Weird!! I no longer have freeze ups after saving something. I didn't
change anything! Maybe apt-get update and upgrade changed something
recently. I will follow-up if it happens again. Computers are strange!
--
"It doesn't matter what your D&D manual says, you did not get 5
experience points fo
On 3/17/2009 6:59 PM PT, NoOp typed:
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb)
Now what? I don't know how to use this gdb thing. :(
I don't know much more there either but the next step should be entering
"run". Then, for crash bugs, the next command after that would be "bt"
for getting a backtrace.
Leonidas Jones wrote:
flyguy wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
flyguy wrote:
After installing ZA Extreme Security with Forcefield, I discovered that
Forcefield doesn't recognize Seamonkey. Firefox 2 OK; Seamonkey 1 not
OK. I was fooled by all the ads and notifications that said, more less,
"forcefi
On 03/17/2009 06:40 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 03/17/2009 06:15 PM, Phillip Pi wrote:
>>> On 3/17/2009 3:46 PM PT, Jens Hatlak wrote:
>>>
Ant wrote:
> (no debugging symbols found)
> (gdb)
>
> Now what? I don't know how to use this gdb thing. :(
I don't k
NoOp wrote:
On 03/17/2009 06:15 PM, Phillip Pi wrote:
On 3/17/2009 3:46 PM PT, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Ant wrote:
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb)
Now what? I don't know how to use this gdb thing. :(
I don't know much more there either but the next step should be entering
"run". Then, for cras
On 03/17/2009 06:15 PM, Phillip Pi wrote:
> On 3/17/2009 3:46 PM PT, Jens Hatlak wrote:
>
>> Ant wrote:
>>> (no debugging symbols found)
>>> (gdb)
>>>
>>> Now what? I don't know how to use this gdb thing. :(
>>
>> I don't know much more there either but the next step should be entering
>> "run".
On 3/17/2009 3:46 PM PT, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Ant wrote:
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb)
Now what? I don't know how to use this gdb thing. :(
I don't know much more there either but the next step should be entering
"run". Then, for crash bugs, the next command after that would be "bt"
for
On 03/16/2009 08:14 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 03/14/2009 03:29 PM, Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
>> Stéphane Grégoire a tapoté, le 13.03.2009 10:24:
>>>
>>> The test would be nearer to my configuration by printing on the
>>> network. I should also test by cups on the network with a live CD. I
>>> will also
Ant wrote:
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb)
Now what? I don't know how to use this gdb thing. :(
I don't know much more there either but the next step should be entering
"run". Then, for crash bugs, the next command after that would be "bt"
for getting a backtrace. Since in your case SM fr
On 03/17/2009 10:12 AM, NoOp wrote:
>
> Laurie,
>
> I will contact you directly, that way I can send you screenshots of the
> settings. Email address is gl...@sbcglobal.net - so if it ends up in you
> spam filter you will know that it is me.
>
> Gary
>
I've sent you two emails; the second one
On 3/17/2009 10:19 AM PT, Jay Garcia wrote:
The page works just fine here in both FF and SM.
With FF v2.0.0.20 and SeaMonkey v1.1.14? My SeaMonkey v1.1.14 still
freezes on my office machine at work, when doing a print preview on the
same URL I mentioned originally. :(
--
Phillip Pi (aka Ant
W. Watson wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
W. Watson wrote:
I've found that my SM mailer will not accept anything over 10M (See
Subject). However, I've recently gotten 18M wmv files from others. I
guess it's all about one's ISP?
Yeah I don't think there's any practical SM limit, it's up to y
On 16.03.2009 23:42, Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Ant wrote:
On 3/16/2009 12:44 PM PT, Bill Davidsen typed:
No, SM1.1.x will only receive security-updates.
SM2.0 is the the one which gets all the new features.
I would consider a bug allowing a malicious (or mangled)
On 03/17/2009 07:11 AM, laurie erwin wrote:
> Hello NoOp,
> Here are my settings:
> POP Server: pophm.sympatico.ca
> Port: 995
> Authentication: At this point the information does not follow the order you
> outline. There is a box for User Name and in the box is
> laurie.er...@sympatico.ca. Shoul
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
1) Which systems will the new version(s) of SM be available and
supported on? I.e. not just Microsoft operating systems on Intel
cpus. For example: Apple MacIntoshes on their version of U*ix,
Mac G4s, other Unices, Sparc solaris, et.c.
Windows 2000 and higher,
Mac OS 1
Hello NoOp,
Here are my settings:
POP Server: pophm.sympatico.ca
Port: 995
Authentication: At this point the information does not follow the order you
outline. There is a box for User Name and in the box is
laurie.er...@sympatico.ca. Should I add my password and if so, do I leave a
space betwee
FYI. As I expected, I never got an e-mail reply from Office Depot about
its Web site with print preview. :(
--
"An ant on the move does more than a dozing ox." --Mexican Proverb
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phil/Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
| |o o| |Ant's Quality Fo
17 matches
Mail list logo
