On 9/6/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So if I understand correctly you are porting pfsense to 6.2 instead of back porting the driver? That looks like a fabulous solution and quite a bit more sustainable for the future.
Exactly. And takes the risk out of a backport (which looked like it may end up being rather tedious). It also means that anyone can build a RELENG_6 based image for any and all new hardware in RELENG_6 that isn't in the branch we're tracking for 1.0. There is some risk of stuff not working quite right of course, but that's why we're not changing to RELENG_6_2 this late in the release cycle. --Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
