Jens Hatlak wrote:
Well, even some developers (like me) agree with the above statement, but to be
blunt: That doesn't matter. SM releases depend on the Mozilla platform, which
is where the vast majority of security issues is to be found (since it includes
the rendering engine, protocol
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
You probably received an update because you installed a beta version in
the past, which pinned you to the beta update channel. You can check in
about:config, filtering on app.update.channel.
Would be nice if SeaMonkey included this in the about: page,
Lately I've noticed that if I maximize a YouTube video, the content part
of the screen goes black. I still have controls at the bottom, and they
work, but that's it. At the end, the Replay and other navigation
controls appear in front of the black screen. I can maximize vids from
other
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Lately I've noticed that if I maximize a YouTube video, the content part
of the screen goes black. I still have controls at the bottom, and they
work, but that's it. At the end, the Replay and other navigation
controls appear in front of the black screen. I can maximize
Ant wrote:
On 8/4/2011 6:07 AM PT, Daniel typed:
Is there a(n) option/way or an extension/addon that makes SM v2.0.14+
web browser automatically open web site(s) at/after specific dates and
times in (a) new tab(s)?
Thank you in advance. :)
Sorry, Ant, not sure what you are asking. Are you
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we would
see it anytime soon, even if we
Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:43:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:28:36 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
1. Secure Login https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/secure-login/
It is not packaged as SeaMonkey compatible but is easily patched
to make it so - see
This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105
When I click on Install, I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/25105.user.js
What do I do with that?
--
JD..
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle that
often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable for
business
use. I can dig out the link for anyone who hasn't learned
Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we would
see it anytime
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677010.
Thanks a lot!
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible
arguments that we as a community
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
What is the definition that you are using of 'progress'?
Is it only new features or wrinkles in the UI, or can it be eradication
of existing bugs and misguided UI feature implementations?
Both, even simplifying UI
On 8/6/11 2:19 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Lately I've noticed that if I maximize a YouTube video, the content part
of the screen goes black. I still have controls at the bottom, and they
work, but that's it. At the end, the Replay and other navigation
controls appear in front of the black
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable for business
use. I can dig out the link for anyone who
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we would
see
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable
for business
use. I can dig out the link for
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:28:36 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
1. Secure Login https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/secure-login/
It is not packaged as SeaMonkey compatible but is easily patched
to make it so - see secure_login+sm.diff attached.
That's a good start, but there are
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:
This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105
When I click on Install, I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/25105.user.js
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:
This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105
When I click on Install, I end up here:
Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we would
see it anytime
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we would
see
Ed Mullen schrieb:
Ant wrote:
On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM PT, Ed Mullen typed:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
What does Tab Groups do?
http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/tabcandy/
I think it became standard in Firefox 4.
It has been included in a not yet completely mature
Ant wrote:
On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM PT, Ed Mullen typed:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
What does Tab Groups do?
http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/tabcandy/
I think it became standard in Firefox 4.
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
How come abbreviated is such a long word?
Repeated it below, but whomever is freaking out on were told that
Firefox is not suitable for business use. better sit down and realize
that they were likely told / ordered what they would say. MS owns most
of corporate America...period. And no, that's not a blanket
statement...the likes of
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen schrieb:
Ant wrote:
On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM PT, Ed Mullen typed:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
What does Tab Groups do?
http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/tabcandy/
I think it became standard in Firefox 4.
It has been included in a not yet
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we
would
Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
It is a relatively desired feature for me, but it is a LARGE change,
with LOTS of moving parts and interactions, so I do not suspect we would
see it anytime
NoOp wrote:
On 08/06/2011 02:19 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Lately I've noticed that if I maximize a YouTube video, the content part
of the screen goes black. I still have controls at the bottom, and they
work, but that's it. At the end, the Replay and other navigation
controls appear in
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable
for business
use. I can dig out
Seamonkey 2.2 mail client temporary files deletion failure - On Seamonkey 2.2
and 2.1, it has been noted that the mail client (i.e. Messenger) fails to delete
temporary files such as NSCOPY.TMP and NSEMAIL.EML from the Windows temporary
folder. In previous versions of SM including 1.X and 2.X up
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:07:27 -0500, JD wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:
This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105
When I click
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with
no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.
Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:07:27 -0500, JD wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:
This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105
When I click
On 8/6/2011 11:26 AM PT, Ed Mullen typed:
Ant wrote:
On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM PT, Ed Mullen typed:
Will Firefox's Tab Groups be coming to SeaMonkey?
What does Tab Groups do?
http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/tabcandy/
I think it became standard in Firefox 4.
Interesting and thanks. So group
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Well, the mass of innovation-resistant people posting in those forums is at
least one of the reasons why I moved away my focus from SeaMonkey and work on
making Firefox more stable (in terms of not crashing) now.
Understood, Robert. I can quite see that from the
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:47:15 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Well, the mass of innovation-resistant people posting in those
forums is at least one of the reasons why I moved away my focus
from SeaMonkey and work on making Firefox more stable (in terms of
not
Joe Rotello schrieb:
Firefox updates
This is a SeaMonkey newsgroup, please take Firefox discussions to a
Firefox group.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible
arguments
Don schrieb:
Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?
There is no older version that still is supported.
Unsorted bookmarks are those you file quickly with the new bookmarks
icon at the right of the location bar.
Robert
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Joe Rotello schrieb:
Firefox updates
This is a SeaMonkey newsgroup, please take Firefox discussions to a
Firefox group.
Robert Kaiser
read the title again new 2.3
Now realize that Fire Fox is up to version 5, 6, 7, 8 or whatever.
Its obvious that whom ever started
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb:
Unfortunately, from a user perspective, major
change is rarely welcome, whilst increased security and incremental
bug fixes are universally appreciated.
Right, that's why the major change the web brought to computers was
never appreciated by users,
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Joe Rotello schrieb:
Firefox updates
This is a SeaMonkey newsgroup, please take Firefox discussions to a
Firefox group.
Robert Kaiser
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3,
PhillipJones schrieb:
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
It didn't.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on.
That is just a different numbering system, the rate and size of updates
is very similar.
Version numbers in
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
It didn't.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on.
That is just a different numbering system, the rate and size of updates
is very similar.
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable
for business
Interviewed by CNN on 06/08/2011 20:07, Robert Kaiser told the world:
Version numbers in software are just like coordinate systems in physics:
But necessarily and irrelevant. They're necessary as a reference system
but it's completely irrelevant and arbitrary how you set them.
I agree. At
Interviewed by CNN on 06/08/2011 16:57, Ray_Net told the world:
I agree to start for the future but people need less steps to go to
the future ... not a change every six weeks.
I disagree. Small, incremental steps are easier to get used to. If you
get one new feature at a time, you have six
MCBastos schrieb:
1. Users overwhelmed by all the new features, who ended up not even
*trying* 90% of them. Classic example: Microsoft Office.
Or Firefox 4. ;-)
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very often as
I thought I'd be real sophisticated using SM. So, I deleted cookies,
popups, etc. and decided I'd use Data Manager to set these items as a
couple of my often used applications called for them.
Well, I didn't quite understand the exact procedure for using Data Manager.
BUT, the biggy was that
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable
for
On 8/6/2011 9:22 PM, Stan wrote:
So, I deleted cookies, popups, etc.
What did you do to delete these, by my reading it sounds as though you
deleted them some way, THEN went to use the data manager for teh first
time; which sounds as if you did the deletion another way.
--
~Justin Wood
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable
for
Graham wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Right, that's why the major change the web brought to computers was
never appreciated by users, the major change that Firefox brought
compared to Internet Explorer was never appreciated by users, and why
the major change that smartphones and mobile devices are
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
It didn't.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on.
That is just a different numbering system, the rate and size of updates
is very similar.
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
It didn't.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on.
That is just a different numbering system, the rate and size of updates
is
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
It didn't.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on.
That is just a different numbering system, the rate
Rufus wrote:
*This* surprises the crap out of me though, considering some of what
I've read here elsewhere -
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/mobile/
...and you get it via the Apple App Store.
Off topic for this NG, *but* Firefox Home is *not* Firefox for iPhone,
it is basically Weave/Firefox
56 matches
Mail list logo
