Re: [pfSense Support] g_vfs_done():ad0a[WRITE(offset=28090368, length=8192)]error = 1

This should be gone from future versions. You will need to reflash since its not covered in the mini updates. Scott On 11/7/05, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have these in my logs as well with wraps randomly. Doesn't have to do > anything with wireless at all as I'm seeing these

AW: [pfSense Support] g_vfs_done():ad0a[WRITE(offset=28090368, length=8192)]error = 1

I have these in my logs as well with wraps randomly. Doesn't have to do anything with wireless at all as I'm seeing these even at systems without wireless from time to time. Never caused an issue for me either. Holger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailing list

http://forum.pfsense.org announced last week on this list, on the blog, and on the main website. Mojo Jojo wrote: I am always a bigger fan of forums, where do I find this forum? Of course, will take the PfSense help wherever it's offered :) I just think forums have more features, easier

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/LynnARoth.iso On 11/7/05, Mark Wass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Scott > > Is this iso still available? I also need a copy of it. I tried getting it > this morning but had no luck. > > Thanks > > > Mark > > Scott Ullrich wrote: > Please try http://www.pfsen

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

Hi Scott Is this iso still available? I also need a copy of it. I tried getting it this morning but had no luck. Thanks Mark Scott Ullrich wrote: Please try http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/LynnARoth.iso which includes the Dell patch. Scott On 11/7/05, Lynn A. Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

Do me a favor and reply back to the freebsd list and let them know that the patch worked and ask if someone can commit :P Scott On 11/7/05, Lynn A. Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That seemed to work great. The drive was found on boot and the > installer seemed to install fine. > > Thank you f

Re: [pfSense Support] g_vfs_done():ad0a[WRITE(offset=28090368, length=8192)]error = 1

I am seeing this as well. Its cosmetic from what I can tell. It's on my list to look at soon. Scott On 11/7/05, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been seeing the above message sporadically both on a WRAP and > RouterBoard > 200. They seem to appear only when a MiniPCI (At

[pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

That seemed to work great. The drive was found on boot and the installer seemed to install fine. Thank you for the very quick update. Lynn Scott Ullrich wrote: Please try http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/LynnARoth.iso which includes the Dell patch. Scott On 11/7/05, Lynn A. Roth <[EMAIL

[pfSense Support] g_vfs_done():ad0a[WRITE(offset=28090368, length=8192)]error = 1

Hi, I have been seeing the above message sporadically both on a WRAP and RouterBoard 200. They seem to appear only when a MiniPCI (Atheros) is installed and and activated. I have tried several CF cards and re flashed them (from a Windows Machine). A second WRAP, which does not have a MiniPCI card

AW: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailing list

http://forum.pfsense.com also linked from the homepage: http://pfsense.com/index.php?id=21   Holger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Mojo Jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2005 22:45An: support@pfsense.comBetreff: Re: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailin

Re: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailing list

I am always a bigger fan of forums, where do I find this forum?   Of course, will take the PfSense help wherever it's offered :)   I just think forums have more features, easier to use and I don't have to download and store a bunch of stuff I don't care about, instead I can browse the thread

AW: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

My IRC/forum nick is hoba. > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Barry Kiesz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2005 21:11 > An: support@pfsense.com > Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92 > > > This what I have and was able to reproduce this on

RE: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

This what I have and was able to reproduce this on 2 wrap boxes (same CF card though). I popped the CF card that had a pre.90 image on it and it booted on both wrap boards. WRAP.1E v1.09 640 KB Base Memory 130048 KB Extended Memory 512MB Kinston CF card pfSense-Embedded-0.92.img.bin.gz C:\Wra

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

Please try http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/LynnARoth.iso which includes the Dell patch. Scott On 11/7/05, Lynn A. Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submitted this problem to freebsd-current and got a patch back. Is it > possible for me to build a kernel that has this patch and integrate it

AW: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

I have been using all versions of pfsense at my wrap with 4 nics (3 on board, 1 atheros). I noticed random reboots on applying wlan settings with pre .90 versions. This stopped with .90 and never came back. Actually I have been running .90, .90a, .92 (which was pulled due some issues) and I'm pr

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

I've already started integrating the patch. Look for it in a future release. On 11/7/05, Lynn A. Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submitted this problem to freebsd-current and got a patch back. Is it > possible for me to build a kernel that has this patch and integrate it > into the pfSens

[pfSense Support] Re: Trouble installing to Dell PowerEdge 850

I submitted this problem to freebsd-current and got a patch back. Is it possible for me to build a kernel that has this patch and integrate it into the pfSense install? (And how will this work with future upgrades?) Lynn Scott Ullrich wrote: At this point I would suggest sending a message

Re: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

Barry Kiesz wrote: Well.. I wouldn't say it worked, it just wouldn't boot past the "Phys C/H/S 999/16/63 Log C/H/S 499/32/63 part Barry I can't understand what was so radically changed from FreeBSD-RC1. Is it possible that release version is less stable? I don't think so. In the end I made c

RE: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

Well.. I wouldn't say it worked, it just wouldn't boot past the "Phys C/H/S 999/16/63 Log C/H/S 499/32/63 part Barry > -Original Message- > From: Kruno (DON'T REPLY HERE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:43 AM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSe

Re: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

Fatal trap 1: privileged instruction fault while in kernel mode instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc086588c stack pointer = 0x28:0xc0c20d20 frame pointer = 0x28:0xc0c20d68 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def3

[pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92

This is most likely a newbie issue, but here goes.. This is actually a two part question/issue! 1. For the past week I 've been trying to install a fresh copy of Pfsense onto my wrap board. I'm able to install and boot .88 just fine. I attempted to overwrite the image on on 512MB CF card with .

Re: [pfSense Support] Host Names instead of IPs when setting up an alias

On Nov 3, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Mojo Jojo wrote: I am wondering if I can have each of them setup a hostname with a service like dyndns.org and enter their hostname in the alias list instead of their IPs which should keep their access through the firewall working, even when their IPs change.

Re: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailing list

Chris Buechler wrote: good grief. no forum, and people bitch moan and complain. offer a forum, and different people bitch moan and complain. I think you should all get over it. The list isn't going away. The forum is just another support option. ideally we could integrate all these dispar

Re: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailing list

good grief. no forum, and people bitch moan and complain. offer a forum, and different people bitch moan and complain. I think you should all get over it. The list isn't going away. The forum is just another support option. ideally we could integrate all these disparate systems that we no

Re: [pfSense Support] em0 vs. VLANs

On 11/7/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#PROC > > > in the Release-Notes, it says that hardware-VLAN tagging support is now > disabled. > "In the em(4) >

[pfSense Support] em0 vs. VLANs

Hi, http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#PROC in the Release-Notes, it says that hardware-VLAN tagging support is now disabled. "In the em(4) driver, hardware support for VLAN tagging is no

RE: [pfSense Support] forums vs mailing list

That would be great. I hate the idea of always checking out a website. Presently I use about four or five and that is it. > -Original Message- > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 November 2005 00:36 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] forums