Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection and
Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both
connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The
company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's that
we are throwing
Scott,
Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going to have to
go another route.
-Gary
Scott Williamson wrote:
Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection and
Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both
connections and use
1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL?
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary,
and those who cannot.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged
Not only that bridging won't work for CARP it won't work with policybased
routing (as the name already says) and/or loadblalancing either. How many
public IPs do your T1s have? You need at least 3 IPs at each T1 that you can
use to set up CARP correctly. The subnet between the pfSenses and the
Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100
Servers?
Regards
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary,
and those who cannot.
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:56 AM
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because
pfSense is currently not an x64 platform.
-Gary
Scott Williamson wrote:
Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100
Servers?
Regards
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can
I run pfsense in Sun Ultra20
-Mensagem original-
De: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2006 13:39
Para: support@pfsense.com
Assunto: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then
On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because
pfSense is currently not an x64 platform.
Opterons will run just fine on 32 bit as well as 64 bit. One of our
builder servers is a dual Opteron.
Scott
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because
pfSense is currently not an x64 platform.
Opterons will run just fine on 32 bit as well as 64 bit. One of our
builder servers is a dual Opteron.
Hi Scott dev team,
may be somewhat off topic in a certain sense but possibly of interest to more people (or i simply missed something here):
Did you finish your hackatron by now and by releasing RC2? Or are we expecting further bunch of fixes in the nearer future due to heavy development
On 8/3/06, Holger Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott dev team,
may be somewhat off topic in a certain sense but possibly of interest to
more people (or i simply missed something here):
Did you finish your hackatron by now and by releasing RC2? Or are we
expecting further bunch of
Same here have ired this forsome time with
no success
From: Rob Terhaar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 August 2006 18:35
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] USP
NAT Reflection
On 8/1/06, Scott
Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 8/2/06, Tim
Hi,
I'm trying to get the serial console to work. I'm running pfSense RC2, on the
hard drive on a PII Dell Optiplex, connected to my Windows XP machine with a
null modem cable. Connection settings are 9600/8/N/1/HW handshaking. I have
verified 2-way communication between the firewall box
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Jonathan Wanak wrote:
I see the pfSense boot-up and shut-down messages in HyperTerminal.
However, once I get to the line Bootup complete I can't seem to do
anything. I was expecting to see the main console screen at this point,
but nothing further appears. When I reboot
14 matches
Mail list logo
