Re: Cannot compile 2.46

>> configure: error: cannot determine icu version number from uvernum.h >> header file Post you .mozconfig file. It looks like it probably tries to use the icu system filens and not the ones provided in the mozilla tree. Did you do a make client.mk checkout in the 2.46 comm-release dir? FRG

Re: Cannot compile 2.46

I'm not sure what my mozconfig is like. How do I find out? I hadn't had this problem before. *phm* On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: > P. H. Madore wrote: > > This is a new issue for me. I was using 2.40 until today. Now I can't use > >

Re: Cannot compile 2.46

P. H. Madore wrote: > This is a new issue for me. I was using 2.40 until today. Now I can't use > anything. Something about "old-configure." Here is the complete > configuration log: > How are you building 2.46? Furthermore, what's the contents of:

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

TCW wrote: > On 3/8/2017 3:47 PM, njoracle wrote: >> TCW wrote: >>> On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

On 3/8/2017 3:47 PM, njoracle wrote: TCW wrote: On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it starts to download any messages from

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

TCW wrote: > On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: >> For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. >> What >> I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds >> before it starts to download any messages from the server. If there are

Re: WYSIWYG printing?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many sites outsmart me by serving their "printer-friendly"

Re: Next version of Seamonkey?

Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: That is the plan. A regular 2.49 might still come before to switch users to the esr channel. If you set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config plugins will still load normally in 52. Its set in our tree. Only removed for 2.50+ because

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it starts to download any messages from the server. If there are no new messages, it still takes 15 seconds to

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it starts to download any messages from the server. If there are no new messages, it

Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it starts to download any messages from the server. If there are no new messages, it still takes 15 seconds to report back that there

Cannot compile 2.46

This is a new issue for me. I was using 2.40 until today. Now I can't use anything. Something about "old-configure." Here is the complete configuration log: Reexecuting in the virtualenv checking for a shell... /bin/sh checking for host system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu checking for target

Re: Next version of Seamonkey?

WaltS48 wrote: On 03/08/2017 07:56 AM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: As I recall, Seamonkey is built on the ESR version of Firefox? I hope that means I will still be able to access Java applets when the new version finally rolls around... No, SeaMonkey is built on the Mainstream version of Firefox.

Re: Next version of Seamonkey?

It might still work for java in 53 but I think i saw removals in 54 for it. Not sure but some things were definitely removed after 52. FRG Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: That is the plan. A regular 2.49 might still come before to switch users to the esr channel. If you set

Re: Next version of Seamonkey?

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: That is the plan. A regular 2.49 might still come before to switch users to the esr channel. If you set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config plugins will still load normally in 52. Its set in our tree. Only removed for 2.50+ because Mozilla started to remove

Re: Next version of Seamonkey?

On 03/08/2017 07:56 AM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: As I recall, Seamonkey is built on the ESR version of Firefox? I hope that means I will still be able to access Java applets when the new version finally rolls around... No, SeaMonkey is built on the Mainstream version of Firefox. The next

Re: Next version of Seamonkey?

That is the plan. A regular 2.49 might still come before to switch users to the esr channel. If you set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config plugins will still load normally in 52. Its set in our tree. Only removed for 2.50+ because Mozilla started to remove some plugin code in 53

Next version of Seamonkey?

As I recall, Seamonkey is built on the ESR version of Firefox? I hope that means I will still be able to access Java applets when the new version finally rolls around... -- Jaime A. Cruz President Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club http://www.nassauwings.org/ AMA District 34