Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 07 June 2010 19:09:43 VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > As I understand it Chomsky defends his copyright quite vigorously (and > > earns a substantial amount of money from his work). Are you absolutely sure > > you have the right to distribute that file? > > Dear

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-07 Thread VolodyA! V Anarhist
Matthew Toseland wrote: As I understand it Chomsky defends his copyright quite vigorously (and earns a substantial amount of money from his work). Are you absolutely sure you have the right to distribute that file? Dear Matthew, I understand (while not 100% agree with) your reasons behind di

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 05 June 2010 04:45:55 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:54:42 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > > > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > >> Is it possible to expli

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:54:42 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > >> Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with > > >> GETCHK or GETCHKFIL

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with > >> GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think > >> these commands a

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread VolodyA! V Anarhist
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When insertin

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread VolodyA! V Anarhist
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When insertin

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or > GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands > are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) > > When inserting files via f

[freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When inserting files via fproxy, I think you have to explicitly decide whether to compress