Rufus wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder.
I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13.
But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About
On Wed, 25 May 2011 01:17:16 -0700, Keith Whaley wrote:
Assuming that what David said is indeed the case, the Mac version of SM
I have in in fact 2.0.13 and it only SAYs it's 2.0.14 under the About
SeaMonkey icon.
I believe what David said above, because I had downloaded and used
2.0.14
SM 2.0.14 on Mandravia Linux 2009.0 on a HP 6230B Laptop
This afternoon, I had SM running (Mail/News and Chatzilla but *NOT*
browser as far as I can remember) but had finished with it so closed SM.
No problems so far.
This evening, I logged into my ISP, started SM and then started the
NoOp schrieb:
$ memstat -w | grep seamonkey
I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell
how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what
actual memory is being used. All OSes only give you measures of either
virtual memory or some
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Linda wrote:
553 Can't open that file: No such file or directory
What ftp program are you using?
What directory or file are you trying to open?
Is there a typo in your connection attempt?
Could it be that SM is the ftp program trying to load the file ?
If yes,
On 05/25/2011 05:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
$ memstat -w | grep seamonkey
I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell
how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what
actual memory is being used. All OSes only give
WLS wrote:
Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with
Dreamweaver.
I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with
DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer.
If you look in the source of the cited page, you will see various bits
of JavaScript included by
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
WLS wrote:
Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with
Dreamweaver.
I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with
DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer.
If you look in the source of the cited page, you will see various
On 25.05.2011 11:09, WLS wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
WLS wrote:
Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with
Dreamweaver.
I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with
DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer.
If
NoOp schrieb:
memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared
libraries that are using up virtual memory.
The important hing to note here is the last two words: virtual memory.
Processes reserve virtual memory for the chance that they might want to
address that
For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not
loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO
applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it
consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load.
The last time this happened I just gave up,
Sun, 22 May 2011 07:32:50 -0700, /Ant/:
On 5/22/2011 7:27 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Ant wrote:
If so, then is there a way to disable it?
SM 2.1 (ETA next week) will support all accelerations Firefox 4
supports, i.e. D2D, D3D etc. but you can easily disable them all via
Preferences. AFAIK
On 05/25/2011 10:38 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 22 May 2011 07:32:50 -0700, /Ant/:
On 5/22/2011 7:27 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Ant wrote:
If so, then is there a way to disable it?
SM 2.1 (ETA next week) will support all accelerations Firefox 4
supports, i.e. D2D, D3D etc. but you
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder.
I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13.
But, if I double click on it and open it, and I
According to Slashdot, Mozilla Labs is evaluating whether to eliminate
the address area from Firefox. See
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1532246/Mozilla-Labs-the-URL-Bar-Has-To-Go.
The discussion at Slashdot also has some very negative comments about
the elimination of the status bar,
chicagofan wrote:
For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not
loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO
applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it
consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load.
The last time this happened I
WLS wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not
loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO
applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it
consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load.
The last time
chicagofan wrote:
WLS wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not
loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO
applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it
consumes 100% of the CPU... and can
Mike wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
According to Slashdot, Mozilla Labs is evaluating whether to eliminate
the address area from Firefox. See
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1532246/Mozilla-Labs-the-URL-Bar-Has-To-Go.
The discussion at Slashdot also has some very negative comments about
chicagofan wrote:
WLS wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
For the second time, I am having a problem with ONE newsgroup not
loading. It's the same newsgroup and when I click to open it, TWO
applications of the news server appear in my Task Manager and it
consumes 100% of the CPU... and can not load.
The
On 5/25/11 2:55 PM, Mike wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
According to Slashdot, Mozilla Labs is evaluating whether to eliminate
the address area from Firefox. See
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1532246/Mozilla-Labs-the-URL-Bar-Has-To-Go.
The discussion at Slashdot also has some very
On 05/25/2011 03:07 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
...
It is the most Dumba** idea anyone has ever come up with. I have a 17
LapTop and 17 Monitor for my desktop if I can see what I need to
missing a 1/8 of an inch or less, I have more problems than just an
extra 1/8' inch.
...
Ah, but all the
Wed, 25 May 2011 11:17:19 -0700, /NoOp/:
On 05/25/2011 10:38 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Note, Windows XP user currently get less hardware acceleration than
Vista/7 users. The plan is to enable full hardware acceleration on
Windows XP, too, but I don't know which Gecko/Firefox it is
23 matches
Mail list logo
