/list/support.en.html. but this page
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support is still tell
you go old page.

thanks to all people.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

[anonymous freenet user]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>
>
>--Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset=US-ASCII;
>   delsp=yes;
>   format=flowed
>
>Opennet is a high priority, but there are a few things we must do  
>first (such as sort out our load balancing issues, and decide on  
>exactly how opennet should be implemented).
>
>Ian.

Ok, That's understandable.
Is there any kind of roughly-hoped-for-date for deploying open-net?
I realize you can't nail down a date and say on x/y/z open-net will
activate.
I'm looking for some idea of how long it's expected to take in real-time.

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

[anonymous freenet user]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>
>
>--Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset=US-ASCII;
>   delsp=yes;
>   format=flowed
>
>Opennet is a high priority, but there are a few things we must do  
>first (such as sort out our load balancing issues, and decide on  
>exactly how opennet should be implemented).
>
>Ian.

Ok, That's understandable.
Is there any kind of roughly-hoped-for-date for deploying open-net?
I realize you can't nail down a date and say on x/y/z open-net will
activate.
I'm looking for some idea of how long it's expected to take in real-time.




___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>> >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>> >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=3Dpgp-sha1;
>> >protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"; boundary=3D"MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>> >Content-Disposition: inline
>>=20
>> personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
>> compatible
>
>It's more standards compliant.

Perhaps, but useless to programs that do not understand pgp-mime.  Sadly, I
lack the skills to add this capability to Jack B. Nymble and I am entirely
too stubborn to change software from what has worked for me for years, thus
your msgs are not verifyable to me at all.

>> >
>> >You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
>> >several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
>> >reset.
>>=20
>> This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
>> re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.
>
>Yes.
>>=20
>> On a related note...
>>=20
>> If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
>> I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
>> content back to the node that inserted it?
>
>0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are
>vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who
>are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7.
>Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys].
>
>Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant
>adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal
>betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace
>the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected
>to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation
>attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8).
>
>Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented
>yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that
>we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not
>authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed
>in the reasonably near future.
>

Thanks for the clarification.  That helps my decision of what to insert
where.

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?
>
>That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
>not before 1.0.
>
>0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
>updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
>simulations.
>
>Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
>few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

Ok, I should rephrase  

"until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated"



>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>>=20
>> I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
>> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
>> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
>--=20
>Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
>Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
>ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>Content-Description: Digital signature
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu
>E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU=
>=J7A9
>-END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support at freenetproject.org
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>> >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=3Dpgp-sha1;
>> >protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"; boundary=3D"MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>> >Content-Disposition: inline
>>=20
>> personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
>> compatible
>
>It's more standards compliant.

Perhaps, but useless to programs that do not understand pgp-mime.  Sadly, I
lack the skills to add this capability to Jack B. Nymble and I am entirely
too stubborn to change software from what has worked for me for years, thus
your msgs are not verifyable to me at all.

>> >
>> >You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
>> >several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
>> >reset.
>>=20
>> This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
>> re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.
>
>Yes.
>>=20
>> On a related note...
>>=20
>> If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
>> I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
>> content back to the node that inserted it?
>
>0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are
>vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who
>are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7.
>Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys].
>
>Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant
>adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal
>betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace
>the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected
>to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation
>attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8).
>
>Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented
>yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that
>we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not
>authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed
>in the reasonably near future.
>

Thanks for the clarification.  That helps my decision of what to insert
where.



___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?
>
>That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
>not before 1.0.
>
>0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
>updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
>simulations.
>
>Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
>few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

Ok, I should rephrase  

"until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated"



>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>>=20
>> I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
>> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
>> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
>--=20
>Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
>ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>Content-Description: Digital signature
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu
>E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU=
>=J7A9
>-END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support@freenetproject.org
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple  wrote:
>
>  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
> 
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
> 
> Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated
>in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there
>are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems,
>bugs and continual updates.
>
>Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
>  P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content
>on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a
>number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest
>media & content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users,
>including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.
> 
> Scruple
>  

I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
> 
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
> 
> Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated
>in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there
>are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems,
>bugs and continual updates.
>
>Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
>  P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content
>on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a
>number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest
>media & content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users,
>including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.
> 
> Scruple
>  

I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5




___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>Content-Disposition: inline

personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
compatible

>
>You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
>several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
>reset.

This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.

On a related note...

If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
content back to the node that inserted it?







___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>Content-Disposition: inline

personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
compatible

>
>You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
>several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
>reset.

This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.

On a related note...

If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
content back to the node that inserted it?