On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;htmlhead(head content
On 03/08/14 03:39, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote:
On 02/08/14 11:33, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote:
I want to say this behavior started around 2.24 but I could be wrong.
I've noticed that when typing into my address bar that it now takes
around 2-3 seconds before autocomplete populates
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/14 11.49:
[snip]
If the schema page is not supposed to be displayed, why is
/script/headbody itemscope
itemtype=http://schema.org/CollectionPage;/body/html
it in the coding at all??
To make it better indexed. This is the only reason for a Rich Snippet link or
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek
Geoff Welsh pounded out :
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
Daniel pounded out :
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor
On 08/03/2014 10:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel
On 8/3/2014 2:14 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
On 8/1/14, Trane Francks tr...@tranefrancks.com wrote:
On 8/1/14 11:19 AM, HenriK wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 7/10/14 5:27 AM +0900, HenriK wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 7/9/14 9:09 AM +0900, Trane Francks wrote:
On 7/9/14 7:28 AM +0900, HenriK wrote:
Shortly after upgrading to SM 2.26,
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote on 08/03/2014 05:22 AM:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM
2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
I know generally what the sqlite d/b is all about, but this particular
one is a mystery. What's more, it makes up nearly half of my profile in
size.
What is its purpose? Can it be eliminated, or at least reduced in size?
If so, how?
Thank you for any insights.
Larry S.
On 8/3/2014 1:26 PM, Larry S. wrote:
I know generally what the sqlite d/b is all about, but this particular
one is a mystery. What's more, it makes up nearly half of my profile in
size.
What is its purpose? Can it be eliminated, or at least reduced in size?
If so, how?
Thank you for
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 17:12:
On 08/03/2014 10:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross
On 08/03/2014 04:26 PM, Larry S. wrote:
I know generally what the sqlite d/b is all about, but this particular
one is a mystery. What's more, it makes up nearly half of my profile in
size.
What is its purpose? Can it be eliminated, or at least reduced in size?
If so, how?
Thank you for any
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/3/2014 1:26 PM, Larry S. wrote:
I know generally what the sqlite d/b is all about, but this particular
one is a mystery. What's more, it makes up nearly half of my profile in
size.
What is its purpose? Can it be eliminated, or at least reduced in size?
If so, how?
WaltS48 wrote:
On 08/03/2014 04:26 PM, Larry S. wrote:
I know generally what the sqlite d/b is all about, but this particular
one is a mystery. What's more, it makes up nearly half of my profile in
size.
What is its purpose? Can it be eliminated, or at least reduced in size?
If so, how?
Thank
On 8/3/2014 3:25 PM, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote:
I know generally what the sqlite d/b is all about, but this particular
one is a mystery. What's more, it makes up nearly half of my profile in
size.
What is its purpose? Can it be eliminated, or at least reduced in size?
If so, how?
21 matches
Mail list logo
