On 10/24/06, Sanjay Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all
I am a non-technical user and require load-sharing firewall gateway.
Presently I am using IPcop. I have just installed pfsense 1.0 RC2 on a
machine with 6 ethernet cards, to be installed as LAN, WAN, WAN2, DMZ
& WiFi Zone. Last card
On 10/24/06, Curtis Maurand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On linux ifconfig will give you the MAC address. That should be unique
enough for you to figure out what is what.
True...assuming you know the mac of the nic. Straight up dmesg
showing that Intel nic 1 is eth0 and realcrap nic 1 is eth1
On 10/24/06, Robert Goley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bus order is what changes the order here. It's certainly possible to
> have em0 be em1 after inserting another em card in the machine. Be
> thankful that BSD actually identifies the chipset here...I find it
> impossible to figure out wth h
On 10/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I run three intel dual cards in mine, total of six ports. I like Holger's
advice, too - I've always made it practice to match all the NICs in a system
whenever possible. Be careful that adding the fourth NIC isn't causing the
system to r
You might try reinstalling the squid package. There was an ACL bug
that I just commited a fix for.
--Bill
On 10/23/06, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see the acl allowed_subnets src 172.16.0.0/12 . no on the http_access
localnet. there is of course "http_access allow localhost"
Than
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions
On 10/20/06, Bastian Schern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have little trouble to install pfSense properly. My System will only
produce no IDE errors when I set the DMA mode to UDMA66.
#: atacontrol mode ad0 udma4
In which fil
On 10/20/06, PlanAlpha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was checking out the rrd graphs after a reboot and was wondering if
this feature is going to kill my cf card since it's writting to it.
Can I turn this off? Should I not be running PFSense on a CF?
RRD writes to a ramdisk. We sync from ramdis
On 10/16/06, J. Ryan Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me explain something here since I'm not making the problem clear.
The problem has -nothing- at all to do with the Cisco firewall. The
setsockopt errors occur -well before- any communication with the other
end-point of the VPN tunnel. Case
On 10/15/06, PlanAlpha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. I have pfsense installed on a cf card. I have installed the squid
package. Does the diskcaching from squid write to my cf card? (worried
about it killing my cf card)
Full install to CF card, not an embedded image I take it. Yes, squids
diskc
On 10/14/06, Peter Allgeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can configure nat-traversal on the PIX with:
isakmp nat-traversal 20 (PIX OS 6.x)
crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20 (PIX OS 7.x)
Look for these lines and disable them. If the error still occurs, it
might help, recompiling
On 10/14/06, J. Ryan Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I'm trying to route between a 10.2.3.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24
network... Is that not some part of this functionality? I mean, is
there any reason to not have the kernel support this?
Not the point of my question.
Here's my Cisco cryp
Bingo, sounds like IPSec NAT Traversal to me. Any chance that can be
disabled on the Cisco side? I don't know anything about the Cisco
configs, but if you can disable it, there's a good chance this will
work.
--Bill
On 10/14/06, J. Ryan Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No I haven't tried diffe
There was a bug report on this in cvstrac that I replied to. But for
the benefit of the list do the following from the shell:
/etc/rc.conf_mount_rw
pw group add -n _ntp -g 123
pw user add -n _ntp -u 123 -g 123 -c 'NTP daemon' -d /var/empty -s /sbin/nologin
/etc/rc.conf_mount_ro
On 10/14/06, kel
On 10/9/06, Donald Pulsipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone recommend a decent cheap mini pci wireless G card that I can drop
into my soekris hardware that would be supported by pfSense ?
Wistron CM-9's work like a champ:
http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php?cPath=26_34&products_id=
On 10/8/06, Kristofer Kiik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Filtering outbound from pfSense may protect your
> network, but leaves your firewall (and it's management interface) open
> to attack.
So to remedy leaving the management interface open to attack, you
decided to leave management interface A
the tunnel, yer screwed.
--Bill
On 10/8/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/8/06, Kristofer Kiik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/06, SDamron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All traffic coming in through a tunnel is encrypted. The only way to
> >
On 10/8/06, Kristofer Kiik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/8/06, SDamron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All traffic coming in through a tunnel is encrypted. The only way to
> limit this traffic is to terminate it and pass it through some kinda
> of other firewall, or IDS.
It is encrypted when it
On 10/8/06, Kristofer Kiik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
There does not seem to be a GUI option to limit traffic coming in
through IPSEC. Once you have IPSEC negotiated, all traffic that comes
through that connection has a green light to all of your
lan/dmz/whatever.
I have an IPSEC traffic co
On 10/6/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's under firewall>nat, portforward. Should be pretty obvious what to do there.
Additionally turn on nat reflection at the very bottom of system>advanced. This
will make the internal server reachable from the wan by it's public IP.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 October 2006 19:10
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] re: ath-hal
On 10/5/06, Alan Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Been looking at the ath hal version on pfsense and considering tes
On 10/5/06, Alan Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Been looking at the ath hal version on pfsense and considering testing
latest version from sam but can not seem to find how to add this into
our
Build routine.
We are running "0.9.16.16" in pfsense and "0.9.18.0" is the latest. How
could we add
On 10/5/06, Brian Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just migrated from monowall where I has happy enough until it started to
lockup and had to be manually rebooted every few days.
I restored the monowall config.xml in to pfsense and all seemed to be
working.
Or so I thought. Users can no
On 10/4/06, Captain Bablam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have pushed Openvpn through a bluecoat successfully,
Do you know if it is a configuration option or does it kill the
connection irrespective of configuration?
Wade B
Not sure why it doesn't work. I can get the initial connect
On 10/4/06, Benoît Beaujault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
More and more applications, due to firewall filtering, move to HTTP, is
it in the roadmap of pfsense to propose a fonctionnality to filter some
applications over HTTP (peer-to-peer, MSN, ICQ and so on) ?
Start by forcing all your us
On 10/3/06, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi !
Does anyone have the same problem:
Traffic to IPSEc remote LAN works via from LAN subnet, but nor from WLAN
subnet (with atheros chipset) ?
Any try to get it running fails...
Even with LAN: all to all rule and WLAN all to all rule !?
lol. Oh well, too late, it's been beheaded.
--Bill
On 10/3/06, Roberto Greiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know exactly how or why, but after about 14 hours reporting
errors, suddenly msntp decided to work and updated the timeinfo properly.
Oct 3 14:52:53 msntp[82526]: msntp: 2006 Oc
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK good to know thank you,
Are there plans to support quagga? I thought I saw that on the
list a while back?
Time. 'nuf said.
--Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
On 9/28/06, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I had recently been contacted by a user that was attempting to use my
free 2K/XP IPSEC client with pfsense. The racoon key daemon was tripping
up over a modecfg exchange that wasn't supported by the version of
ipsec-tools install
On 9/27/06, Oscar Rylin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've got it running on a 1850 at the office (gigabit pipe; we've been able
to push about 600Mbps, but that's probably because we can't find anything
better to push against! ;-) )
What type of CPU load while hitting 600Mbit? Using the builtin
Yep. The good news is that we already bind rules to interfaces so
skip steps should work pretty darn good :) We may consider doing the
-oo optimization when FreeBSD imports a newer version of PF.
--Bill
On 9/27/06, Peter Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guys
Interesting article (1st of 3) b
On 9/27/06, Roberto Greiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a feature in monowall that I can't seem to locate in pfSense,
which is 'User Management'. Is it not available? (I'm using 1.0rc2).
That didn't appear in m0n0 until after we'd branched for 1.0.
--Bill
-
Maybe gmail is the virus ;-P
--Bill
On 9/26/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/06, SDamron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't care...I do not use that OS that they are written
> for...and I use GMail :o)
Ditto here on gmail. Not only that I deinstalled that VML expl
What does that have to do with the topic of this thread?
--Bill
On 9/27/06, Augusto Jobim Badaraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi ...
How can i use the spamassassin solution of Pfsense with my actual Postfix
Server?
Thanks
-
On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thank you bill. rather than creating a new vpn tunnel, i just changed the
vpn subnet to 192.168.125.112/28 (techically within the 192.168.125.64/26
footprint). this has caused vpn clients to be able to traverse to my
192.168.125.0/26 site1 n
On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, s
On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, so its time
> to throw mine into the mix too.
>
> i have 2 sites, with an ipsec tunnel between them. site 1 is
> 192.168.125.0/
On 9/26/06, Rob Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem with routing and IPSEC VPN tunnels, attached is a
picture of the setup. There is a firewall cluster in the main office,
the firewalls in the branch offices all connect through IPSEC with the
main office.
So A <-> B is a I
Does your DMZ interface actually have an address? The destination
field is curiously empty in your screenshot.
--Bill
On 9/26/06, Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
i again, now i have an complete other error, if it is an.
i configure the rules for DMZ interface (opt1) so that
the D
On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, so its
>> time
>> > to throw mine into the mix too.
>> >
>> > i ha
On 9/25/06, Roberto Greiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install pfSense (1.0rc2) on a machine, but one of the
boards, despite being identified during installation, does not seem to
work. The leds show no signal of traffic, and a ping to the gateway gets
no answer, neither from o
by the fact that my pfsense had been
upgraded repeatedly since beta 3.
Since then, i've done a fresh install to the 9-4 snapshot, and am now
running the 9-22 snapshot.
so ether i'm retarded- or there's an issue somewhere ;)
On 9/25/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/25/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
not sure if this is going to be helpful-
but after an update to 9-22-snapshot and a reboot this morning on our
pfsense, users were complaining that they were able to do anything on
the vpn connection after they were authenticated via openvpn.
I
http://www.freesbie.org/cvs.html might be of help.
--Bill
On 9/25/06, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After pressing "enter" it shows:
cvs [login aborted]: connect to cvs.freesbie.org(83.149.156.188):2401
failed: Operation timed out
any idea ?
Martin
___
On 9/25/06, Marc Boisis-Delavaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Günter Müller a écrit :
> Enable SSH (System->Advanced) on pfSense and you will have scp and sftp
> access ...
>
>
>
I'm sorry but scp and sftp does'nt work.
Did you turn it on?
--Bill
no. The OpenBSD pf list (don't recall if it's on misc@ or the pf
list) has some comments on how to implement this.
--Bill
On 9/24/06, SDamron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just out of curiousity, would this be the place to start to implement
something like this?
DIOCXCOMMIT struct pfioc_trans *i
I think you misread.
--Bill
On 9/24/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so just to make sure i understand what's going on...
there was vpn firewall controls in pfsense for a bit, but now after
9-21 snapshots this ability is out?
On 9/24/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sa
On 9/22/06, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I didn't yet test, but does the shaper wizzard now check the correct
> >interfaces for SQF(?) capability? There was no code change there.
>
> SQF?
Yep, spelt "A L T Q" :)
In beta4 I had to comment this out in traffic_shaper_wizard.xml
On 9/21/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, pfsense can do dual WAN. No, you can not add the bandwidth from
two ISPs to increase your total bandwidth.
Correct, not for a single transfer. Use a multi-threaded download
manager and you might actually get load balanced across both link
On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a
little leary about updating to the
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/
I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look
like
On 9/18/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I am going to go the SSH route first. I will have access to setup
VPN in about 2 months. I just don't have the time currently, and this
person's system is in California and I am not. I haven't setup the ssh
tunnel before, so if any
On 9/18/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a user who sits outside of our Office network. I need to open up a
port for them to access Filemaker Through. I want to eventually get a VPN
setup, but he has a Mac and I am not certain of how well the VPN will work
with X.4 right no
On 9/18/06, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I didn't yet test, but does the shaper wizzard now check the correct
interfaces for SQF(?) capability? There was no code change there.
SQF?
--Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 9/16/06, BW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a WRAP 2C with 1 ethernet port and 1 wireless card. I have it set
with WAN on ethernet port and LAN on wireless and configured it with
transparent firewall. I have one computer connected to the WAN port then
wireless serial servers connec
For now use one of the virtual IP types in the Firewall menu.
--Bill
On 9/15/06, Augusto Jobim Badaraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How i can create a alias ip like i have in my actual servers like =
ifconfig_vr0_alias..
?
---
On 9/13/06, Jesse Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On line 67 of vpn_pptp_users_edit.php of pfSense RC2 the preg_match()
to check for a valid password is too strict for my use. I
circumvented it by backup/manual edit of config/restoring the
config. Specifically I needed an exclamation point
On 9/12/06, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But nevertheless, you can filter packets outgoing to the internet...
Uhhh, no you can't. pfSense filters inbound only.
Bill, is there a consideration to make rules for packets going into the
firewall ?
This is the behaviour we follow a
On 9/12/06, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, September 12, 2006 13:20, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Can I edit the firewall rules outside the GUI? If so, what are the
>> implications? Am I missing something?
>
> Considering that t
On 9/9/06, Robert Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I realize pfsense isn't SMP-capable, but would it run
on a core-duo (or core-solo processor)? Or are these
processors totally unsupported for now?
If FreeBSD 6.1 runs on it, pfSense should be able to.
--Bill
--
On 9/6/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So if I understand correctly you are porting pfsense to 6.2 instead
of back porting the driver? That looks like a fabulous solution and
quite a bit more sustainable for the future.
Exactly. And takes the risk out of a backport (which looked l
On 9/6/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I accept that I have an unusual layout. In some ways it was based on the
CARP documentation so it is not a great surprise that it includes "about the
_only_ legitimate use for this feature". I am OK with the fact that what I
am doing is unsupp
me more than a day or two (work is eating up a lot of
my hacking time right now) to retool our build/patch system - at that
point I can send a test kernel your way.
--Bill
On 9/1/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me know your conclusions and will talk.
Pierre
On 1-Sep
Robert has about the _only_ legitimate use for this feature. And an
interesting network layout to boot. I suspect we don't allow for
duplicate VHIDs though which would be required to make this work.
Other than that, in his case, I'd expect that this should more or less
"do the right thing" - as
On 9/4/06, Craig FALCONER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not call them 1.0-SNAPSHOT-2006-09-03? At least they'll sort correctly
in a listing. Or are we really talking about the 8th and 9th of march 2006?
It proves that pfSense is a global programme, when date representation
issues arise :)
A
On 9/1/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If all it takes is $50 I would be happy to oblige the board did cost
me $500 and it is worthless without a driver.
Understood, they aren't cheap boards. To be clear, what I'm offering
is to provide a replacement kernel (that can be uploaded a
On 9/1/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bill,
How much was the bounty?
Not sure...probably only $50 or so. The thread was removed from the
forum at some point.
I guess I don't understand the problem. Why had the driver got to be
backported for each version? How is pfsense bui
On 9/1/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the status support of the Intel PWLA8494MT. I had it working
with a special build sent by Bill Marquette including Intel driver
6.0.5. However this has disappeared from the latest update. Is it
going to come back with the ne
Where's this log coming from? The NLB boxes, or the pfSense box?
--Bill
On 8/30/06, Scott Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Example of the log:
Aug 30 14:19:16 Grey_Skull 172.16.50.102:3292 172.16.50.109:443 TCP
-
Not sure how FAST_IPSEC solves this problem, but FWIW it's already
enabled in the pfSense kernel. Why doesn't the builtin IPSec work for
you (if it's due to the Cisco proprietary goo on the other end then no
need to answer)?
--Bill
On 8/30/06, Alvaro Pietrobono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 8/25/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll want to reboot after making that change. This naturally isn't
> supported, but if you understand how carp balancing works, it's still
> configurable.
This is the case outlined in the Docs
Yeah, see, the problem is that most peopl
On 8/25/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carp is the simple way to balance across this setup. Is there a way to use
the load balancer on the CAP NIC instead. All examples seem to have a 1
box solution
Is the ADSL PPPOE? If so, does the PPPOE terminate on the DSL modem,
or the pfS
On 8/24/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have 2 ADSL lines each with it's own pfsense box.
> >
> > I have set up CARP to provide a common LAN address shared
> between the two
> > boxes
> >
> > Should this configuration l
I'd post this on freebsd-net or an openbgp mailing list (is there
one?)...OpenBSD which develops openbgp has fixed numerous bugs since
OpenBSD 3.7 released, I'd be willing to bet that OpenBSD 3.9 w/
OpenBGP 3.9 (if we consider the version of OpenBGP to be the same as
the OS it was developed on) wo
On 8/23/06, bablam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I have just removed openbgpd 3.7_2 from my pfsense box and
installed 3.9. When I attempt to run bgpd I get the following error;
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.7" not found, required by "bgpd"
How can I instal
On 8/18/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Developer CD Questions
>
> Is there fuller documentation on the use of the pfSense or similar
> development setups around?
>
> More specifically
>
> 1) Is the developer CD supposed to pro
No reason this shouldn't work.
--Bill
On 8/17/06, Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sorry if this is common knowledge, I did not get anywhere by
trawling the forum and mailing list archives.
I have a dual wan setup (WAN, OPT1), my ISP has provided me two
public IP addresses in t
The DNS override only works for items querying pfsense, not for
pfsense itself. It and the daemon that does the DNS overriding
(dnsmasq) use resolv.conf which should be populated with your ISPs DNS
servers. You appear to have a bit of a catch-22. Since you have a
FULL resolver internal to your
On 8/12/06, Samer Chaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Sirs,
Where to download the squid package for PFsense, is there any documentation
about installing it and running it?
As you've been told on IRC, you need to be running a Full Install.
The LiveCD is basically for demo purposes.
--Bill
On 8/12/06, Samer Chaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I want to install PFsense 1RC2 on a 256MB USB KEYDRIVE is that possible?
Shall I use the same menu option 98 from the LiveCD?
Thanks,
Samer
Why don't you try it and report back?
--Bill
--
On 8/11/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to check my changes against a running version of HEAD. I have a
running RC2 for development. What is the best way to update to HEAD now
cvs_sync.sh is no more?
Should I just nuke the box and install the developer edition?
If so is cvs
On 8/10/06, Reuel ben Yisrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/10/06, Reuel ben Yisrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Marquette wrote:
>
> > On 8/10/06, Reuel ben Yisrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Bill Marquette wrote:
> >>
>
On 8/10/06, Reuel ben Yisrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 8/10/06, Reuel ben Yisrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Bill Marquette wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I think it's in /etc/inc/services.inc - most of our non-G
On 8/10/06, Reuel ben Yisrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
>
> I think it's in /etc/inc/services.inc - most of our non-GUI related
> code is in /etc/inc.
>
> --Bill
Where is the code that generates /tmp/rules.debug? I want to help find
the alias b
On 8/10/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had a quick look at the OpenBSD docs and they indicate it runs
dhclient-script in the same way as ISC's dhc client so all should be OK
can anyone tell me where the file containing the function
services_dhcpd_configure() and it's friends
On 8/10/06, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
I've just installed RC2, and I've seen there is the demon l2tpd.. is it
working? I know there is not a menu section, but is it possible to use it?
Thank you!
Tom
The code for that is only in HEAD.
--Bill
On 8/9/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/9/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flash of understanding
>
> Updates are tied into DHCP CLIENT to update changes to pfsense's interfaces
> Updates are not tried into DHCPD to update information on leases issued
>
> Sorry fo
On 8/4/06, A. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When you send (initiate) a packet out on port abc, and it is allowed
through, the firewall opens up a "hole" (which is stored in the state table)
that allows a response from the IP the packet was sent to on the return port
specified in the packet.
Y
Not for inbound traffic it isn't.
--Bill
On 8/4/06, A. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The original rule on the firewall is already good for that.
>From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
>To: support@pfsense.com
>S
On 8/4/06, A. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a whole subnet, routing is what I need.
The computers also MUST have public IP addresses assigned to their
interfaces.
That will also screw me over when one of the subnets needs to talk to the
other subnet using public IPs
http://faq.pfsen
On 8/4/06, Nick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>> On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because
>>> pfSense is currently not an x64 platform.
>>
>> Opterons will run ju
On 8/3/06, Jonathan Wanak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get the serial console to work. I'm running pfSense RC2, on the hard drive on
a PII Dell Optiplex, connected to my Windows XP machine with a null modem cable. Connection
settings are 9600/8/N/1/HW handshaking. I have ver
On 8/2/06, Nick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Not with that error message you aren't. That came from HEAD. Please
>> reinstall. Thanks
>
> PS. for those still wondering
On 8/2/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not with that error message you aren't. That came from HEAD. Please
reinstall. Thanks
PS. for those still wondering why cvs_sync.sh is gone...here you go.
--Bill
-
On 8/2/06, Nick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im getting this error when trying to reset the admin password via the
console:
Error: cannon determine root pwd in sync_webgui_passwords().
Effectively locking me out of the firewall.
Is there anyway to correct this?
I was hoping to upgrade to
Works here on
6.0.2800.1106.xpsp2.050301-1526CO
SP1; Q822925; Q837009; Q867801; Q903235
--Bill
On 8/1/06, macafee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My IE Browse version is 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158
The IE ERROR IS
"Line:324
Char:1
Error:Object expected
Code:0
URL:http://mypfsenseip/firew
On 7/27/06, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amen. found out only after buying 10 wrap 2cs with 64mb :) now their justoffce aps :(Life is moderately better with the changes we made in CVS - it'll be in RC2. _BUT_ I think it's safe to say that 64M machines are last on our list for getting att
On 7/28/06, Jure Pečar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:08:51 +0200"Espen Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> The only time I have seen behaviour like this is when either the nic
> or the cable has issue, when everything stopped it was the card> trying to autosense half duplex be
On 7/27/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1383.0.htmlI am baffled by the above post on the forum. Likeit or not pfS devs ... PPTP is here to stay and
has it place in networking. I am not a bigsupporter of it personally and I am fully aware ofits
Post full dmesg please. Thanks--BillOn 7/27/06, Carlos Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Scott.Doesn't have Sound device on my machine.And not find pnp or Plug and Play entries on Bios Setup.I have two onboard network adapters.1) Intel PRO/100 82562GT.2) Broadcom Gigabit BCM5721KFBG.
freebsd# if
RFC1918 or bogon filter on wan most likely.--BillOn 7/26/06, Pedro Paulo de Magalhaes Oliveira Junior <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:VITBOX is a equipment of the ISP that provides NAT
The PPTP server is outside DSL in other cityThe firewall is full OPEN-Mensagem original-De: Holger Bauer [mailt
On 7/26/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm curious, what sort of things have been found wrong with cvs_sync.sh in
> RELENG_1? Personally, I've been doing cvs_sync.sh on one of my routers at
> the office here for a couple months wi
401 - 500 of 974 matches
Mail list logo
