I feel pretty confident it's Exchange IMF doing it. But it's not too
bad.
Thanks
Derrick
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Derrick Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For some reason, some of the messages in here get sent to junk mail.
Gmail has been sending about 10-20% of the list
Since a great many of these are dynamic IPs that send spam, rather
than make a giant list, I found it better to block the whole thing.
Anyone who uses those entries I sent, needs to be aware, it was my
preference so one should edit to suit theirs. I did an IPWHOIS on every
one of them based
Hello,
As Pfsense is derived from Monowall and monowall has recently, in the
1.3beta12, incorporated ipv6, I was wondering how difficult it is going
to be to port the changes in monowall to pfsense?
See the announcement of monowall:
http://m0n0.ch/wall/list/showmsg.php?id=346/12
Regards,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Derrick Conner wrote:
I feel pretty confident it's Exchange IMF doing it. But it's not too
bad.
How 'intelligent' is that?
Cheers,
Cristian
--
Top posting is reserved for suits.
-
To unsubscribe,
Chris Buechler wrote:
Gmail has been sending about 10-20% of the list messages to spam the
http://www.robtex.com/rbl/
try wacking in IP addresses of relays and see what turns up
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:23:11AM +0200, R. Th. Boots wrote:
As Pfsense is derived from Monowall and monowall has recently, in the
1.3beta12, incorporated ipv6, I was wondering how difficult it is going
to be to port the changes in monowall to pfsense?
See the announcement of monowall:
Not very, so lets just call it MF' instead of IMF. :)
Derrick
-Original Message-
From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:05 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] blocking china
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008,
Hello Matias,
can you see any error messages on the Console from the box?
thia are to less informations for identifying the source(s) of this error
behavior.
regards
michael
2008/9/24 Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm experiencing random crashed with 1.2, sometimes happens when saving
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing random crashed with 1.2, sometimes happens when saving a
rule, other times when saving advanced settings.No reply from the pfSense
box, no ping replies.nothing.Completly dead.
I'll point at hardware
Hi,
My pfsense box (v1.2) needs reboot or filter reload every once in a while (it's
always when it approches 40-45 days of uptime).
Some tcp connections are blocked (either DNS either HTTP either IMAP), and I
don't know why?.
Have some of you guys seen such a behavior ?.
Regards,
We are seeing this also.
I think going to 1.2.1 will help.
We have seen this - interesting I take out the drive - and placed in
another chasis - same thing
loaded same from scratch --- and sure enough same thing
Dell Hardware - not even a few months old.
Interesting - same hardware w/ 1.2.1
Does the box eventually come back up? What does the console(vga/serial) show?
What hardware platform? Embedded, full, or live installation? How many NICs?
Storage medium (HDD, DOM, CF, CD+Floppy, Etc)?
More info needed please... :-)
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Engineer
Rockbochs Inc.
I've already replied a few moments ago with the output of dmesg, that
should answer many of your questions.
The console is absolutely FROZEN, I just see the menu as always but I
can't do anything.
The installation was made from the 1.2 CD and is running from harddisk.
The problems started
Even more info:
# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD
More info: It seems to be happenning each 70 minutes.
Michael Schuh escribió:
Hello Matias,
can you see any error messages on the Console from the box?
thia are to less informations for identifying the source(s) of this
error behavior.
regards
michael
2008/9/24 Matias Surdi
[EMAIL
The console is absolutely frozen.Can't do anything.
I've the logs on a remote syslog server, but I don't see any error
message that could give me a clue, just DHCP and blocked packets
information.
Also, the contents of all log files in /var/log (after rebooting) isn't
usefull.
Help
wath type of connection (wan) is used?
- xdsl??, fixed ip address o dynamic?
maybe, the ip address has been expired
-Original Message-
From: hitete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:41:34 +0200
Subject: [pfSense Support] pfsense v1.2 hangs when
hitete wrote:
Hi,
My pfsense box (v1.2) needs reboot or filter reload every once in a while
(it's
always when it approches 40-45 days of uptime).
Some tcp connections are blocked (either DNS either HTTP either IMAP), and I
don't know why?.
Have some of you guys seen such a behavior
Hi Matias,
have you cleaned up the filesystem after such a reboot? As mentoided?
second it seems to me it could be a lockup during a hot spot??
30.000 state should be possible with enough ram.
I have a box configured with 1.000.000 states but 2 G RAM!!
such a behavior w/o errormessages could
Should this backup/restore procedure work backing up from 1.2 Release
and restoring on 1.2.1 ?
Thanks.
Michael Schuh escribió:
Hi Matias,
have you cleaned up the filesystem after such a reboot? As mentoided?
second it seems to me it could be a lockup during a hot spot??
30.000 state
yes, it works also over releases in some cases
for me it has worked from 1.0 RELEASE to 1.2 RELEASE
2008/9/24 Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should this backup/restore procedure work backing up from 1.2 Release and
restoring on 1.2.1 ?
Thanks.
Michael Schuh escribió:
Hi Matias,
Finally, we've migrated to 1.2.1 RC1 and seems to be working, at least
for now.
But, we are seeing that the CPU keeps on 50% use, and a top shows that
it's being used by interrupt.
The hardware is the same.(exactly the same, we reinstalled 1.2.1 on the
same disk where was 1.2)
The driver
Try a SMP kernel.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even more info:
# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All
Have you installed a package called Dashboard? I noticed high CPU usage with
some of its applets. Have since disabled that through a brand new install.
- Original Message
From: Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:43:03 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
it should look something like this:
http://www.netsecdb.de/index.php?q=node/996
question: can i merge aliases with upload of xml-config?
I would like to let the rulesets unchanged and only exchange dedicated
aliases in firewalls.
headers and
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, we've migrated to 1.2.1 RC1 and seems to be working, at least for
now.
But, we are seeing that the CPU keeps on 50% use, and a top shows that it's
being used by interrupt.
That's indicative of a maxed out box.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matias Surdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The console is absolutely frozen.Can't do anything.
That's one of two things:
1) Hardware problem, usually RAM, possibly any number of other things.
2) FreeBSD bug specific to your hardware. First I'd try 1.2.1, and if
it
Chris is right on this -
we had the same thing happen -
Changed to 1.2.1 added ram - switched kernel and voila - works
Best wishes
Glenn
On Sep 24, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matias Surdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The console is absolutely
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:23 AM, R. Th. Boots [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
As Pfsense is derived from Monowall and monowall has recently, in the
1.3beta12, incorporated ipv6, I was wondering how difficult it is going to
be to port the changes in monowall to pfsense?
The two are vastly
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Paul Mansfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
Gmail has been sending about 10-20% of the list messages to spam the
http://www.robtex.com/rbl/
try wacking in IP addresses of relays and see what turns up
Only one mail server sends out mail
As Pfsense is derived from Monowall and monowall has recently, in the
1.3beta12, incorporated ipv6, I was wondering how difficult it is going to
be to port the changes in monowall to pfsense?
This question comes back up every few months, and every time I wonder:
what is the justification case
Amen.
-phil
On Sep 24, 2008, at 5:22 PM, RB wrote:
As Pfsense is derived from Monowall and monowall has recently, in
the
1.3beta12, incorporated ipv6, I was wondering how difficult it is
going to
be to port the changes in monowall to pfsense?
This question comes back up every few
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:22 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who has put off rolling out pfSense or a similar platform
because it didn't implement IPv6?
Anything for the US Government is required to be IPv6 ready.
What about the fact that for the
huge majority of users, the magical IPv6 land
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 16:26, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:22 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who has put off rolling out pfSense or a similar platform
because it didn't implement IPv6?
Anything for the US Government is required to be IPv6 ready.
Accepted and
I keep getting these messages in my logs, even after reboot:
ftpsesame[850]: drop: short capture
Perhaps it started when I set up openVON.
I couldn't find much on google about them. Any clue what causes these? The
errors persist after a reboot.
Thanks,
--
Joe Laffey|
for the IPV6 stuff we run - we happily use vYatta
not as nice - but works well.
We can wait.
:-)
On Sep 24, 2008, at 6:26 PM, David Rees wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:22 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who has put off rolling out pfSense or a similar platform
because it didn't implement
RB wrote:
This question comes back up every few months, and every time I wonder:
what is the justification case for IPv6? Aside from those home
hackers that are desperate for a full 128 bits of addressing to route
the twelve devices on their network (never mind my public wifi network
that eats
37 matches
Mail list logo
