Downloading package configuration file... done.
Downloading stunnel and its dependencies... done.
Checking for successful package installation... failed!
Installation aborted.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus
from any to { 192.168.1.2/32
192.168.1.3/32 } port = 80 flags S/SA keep state queue (qWANdef,
qWANacks) label USER_RULE: NAT http test
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2005 06:16
To: Scott Ullrich
Cc: alan walters; support@pfsense.com
Just looking at this would it be possible
to add the nflow package
To packages list would be great to be able
to collect flows from router and forward them to central host
From:
alan walters
Sent: 25 July 2005 20:57
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] snmp
On 7/29/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok the allowed ip addresses are in that table, but what I really
wanted
Was the rule that was being applied to the captive portal for allowed
ip
addresses and active clients.
# cat /tmp/rules.debug | grep captiveportal
no rdr on fxp2 proto tcp
It would be good to have packages installed but not running
for example ntop. Can these be configured on boot or to be started when you
want them
Im still having problems with my vpns I have sad and
spd entries at each end on the tunnel but I cannot traceroute or use any other
protocol . does anyone have any idea of the issue that might be prevailling
Seems to be a bit of a bug or querk with carp setup.
Setup your 1 to 1 nats first then add carp before you add any port
forward rules.
It seems that if there is anything in the port forward rules before this
it gives the error you mention.
I have seen a few people with this issue.
Aug 2 08:48:26 mpd: MRU 1492
Aug 2 08:48:26 mpd: MAGICNUM
a74aead8
Aug 2 08:48:26 mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP
MD5
Aug 2 08:48:26 mpd: [pppoe0] LCP:
state change Ack-Sent -- Opened
Aug 2 08:48:26 mpd: [pppoe0] LCP:
phase shift ESTABLISH -- AUTHENTICATE
Aug 2 08:48:26 mpd: [pppoe0] LCP:
Aug 2 08:52:39 racoon: INFO:
10.4.230.1[500] used as isakmp port (fd=14)
Aug 2 08:52:39 racoon: INFO: fe80::240:f4ff:fe65:3d13%rl1[500] used as isakmp
port (fd=15)
Aug 2 08:52:39 racoon: INFO: fe80::202:b3ff:fece:791f%fxp0[500] used as isakmp
port (fd=16)
Aug 2 08:52:39 racoon: INFO:
I get a warning on 0.73 and
0.73.2 about the configuration that I am using being newer than the one being
used.
This happens on boot. I defaulted my configuration when on 0.73 but still get the
error on boot.
Any ideas
Is it possible to route all
traffic from opt1 across an ipsec vpn.
Or is there anyway to encapsulate
traffic somehow else.
What I am trying to achieve is
routing some remote sites we have back into our primary backbone.
We are having problems with DOS
attacks on these sites. So we
Ok I have made a bit of progress with this one.
I have setup a vpn by editing the xml file in the vpn section
The local vpn is configured like so
The remote subnet becomes 0.0.0.0/0.
At the remote end I made a outbout nat rule for my local subnet
And added firewall rules to allow those out my
Change the password in the web interface.
The same password for webadmin user and root user
-Original Message-
From: Rodolfo Vardelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 August 2005 11:24
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] 73.6 embedded - ssh
When ssh is enabled there's
following error
occurs when trying to add a new ipsec tunnel version
0.74
XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 248
There seems to be problems
with firewall rules in 0.74
I am having problems with the
user defined rules sometimes it seems ok and sometimes it needs acouple of reboots for the rules to work.
Example block all lan to 192.168.0.1:443.
Would normally causse a problem
alan
Just looking for a quick blah on how the incoming load
balancer should work
is only second rate
Sob sob sob
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2005 15:58
To: alan walters
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: [pfSense-discussion] Security problem
while loading rules?
I havent tested a Embedded
The this that the pope server is not working on the optional
interfaces on 0.74.6 on a wrap board. But it think it is to do with the rules
errors we have discussed and not the pppoe server.
Aug 10 09:14:31 mpd:
[pppoe0] PPPoE server listening on ath0: for service *
Aug 10 09:14:40 php:
Grand thanks
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2005 17:30
To: Scott Ullrich
Cc: alan walters; support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] error on 0.74.6 wrap board
Yeah, I saw this on my Soekris throughout the hackathon on known
In host ap mode all seems fine in version 0.76 for me.
What mode is the ath card in
-Original Message-
From: Giorgio Ducci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 August 2005 22:51
To: support@pfsense.com; Scott Ullrich
Subject: [pfSense Support] 0.76-embbedded on WRAP 1E
Hi to all,
I don't know about this I still am seeing problems with ipsec
Auto generated rules being wrong and an empty tunnel still being made
with 0.77.
I know this is nothing to do with the above problem but 0.77 is
problematic with ipsec mobile clients and no tunnels created.
To: alan walters
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ipsec and 0.77
Is this a fresh configuration?
On 8/18/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about this I still am seeing problems with ipsec
Auto generated rules being wrong and an empty tunnel
I just install from the cd straight onto the CF card and disable swap
Then when it is setup is disable logs and forward to my syslog server
works great
The embedded images lack video, keyboard and mouse support. Perhaps
the best solution is to install using the cdrom installer to the
I agree this is still an issue in 0.77.
It happens when you change the firewall rules.
It does not matter what is in the ipsec setup. Wheather it is empty or
you are using it
-Original Message-
From: Bastian Schern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2005 18:56
To:
but if you do any of the
above after that the issue comes back
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2005 19:40
To: alan walters
Cc: Bastian Schern; support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] There were error(s) loading the rules
On 8/19/05
Seems that if you put a
wireless card in the lan
there is no option to make it a hostap only bss and ibss. Also other features
that are available in opt wireless interfaces are
missing.
Just a not
of thanks to the pfsense team.
We deployed a test of a three
way bridge the other day.
Wan
|
|
LAN
OPT1
All bridged to WAN. Made allow
all rules and then a few rules to minimise access to web interface and ssh
All is roses 20 clients running on a test with
two ATH
This is working perfectly with my radius server now.
What ever you did to it was the answer.
BETA must be very close now congrats
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you think you really need to go over this problem here.
This is the way freebsd works presently
This is the way a PIX works presently
This is not the way linux works presently.
This is not the way linksys works presently
If you cannot work with this don't use it.
Where is the problem.
Sorry FWA-3660-02
I get the VERY same message when trying the
image
on a Advantech FWA-3680.
[alan walters]
Similar problem here with a via 1000 mhz embedded board ou cannot set
the cf to primary. I guess this is really a freebsd 6 issue still?
Regards
alan
I cannot seem to get the pppoe server to work correctly on an ath
wireless card.
It works fine on rl or sis or any other fixed network card. But cannot
get a connection to it when it is on an ath card
Can anyone else confirm this behaviour
Alan Walters
Aillweecave Company Limited
Version 0.82.4 signal srenght on wireless does not seem to report
assiocations of clients with the access point any more
there are are no stats showing even though we have a wireless client
connected
-
To unsubscribe,
I havea query about filtered bridges.
I have opt2 bridged to opt1
I have rules on opt1 to all certain IP addresses to access
the internet
Ie if interface opt1 allow 192.168.1.100 to all
I have 1 ip address on opt2 that I want to allow onto opt1
and access the internet
What rules
This might be off topic but I am flummoxed by the problem so
I thought I would ask.
Configuration
Pfsense
Lan with 3 vlans and lan as parent.
Switch with vlan 1 through to 4 enabled
Port 2 is setup on switch with all vlans and is plugged into
lan on pfsense.
Then the
on pfsense
is,
but are you setting up TWO vlan interfaces on the pfsense? e.g.
LAN = fxp0 (or whatever)
vlan0 = fxp0 vlan 2
vlan1 = fxp0 vlan 3
[alan walters]
Yes the vlans are configured on pfsense as you have outlined above.
Traffic seems to flow into the correct interface on pfsense
mean that
it's a tagged port, just that the machine on that port can see and
talk to each of the vlans (untagged). That of course would require
pfSesne to support real interface aliases - which we don't (and I'm
not yet convinced is required)
--Bill
[alan walters] [alan walters]
Just
port in both vlans (membership wise). don't know
how your switch does that.
2. change the ingress filtering so it won't drop by default packets
with a VID not matching the default one.
Not doing both of the above would cause your symptoms.
[alan walters]
I think I agree with u I
I am having a problem with vlans and rules.
There is one lan (vlan0) and 7 optional interfaces.
I havea rule on opt7 (at the top of the rule list) pass tcp
lanip opt7network. But in the firewalllogs I get
Deny lanip tcp opt7ip .
Very perplexed by this. Look forward to some help
On 10/3/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a problem with vlans and rules.
There is one lan (vlan0) and 7 optional interfaces.
I havea rule on opt7 (at the top of the rule list) pass tcp lanip
opt7network. But in the firewalllogs I get
Deny lanip tcp opt7ip
We have a wrap board that runs on failover system.
There are about 25 VIP addresses on this system and 8 vlans.
We are having problems with snmpd.
It does not respond to a snmpwalk. Netstat says it is
listening on all ports
Top says that it is running. There are no blocks in the
Just a general question.
Would like to know if people think that this would work.
Internet
real
|
Datacentre
(IPSECEND)
|
|
|-- |
| |
| |
| |
Internet
1
internet2
| |
Cool you guys are great. This solves a long running problem. Time to get
testing I guess. thanks
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 October 2005 22:05
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] failover ipsec
On 10/13/05, alan
Oct 18 09:43:20 racoon: DEBUG: === Oct 18 09:43:20
racoon: DEBUG: 188 bytes message received from 195.218.115.140[500] to
192.168.1.100[500] Oct 18 09:43:20
racoon: DEBUG: cd4fbccf a18d7f66 0d455d4b 554b207a 08102001 c9ab08ba
00bc 62bae5e7 d26b2921 361ebf5c 3c378227 d9540a69
Have you noticed the tty errors in the shell on these igames I only used
the 128 mb ad2 images. The shell seems to give errors
-Original Message-
From: Bao C. Ha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 October 2005 18:41
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash
Two choices I guess
In firewall rules
On lan2
pass (your ip) accesss to (ports of your choice) to (lan ips of your choice)
just access the web interface on http://lan2
-Original Message-
From: dny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 October 2005 10:26
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject:
Seem to be having continuous issues with https and web
interface. I am making connections over latent links they work then it becomes
unreachable.
If I login with ssh I can see that there is not mini_httpd
or httpd daemon running. how can I restart this from a shell???
/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seem to be having continuous issues with https and web interface. I
am
making connections over latent links they work then it becomes
unreachable.
If I login with ssh I can see that there is not mini_httpd or httpd
daemon
running. how
These errors happened on wrap when you select option 8 in the console.
I can confirmthis ad2 image
-Original Message-
From: Bao C. Ha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 October 2005 20:35
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Compact Flash images!
Hi Imre,
Just wondering if someone can give the low down on wheather
it is possible to over come this problem.
Have a ipsec tunnel from remote location to lan of pfsense
then using routing allow traffic out the wan interface of pfsense.
Client --Remote pfsense
-to-net tunnel... Using 0.0.0.0 you likely be a vpn hub that is
something 'weird' from the security point of view.
That's my 0.02€ ;)
Regards,
jonathan
alan walters wrote:
This must have got overwritten when we sync'd to m0n0wall for their
certificate support. Do
implementation in my box so if either
each one obtain good result would be grateful to post the good news in
the list, don't you think? ;)
Regards,
jonathan
alan walters wrote:
Yep I use an email address as the cn.
Open vpn would be great but this seems to still not be available.
Even a gre
decipher these numbers better, I am confused a little
bu=y them.
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2005 18:56
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFsense as PN server
alan walters wrote:
Your aren't going
on that will take some time to
troubleshoot.I'll try to take a look but there are no promises
considering the amount of other items that are waiting to be fixed.
On 10/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There does not seem to be a ovpn_srv_opt1.conf or any ovpn_srv conf
files in this dir
Yep same config as discussed befor but bridge the opt with the wan and
let him put his ips on his firewall.
Then shaper the traffic on opt1 on the way out
-Original Message-
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2005 22:20
To: support@pfsense.com
I think you could still do it to a certain extent though. Set the
interface speed on the opt1 lower than the lan.
Or I guess in is a dsl connection. Segment the lan and put all the
public ips on it and 1 to1 nat his public block back to his router.
Maybe a little insecure but the shaper would
@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] pfsense 0.88
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 15:00 +0100, alan walters wrote:
Alan,
First I should say it is not solid or user friendly if you have to
wait
for given amount of time and then reboot the box. I think changes
ether
have to be applied at once
Could this be an issue with the duplex. Maybe different speeds on the
lan the wan and switches?
I see the wan is on 1G connections. Is it the same on the wan.
See if you can checkout an earlier version I was on 0.88 and 0.89.2
today with no troubles but I was only working on 100mb switches
I have see this one our network.
Last week I made a connection to the freeradius ftp server and
downloaded something. Now the freeradius server and pftpx are
communicating. For the past week
-Original Message-
From: stephan schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 October 2005
I think the first rule of testing applies start at the beginning and
work your way backwards.
Please u solved ur problems
-Original Message-
From: Peter Zaitsev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 November 2005 18:16
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Network
information
Regards
Alan walters
Ps the most recent version from mono 1.2-opvn2 seems to work ok, but
there is a couple of small bugs in firewall rules still.
-Original Message-
From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 November 2005 15:57
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense
the ttl decrementing and maybe resolve the issue
described in the above article which
is what I have been experiencing on tests.
I know that this is only a cosmetic error, but it looks a
little ugly and I would really like to be rid of it.
Regards
Alan walters
I have been testing on versions above 0.86.4 and am having
contiueing issues with inbound load balancing and inbound nat.
The connections seem to just hang sometimes for up to about
20 seconds and then everything returns to normal.
The main service that shows the problem is squid but
It already does a config_lock() operation. Please give a set of
instructions on which area in paticular is being corrupted.
[alan walters]
A week ago I was updating in dns forwarders. I had two pages open and
committed apply changes to each or them nearly simultaneously the config
xml
When ever I try to add a vlan the vr driver it fails. Freebsd
seemstomake out like it is supported is this not the case.
Regards
alan
Enable yes
Interface (selected
public carp address that I want to use 192.168.5.100)
Failover ip (same
address as above 192.168.5.100)
Peerip (used
the carp sync real ip address of the other carp in my array 192.168.10.2)
Shared key (used a 16
byte aes key)
This end is a mobile
This carp init thing does not seem to be such and issue on
this version. Looks like it is nearly licked.
I did not see much change in the cvstrac though so not sure
what was done.
Present testing shows the carp to come up fine on the wan
but it is a little slow.
Will report more on
Just a note that these do not seem to work all that well. Maybe
new Feaures should be disabled by default. Rather than enabled.
I get a pile of rdr errors
Regards
alan
If there is a negoitation in ipsec tunnels and you change an
ipsec setting or add a new tunnel.
Ipsec seems to report errors about being unable to bind to
the addresses on the box.
On further review of this the issue seems
to lie in the fact that the tunnel end of the ipsec is running
A via padlock chipset. If I replace the
tunnel end with the same config.xml file and a wrap board the tunnel works
perfectly.
From: alan walters
Sent: Saturday
.
On 11/12/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a note that these do not seem to work all that well. Maybe new
Feaures
should be disabled by default. Rather than enabled.
I get a pile of rdr errors
Regards
alan
This one looks very good carp vlans
ipsec failover aliases inbound outbound nat all look great sorry we only use Ethernet for
connectivity so cant give any more feedback but looks solid to me.
Iperf tests on vpn tunnels with VIA 1000mhz
chipsets show excellent vpn performance even
My present experience with carp and bridging did not go well 1 GB of
multicast traffic in under 5 minutes.
All considered I was using vlans so maybe that was my trouble
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:43 PM
To:
I was under the impression that altq has support for vlans. Is
this enabled in pfsense at the moment.
Have tried a couple of time but get unsupported interfaces. I
know that my fxp and sis cards support it
So I guess it must be the vlans that are the issue
Tried on 0.90 through to non released 0.93.2
With the same troubles.
I have vlans on both of the pfsense wan and lan interfaces.
Might try again tomorrow. To see if I can isolate it a bit
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, alan walters wrote:
I was under the impression that altq has support for vlans
manually set one? Even if not,
there's a change I sent in where it would default to 10mb if nothing
was detected. Scott also committed a change where vlan was accepted
as a valid shaper interface.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, alan walters wrote:
I was under the impression that altq has support
I would love a copy of this if you get it working well. Could you post a
snippet to the list when you complete it
thanks
-Original Message-
From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 5:37 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support]
Running 94.2 the embedded update looks huge tried installing
all the same but gets to 15.83 mb and fails missing or incomplete
firmware
Anyone else??? 128 mb ram wrap platform 128 mb cf card
Memory never goes over 45 percent.
cheers
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:28 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] upgrading wrap to 94.4
Fixed. It's making its way to mirrors now.
On 11/20/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry tried
a few different images. Same error.
The
following input errors were detected:
The uploaded image
file is not for this platform (wrap).
Ta that is the one
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 10:33 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 0.94.6 wrap
Modify /etc/platform and change it to embedded
On 11/20/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED
Either your LAN or WAN interface doesn't support ALTQ. The wizard
cannot continue.
Using sis Ethernet cards and vlans on all interfaces. I had thought
that the code was committed to allow vlans with altq.
Look forward to hearing wheather this patch should be in pfsense at the
moment or
How can the httpd be restarted from the command line. I attempted
to run the php script from the command line but it failed looking for
credentials.
Interesting I think you are using fxp eth cards??? Is that right.
Mine are sis cards. That seems to be our
only difference.
I am testing on wrap platform have tried on
four different test boxes with four different images.
Using the latest images
with fresh installs now and still the
/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can the httpd be restarted from the command line. I attempted to
run the
php script from the command line but it failed looking for
credentials.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
,
it's a known bug that I haven't had time to dig into (and from other
reports, it's purely cosmetic - although you may need to resave the
normal filter policy and apply to force the shaper rules to load)).
--Bill
On 11/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either your LAN or WAN interface
if you are looking for something else) you are looking to kill
/restart (unless you already killed it that is)
/usr/local/sbin/mini_httpd -c **.php|**.cgi
-u root -maxproc 16 -i /var/run/mini_httpd.pid
-lsf
From: alan walters
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23. november 2005 12:06
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] restarting httpd
Try
/usr/local/sbin/mini_httpd -S -E /var/etc/cert/pem -c **.php|**.cgi
-u root -maxproc 16 -i /var/run/mini_httpd.pid
Notice the |, thats a pipe in shell-land.
On 11/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
was the same bug that bit
you ;)
--Bill
On 11/23/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool maybe. It is at the end
Hopefully we'll have that fixed soon. Please open a ticket
Seem to be having a continueing problem with this. Mini httpd
is running but there is the maximum number of instances running. Even though I can
confirm I have only been connected for a few minites. Netstat then shows about
50 connections from my ip to the pfsense box on the https port.
-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 8:39 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pppoe implementation of mpd
What do they do, and why are they needed and in what cases.
On 11/25/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
/27/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
radius-ip
When using RADIUS for authentication, enable IP address assignment via
RADIUS as well.
From the following man page. Do we think we could add this in to the
pppoe
configuration. Sorry to pester but I did not really get a reply
http
Seem to have an issue with disk usage on 0.95a on
embedded platform. Disk useage shows itself as 101%
When I connect via pppoe server on LAN I can download at 50
KB/sec when on Lan directly I can download at 200KB/sec
This reconciles with my uplink. Can anyone shed some light
on this for me please???
Just trying to get pftpx working over an ipsec tunnel. Even with
all the ftp helpers off it still seems like there is a helper enabled
somewhere.
Can anyone shed some light on how I can configure the
helpers to work correctly.
ftp
pfsense
ipsec tunnel
pfsense
lan
pppoe
I can confirm if you are using full updates crontab is being updated. Well it
is being replaced on my system. I have some checks that I have to keep
reinstalling in there due to changes
-Original Message-
From: Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08
that update_file.sh may actually break your box -
be prepared to fix it (especially if you do an update_file.sh -all).
--Bill
On 12/8/05, Damien Dupertuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
I'm trying without the Update_file.sh /etc/crontab then...
I'll keep you informed...
Thanks
--- alan walters
Title: Embedded image
Seems that the embedded image is in the updates directory. I guess this is just a mistake. Or is this an update
I know I have seen a few reports of ipsec issues recently I can
confirm that this problem does seem real to me.
Working configuration
0.95.4 tunnel initiator.
0.89 something client
0.94.12 client
All worked here
As soon as we upgraded a client into 0.95 series ipsec
stopped
Title: Starting mpd with pppoe from the command line
How can I start mpd for pppoe from the command line I have changed some configurations and want to test them
Alan Walters
Aillweecave Company Limited
Ballyvaughan
Co Clare
Ph: 00 353 65 7077 036
Fax: 00 353 65 7077 107
Title: Ntp server
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=8356
Are there any plans to addd this to releng branch. Or will it come later.
Would be great for hosts on the lan
Alan Walters
Aillweecave Company Limited
Ballyvaughan
Co Clare
Ph: 00 353 65 7077 036
Fax: 00 353 65 7077
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
