Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread RB
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:38, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote: I made a special trip - log attached.  A check of my tcpdump monitoring actually indicates that while ng0 does not see return traffic, the physical interface (actually fxp3) does.  It's also indicating that the return packets are 2

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread Tom Müller-Kortkamp
Am 09.12.2009 um 15:38 schrieb RB: I made a special trip - log attached. A check of my tcpdump monitoring actually indicates that while ng0 does not see return traffic, the physical interface (actually fxp3) does. It's also indicating that the return packets are 2 bytes larger than it expects

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread Tim Dressel
Not that it helps much, but I have had severe problems with the fxp driver under BSD/pfsense. I mentioned this a while back and Chris suggested that this was only in a few snapshots. Not being one to argue with a support/developer because I am in awe with this project, but I can replicate traffic

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread RB
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:29, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote: For me the issue was exactly like you are describing. Can connect and everything appears OK, but just zero traffic flow. Nothing useful in logs. Then all of a sudden it would start passing traffic, but then get sketchy and

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:21 PM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:29, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote: For me the issue was exactly like you are describing. Can connect and everything appears OK, but just zero traffic flow. Nothing useful in logs. Then all of a

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread RB
On 2009-12-10, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote: I'll try turning off ToE in a few hours and report the results. If all goes well, I'd hope the 1.2.3 final version picks up the noted stable/7 change. This was the fix - thanks, Tom, for identifying such an edge case and linking it to

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote: Well, for posterity's sake then: if you have trouble in pfSense/FreeBSD with traffic not passing through an Intel 10/100 NIC (fxp), particularly when return/inbound packets aren't showing up in mpd or another user-level program, turn

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-10 Thread Jim Pingle
On 12/10/2009 6:56 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote: Well, for posterity's sake then: if you have trouble in pfSense/FreeBSD with traffic not passing through an Intel 10/100 NIC (fxp), particularly when return/inbound packets aren't showing

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-09 Thread RB
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 01:34, Ermal Luçi ermal.l...@gmail.com wrote: Please provide logs of mpd and explain more what you are trying to do and how you are trying to achive it! What I'm trying to achieve is awfully simple - with a fresh install of 1.2.3-RC3, I'm plugging a dumb Speedport ADSL

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-09 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:01 PM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 01:34, Ermal Luçi ermal.l...@gmail.com wrote: Please provide logs of mpd and explain more what you are trying to do and how you are trying to achive it! What I'm trying to achieve is awfully simple - with a

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-09 Thread Jim Pingle
On 12/9/2009 9:01 AM, RB wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 01:34, Ermal Luçi ermal.l...@gmail.com wrote: Please provide logs of mpd and explain more what you are trying to do and how you are trying to achive it! What I'm trying to achieve is awfully simple - with a fresh install of 1.2.3-RC3,

Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC3 PPPoE

2009-12-09 Thread RB
On 2009-12-09, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: Are you sure that your DSL link is solid and noise-free? I have seen cases where routers would sign on but could not pass traffic and it turned out to be a weak DSL signal. Does this same line work with any other router? It works with the same