Re: crash at Seamonkey start / helper app missing?

On 28/06/2017 19:08, Abigoven Vandrhall wrote: > Hello, i am using Seamonkey 2.46 in openSUSE Linux 13.1.x64. > > Since some days SM crashes with this message: > > (seamonkey:2626): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property > GnomeProgram::sm-connect after class was initialised > >

Re: Crashes (W10 pro, 64b, desktop)

On 28/06/2017 03:21, bo1953 wrote: > I, too, have a great deal of crashes over the last month or so. Please open a browser window, and type about:crashes in the URL bar. Please copy/paste lines less than 3 months old. Regards. ___ support-seamonkey

Re: Crashes

On 28/06/2017 00:46, Ken Rudolph wrote: > SM 2.46 (Win-10) has developed the annoying habit of crashing, and > recently way too often. Please open a browser window, and type about:crashes in the URL bar. Please copy/paste lines less than 3 months old. Regards.

Re: Breakpoint Exception

On 26/06/2017 22:25, Tom Pamin wrote: > On shutdown several times I got a breakpoint exception error for plugin > container.exe. My PC then shutdown normally. I've read this has to do > with Firefox, so maybe SM too. Anyone know how to fix this? Are you saying you have this issue when using

Re: page not found

On 21/06/2017 02:44, WaltS48 wrote: > On 6/20/17 8:32 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > >> Okay, thanks to the volunteers who do Seamonkey. >> >> But will someone PLEASE fix the "Page not found" error whenever SM >> updates and reboots? It is just annoying and unprofessional. >> >> I mean, c'mon! It's a

Re: what's going on with internet video?

On 09/06/2017 22:41, Lemuel Johnson wrote: > On 6/8/2017 7:41 AM, Bill Spikowski wrote: >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> null wrote: >>> Running on XP, Seamonkey 2.46 will no longer display internet videos from Facebook and many news sites. Neither will Firefox 52.0.2.

Re: Site Blocked?

On 08/06/2017 15:07, Richmond wrote: > Tom Pamin wrote: >> Mason83 wrote: >>> On 08/06/2017 12:30, Tom Pamin wrote: >>>> Why does Seamonkey block this site, and IE doesn't? >>>> https://www.hayneedle.com/ >>> >>> This is a bit vague

Re: Site Blocked?

On 08/06/2017 12:30, Tom Pamin wrote: > Why does Seamonkey block this site, and IE doesn't? > https://www.hayneedle.com/ This is a bit vague. What are the symptoms? error messages? Do you just get a blank screen? Perhaps you can publish a screen shot? That would help people help you. FWIW, it

Re: Filter For Value of "X-Apparently-To:" Not Equal to "To:"

On 02/06/2017 15:36, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > I have been getting spam from people who have my real email address stored in > "X-Apparently-To:" but > they have their own email address stored in "To:". I am looking for a way to > create a filter that > moves the email to Trash whenever the value

Re: Very Annoying Advertisements - Can SM Block Them ?

On 30/05/2017 11:01, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > >> Just install an Adblocker. >> >> Adblock Plus 2.9 seems to be broken right now. Why it is still >> distributed is beyond me. 2.8.2 works. uBlock Origin should also work >> fine. > > I have ABP 2.8.2, which as you say

Re: Very Annoying Advertisements - Can SM Block Them ?

On 30/05/2017 07:31, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Just install an Adblocker. > > Adblock Plus 2.9 seems to be broken right now. Why it is still distributed is > beyond me. 2.8.2 works. uBlock Origin should also work fine. I noticed that ABP was acting strange. Claiming this is my first install.

Re: New user - with questions

On 27/05/2017 01:16, joegwinn wrote: > 2. Is there a log file that records the chit-chat between SM and the > email and/or news servers. This is essential for troubleshooting > problems like why my attempts to sent email never complete. https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging

Re: Something missing in the UI

On 15/05/2017 22:18, Stefan Blumenrath wrote: > Hi, > no idea what happened, but I somehow lost the "thing to pull to change > the size of the message window"... > > To make clear, what I miss, I add a picture: > > > How can I get it back? Does playing

Re: Search Does NOT !

On 15/05/2017 22:26, Mozillian wrote: > I checked the newsgroups I want to search for off-line searches. > > Nothing seemed to happen. > > I went to search in the Body of the messages of one of the checked > newsgroups and it said not found. > > WHY ??? > > What else do I have to do ? > >

Re: Extract Subject, Date, and Message-ID from an mbox file

On 15/05/2017 20:25, Richard Owlett wrote: > I have some emails sorted into several folders. > For each folder I need a list of date, subject, and message id. > There's got to be a tool for that and I'm just not using right search terms. > I haven't worked that problem in decades. Not all

Re: Fresh Win2K problems..

On 14/05/2017 08:10, Yamo' wrote: > Robert Baer a écrit le 12/05/2017 à 11:50 on alt.computer and > mozilla.support.seamonkey : >> Robert Baer wrote: >>> My Win2k got slower and slower, so.. >>> I took a hard drive, wiped it and installed Win2K SP2, then installed SP4. >>> Installed my various

Re: signature delimiter

On 09/04/2017 23:00, Ray_Net wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher had TWO signatures preceded each one by a correct sig > delimiter. I don't think so. He has DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE for the first, and DASH DASH NEWLINE for the second. Only the first one is a valid delimiter. Regards.

Re: Can anyone repro this: odd video playback issue

On 09/04/2017 20:03, Ray_Net wrote: > Daniel wrote on 09-04-17 11:07: >> On 9/04/2017 6:53 PM, Mason83 wrote: >>> On 09/04/2017 02:53, TCW wrote: >>>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:03:18 -0400, "Paul B. Gallagher" >>>> <pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com

Re: Can anyone repro this: odd video playback issue

On 09/04/2017 02:53, TCW wrote: > On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:03:18 -0400, "Paul B. Gallagher" > wrote: > >> TCW wrote: >> >>> Hmm, so how the heck is it that this particular video acts wonky but >>> a whole slew of others I watched on CNN had zero issue on the exact

Re: Can anyone repro this: odd video playback issue

On 07/04/2017 15:55, TCW wrote: > On a few occasions, I get a weird playback issue on video on CNN. Here > is one example: https://tinyurl.com/kbrfoht > > The video controls and such are all munged. I'm on Adrian's 2.50 build > but I've seen it once or twice with Adrian's 2.49. > > The error

Re: memory leaks in SeaMonkey 2.48

On 28/03/2017 20:58, Mason83 wrote: > On 28/03/2017 18:09, David H. Durgee wrote: > >> Looking at the memory report in the browser I see the following: >> >>└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!] >> >> The memory figure is highlighted i

Re: memory leaks in SeaMonkey 2.48

On 28/03/2017 18:09, David H. Durgee wrote: > Looking at the memory report in the browser I see the following: > >└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!] > > The memory figure is highlighted in red, so I assume this is a problem. > I have the memory report saved and can make

Re: RESOLVED - Re: Problem w/AOL Mail in SM 2.46 W10 Pro

On 24/03/2017 02:58, Ed Mullen wrote: > My comment had nothing to do with his email address or "Username" - it > had to do with Usenet convention for a "signature delimiter". > > His is incorrect - three dashes and no space. Convention is two dashes > and one space. Do you notice that proper

Re: Weird error from viki.com

On 19/02/2017 01:46, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Anyone else seeing this? > > Since this morning, if I try to visit I get only > this error message: > > {"error":"not found","vcode":8500} Weird. WFM. Some kind of geo-location + browser sniffing at play? Korean

Re: I am going to ask a question that will seem dumb to a number of you...

On 05/02/2017 21:31, Pat Connors wrote: > "SeaMonkey 2.46 is now available for openSUSE Leap 42.1 and Leap 42.2. > > " > > Okay, I am now using 2.48 after using 2.47 (Adrian builds). I have had > no problems with

Re: Status of official 2.48 release

On 03/02/2017 07:42, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > On 02.02.17 21:21, Mason83 wrote: >> What is the status for the official 2.48 release? > > Hello, > > WIP, details see here > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1336310>. There

Status of official 2.48 release

Hello, What is the status for the official 2.48 release? There have been no updates to the SM blog: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/ If I update to akalla's 2.48, it should be 100% compatible with the official release, right? Regards. ___

Re: When SeaMonkey is too powerful/flexible/???

On 31/01/2017 16:54, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm looking for a "HTML Viewer/Editor" *NOT* a browser. > The closest I've seen is the Composer portion of SeaMonkey. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTML_editors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_HTML_editors

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

On 31/01/2017 12:52, Richmond wrote: > "Paul in Houston, TX" writes: > >> It would be nice to read the page without needing JS but the page is >> calling up the text from somewhere else using JS. With out JS there >> is no text, as confirmed by looking at the page source. >

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

On 31/01/2017 00:14, WaltS48 wrote: > On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote: >> If I visit this page: >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ >> >> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

On 31/01/2017 00:05, Mason83 wrote: > On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote: >> If I visit this page: >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ >> >> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascr

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote: > If I visit this page: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ > > with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank > page. However if I visit it with a

Re: THANKS A LOT - Re: BIG IMAGE

On 27/01/2017 22:40, Lucas Levrel wrote: > Le 27 janvier 2017, à 19:32, Mason83 a écrit : > >> Would you say "presque mieux" is equivalent to >> "presque aussi bien/bon" ? > > No. There is an intended, amusing contradiction in "presque mieux&q

Re: THANKS A LOT - Re: BIG IMAGE

On 27/01/2017 17:54, Ray_Net wrote: > Mason83 wrote on 27-01-17 16:08: >> On 27/01/2017 15:10, Ray_Net wrote: >> >>> then X is nearly better than >> >> "nearly better" is a hard concept to grasp ;-) > > Sorry, my mother language is french and I u

Re: THANKS A LOT - Re: BIG IMAGE

On 27/01/2017 15:10, Ray_Net wrote: > then X is nearly better than "nearly better" is a hard concept to grasp ;-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail problem moving from Lenovo T43 to Lenovo T430

On 20/01/2017 16:17, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 1/20/2017 8:12 AM, Mason83 wrote: > >> Do you have local network storage available? (NAS, NFS server, etc). > > If I currently had a functioning LAN, the whole question would be > moot <*LOL*> I'm not seeing what's wo

Re: Mail problem moving from Lenovo T43 to Lenovo T430

On 20/01/2017 12:47, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 1/19/2017 4:13 PM, Mason83 wrote: >> On 19/01/2017 12:43, Richard Owlett wrote: >> >>> The immediate problem revolves around the differing screen aspect >>> ratios. The screen of the T430 is shorter by ~1.5 inches

Re: Mail problem moving from Lenovo T43 to Lenovo T430

On 19/01/2017 12:43, Richard Owlett wrote: > The immediate problem revolves around the differing screen aspect > ratios. The screen of the T430 is shorter by ~1.5 inches while > maintaining an ~14 inch diagonal. > > While researching the various layouts SeaMonkey can use, I would > like to

Re: Crashes

On 16/01/2017 18:08, JAS wrote: > I have had several crashes lately and wonder if someone can decipher the > crash reports? Using SM 2.48 on Win 7 Pro > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 > SeaMonkey/2.48 - Build ID: 20161208025245 > >

Re: Crashes

On 17/01/2017 19:46, TCW wrote: > From your crash report: Available Physical Memory: 5,169,344,512 bytes > (4.81 GB)huh? How is this even possible? Available physical memory > is at 4.81GB on x86? Do you have 8GB installed on an x86 machine? PAE > running? I see you page file is at 12GB

Re: Mail Always Expanded

On 14/01/2017 19:13, DoctorBill wrote: > Somehow, when I go to the Mail, any messages that > are stacked (+) are all unstacked (-) when I open. > > They used to be compressed (+) and I can't figure > out how to set the mail so they stay stacked. > Is there a 'toggle' for that ? > > Help ?

Re: SM 2.46 hangs trying to print

On 02/01/2017 16:02, Gerry Hickman wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> When you kill SM with "End Task", SM generates a stack dump. >> What do you have in about:crashes ? > > There's only two reports from 2014 and 2015, nothing from today. > It was a "hang&

Re: Seamonkey 2.46 in the Ubuntuzilla repository

On 30/12/2016 16:10, NFN Smith wrote: > Hooray! I just updated my Ubuntu box, shortly after you posted your > announcement. I was really hoping that I wouldn't have to build from a > tarball. As Walt mentions, no building involved. Just 'tar xf foo.tar.bz2' and it's functional.

Re: SM 2.46 hangs trying to print

On 02/01/2017 13:50, Gerry Hickman wrote: > Windows 7, SM 2.46 > I've been auto-updated to 2.46, and trying to print a web page now > causes a complete hang - only way out is to "end task" > > This happened with two different pages within > https://online.hmrc.gov.uk/ > > I've never had issues

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

On 31/12/2016 03:39, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > bern...@nospam.com wrote: >> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >> works perfect. Any ideas? > Just a thought...When I open the data manager for the

Re: How to test on NON-SSE2 (was Re: How to test 2.49 on SSE2)

On 30/12/2016 12:59, Richmond wrote: > I mistyped. > > Richmond writes: > >> I've compiled 2.49a2 on my AMD Athlon XP. (It took about 10 hours). Is >> there a test I can do to check the parts which would use SSE2? >> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

On 26/12/2016 20:41, SamuelS wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 24/12/2016 14:09, SamuelS wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I updated to 2.46 from 2.40 on my Laptop using Win Business Vista 2, I >>> Am not able to retrieve/see over 18 months of email

Re: Rendering engines Servo vs Gecko

On 25/12/2016 06:00, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > Does anyone know if the new Mozilla Servo rendering engine will be > replacing the Gecko rendering engine in SeaMonkey? Maybe they discuss that in their blog? https://blog.servo.org/ ___ support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

On 24/12/2016 14:09, SamuelS wrote: > Hello all, > > I updated to 2.46 from 2.40 on my Laptop using Win Business Vista 2, I > Am not able to retrieve/see over 18 months of email for only one account. > > I have reverted to SM 2.40 and still not able to find the messages... > > Is this lost

Re: New Javascript Free Tab?

On 26/12/2016 12:25, Richmond wrote: > I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a > new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag > would need to be per tab. > > I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks, > like

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 22/12/2016 13:10, Ant wrote: > Ditto, but I am not getting any internal updates for v2.46 in my updated > 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's SM v2.40 installation. What about the rest of you? https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/22/tears-of-joy/ ewong wrote: > Seriously though... I do have one

Re: Address Book Contacts Disappeared

On 16/12/2016 22:31, Brian Mailman wrote: > Seamonkey 2.40 > Windows 10 > > Help, please. I just used the address book to send out an invitation > (if anyone doesn't recognize the word, it's where "invite" as a noun > came from) with a stack of bccs. > > Today I opened it and every contact

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

On 16/12/2016 10:02, Piscium wrote: > Question: "about:buildconfig" tells me that gcc v. 4.8.5 was used to > build SM. gcc 4.8.5 is (arguably) old as gcc 4.8.0, the first version > in that series, was released in March 22, 2013, 3.5 years ago. > > Considering that FF is developed at breakneck

Re: Meeting Notes

On 10/12/2016 15:20, WaltS48 wrote: > On 12/10/2016 05:22 AM, Mason83 wrote: >> On 13/10/2016 17:31, Mason83 wrote: >> >>> https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/ states: >>> >>>> If you are wondering why no new notes have been posted here >&g

Re: SM update status...

On 10/12/2016 13:02, Richmond wrote: > Mason83 <root@dom.invalid> writes: > >> I'm not surprised you can't upgrade within SM, because you untarred >> as root, but run as regular user. So SM doesn't have permission to >> trash its installation folder. > > Is i

Re: no plugins with current SM version

On 10/12/2016 11:16, Piscium wrote: > On 9 December 2016 at 08:03, Mason83 <root@dom.invalid> wrote: >> On 09/12/2016 08:21, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >>> Plugin support is discontined in Gecko / Firefox 52 which is the base of >>> SeaMonkey. This was alrweady the

Re: Meeting Notes

: > It is marked as a confidential security bug and so you can only view it > if you are on the cc list or have the appropriate rights. > > FRG > > Mason83 wrote: >> On 13/10/2016 17:31, Mason83 wrote: >> >>> https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/ states: >>>

Re: Meeting Notes

On 13/10/2016 17:31, Mason83 wrote: > https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/ states: > >> If you are wondering why no new notes have been posted here >> for a long time, or if you want these postings to resume, >> see bug 1275636 and bug 1300427. > > https://bug

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 09/12/2016 20:10, EE wrote: > If I search in my URL bar, I get whatever engine is selected in the > searchbar. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Patch fixing mnenhy

On 09/12/2016 20:57, John Duncan wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> It is likely that the original author has stopped working on that >> add-on. However, someone else picked up the ball: >> >> https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26256#c2 >> https://b

Re: SM update status...

On 09/12/2016 15:31, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> One thing to watch out for is when Ubuntuzilla eventually >> puts out a new release. This is likely to overwrite your >> "custom" SM package. I don't have a good solution for that. > > Inte

Re: no plugins with current SM version

On 09/12/2016 08:21, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Plugin support is discontined in Gecko / Firefox 52 which is the base of > SeaMonkey. This was alrweady the case with 64 bit Windows versions for > some time. Only Flash will work. All other plugings will no longer work. > Nothing we / SeaMonkey

Re: SM update status...

On 09/12/2016 02:17, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: >>> Mason83 wrote: >>>> On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

On 08/12/2016 13:09, TCW wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:14:55 +0800, Edmund Wong wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Fwiw.. please *do* note that those 2.46 candidate builds are just >> test builds. While it does have the sec fix, it isn't the official >> candidate until I start spinning build 7. >> >> Edmund

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 08/12/2016 20:11, EE wrote: > Mr. Ed wrote: >> On 12/07/16 3:32 PM, Mason83 wrote: >>> On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote: >>>> >>>>> 1) I was using the StartPage search engine

Re: SM update status...

On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: >> >>> I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the >>> ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repository set up on my system >

Re: SM update status...

On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: > I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the > ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repository set up on my system > and could install your unofficial build from a .deb by adding it there > and using the update tools.

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote: > On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote: > >> 1) I was using the StartPage search engine for searches done directly >> in the location bar. It now goes to duckduckgo. > > That also happens in SM 2.47 (64 bit). Build identifier: 2016120

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 07/12/2016 20:37, TCW wrote: > On 12/7/2016 1:04 PM, Mason83 wrote: >> On 07/12/2016 19:04, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> >>> If you have a working build environment save yourself the trouble and >>> just build from comm-release. 2.47 is stable but requires VS

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 07/12/2016 16:13, Richmond wrote: > diff -e firefox-50.0.1/dom/smil/nsSMILTimeContainer.cpp > firefox-50.0.2/dom/smil/nsSMILTimeContainer.cpp Hold up! Hold up! Who uses diff -e ?! I'm used to diff -u and diff -c (to a lesser extent) Are there situations where you feel diff -e is better

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 07/12/2016 18:07, TCW wrote: > Even if you get the right snippet of code that fixes the issue, it may > depend on other bits of code and fall over. This is an instance where > grafting in the code probably will fail. I disagree. The whole point of having a source control system like

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 07/12/2016 19:04, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > If you have a working build environment save yourself the trouble and > just build from comm-release. 2.47 is stable but requires VS2015 Update 3. > > Full build will take around 3h to 5h on my Thinkpad X200s and 30 to 40 > minutes on my

Re: Error after upgrade to 2.40

On 07/12/2016 01:05, datux2...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear all, > anybody can help me.. i get this error after upgrade to 2.40. > I do clean install, and do reinstall, but the problem still occur. In the URL bar, type about:crashes Paste the top 3 Report IDs. Regards.

Re: Right-Click on a point of the map in GoogleMaps

On 07/12/2016 08:51, Ray_Net wrote: > I WAS happy, but now, with my new pc under Windows10 - I still have the > problem evenwhile using the ALT key. > > How to eliminate the SM context menu to be able to access the GoogleMaps > context menu ? Does ESC/ECHAP make the context menu go away?

Re: 64-bit versions of SeaMonkey

On 05/12/2016 02:41, TCW wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:12:33 -0600, S Slicer wrote: > >> I had been using SeaMonkey 32-bit version 2.40 successfully on Windows >> 10 Pro 64-bit, then switched to SeaMonkey 64-bit version 2.45. Both >> worked very well for me. Then while

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 20:17, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Yes. Patch might still need some work but I left positive feedback. Should be > fixed soon with soon not meaning tomorrow :) Cool. I don't post much to the problem Usenet server, but if need be, I have a work-around: Send Later, then close SM,

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 18:57, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > As Mason83 said not all servers complain about it or we would have > caught it earlier. Now tracked in bug 1322054. In SeaMonkey this > happens even with a dictionary installed fwiw. Jorg seems to think that a dictionary changes someth

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 17:23, Mason83 wrote: > On 04/12/2016 14:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > >> This is caused by Bug 1169184. I think a check there is incomplete. Not much >> you >> can do about it right now. If I am right and a fix is ready it will be >> included in

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 17:20, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > >> This is caused by Bug 1169184. I think a check there is incomplete. >> Not much you can do about it right now. If I am right and a fix is >> ready it will be included in a future 2.47. > > So no workaround? > > If

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 14:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > This is caused by Bug 1169184. I think a check there is incomplete. Not much > you > can do about it right now. If I am right and a fix is ready it will be > included in > a future 2.47. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169184

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 09:52, Mason83 wrote: > I have set "Fallback Text Encoding" and the other to > "Default for Current Locale" which sets > mailnews.send_default_charset=UTF-8 > mailnews.view_default_charset=ISO-8859-1 After restarting SM. ___

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 04:43, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > And what are your settings under Edit | Preferences | Mail & Newsgroups | > Text encoding? Good idea. Nothing is set. Scanning about:config ... mail.default_charsets.migrated=1 mailnews.reply_in_default_charset=true

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 09:33, Mason83 wrote: > On 04/12/2016 04:43, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > >> As you say downthread, the field is present but empty. >> >> What happens if you manually select a language (View | Encoding in the >> composition window)? Does SM 2.47

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 04/12/2016 04:43, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > As you say downthread, the field is present but empty. > > What happens if you manually select a language (View | Encoding in the > composition window)? Does SM 2.47 fill the field, or still leave it blank? Let's see... I'm setting Options > Text

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 03/12/2016 23:39, Mason83 wrote: > On 03/12/2016 23:34, Mason83 wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm seeing this error on a different Usenet server: >> >> A News (NNTP) error occurred: 441 437 No colon-space in "Content-Language:" >> header &g

Re: Weird error on another Usenet server

On 03/12/2016 23:34, Mason83 wrote: > Hello, > > I'm seeing this error on a different Usenet server: > > A News (NNTP) error occurred: 441 437 No colon-space in "Content-Language:" > header > > Sending of the message failed. > > The message could not

Weird error on another Usenet server

Hello, I'm seeing this error on a different Usenet server: A News (NNTP) error occurred: 441 437 No colon-space in "Content-Language:" header Sending of the message failed. The message could not be posted because connecting to the news server failed. The server may be unavailable or is

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and SVG exploit

On 03/12/2016 20:47, Pat Connors wrote: > I am so confused! > > I get it that 2.40 SeaMonkey has some problems, not sure what they are > other than vulnerabilities. Someone said to 'Turn off javascript' but > do not know how to do so. > > Others are saying to use a later release not yet on

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and SVG exploit

On 03/12/2016 10:10, Ant wrote: > Is it confirmed that v2.40 will get a patch? Also, I suppose even SM 2.47 is vulnerable? Or was that the reason for the Dec 1 update, Adrian? Regards. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Google Earth's Time Lapse fails to work correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40? Dang send referers!

On 02/12/2016 07:59, Ant wrote: > On 12/1/2016 7:07 PM, Ant wrote: >> https://earthengine.google.com/timelapse/ >> >> Or just in mine? 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's IE11 web browser worked though. >> What about the rest of you? > > OK, I figured it out. Dang send referers! I suggest sending fake

Re: TLS certificate for www.mozdev.org expired on 11/11

On 23/11/2016 16:58, David E. Ross wrote: > On 11/22/2016 11:43 PM, Mason83 wrote [in part]: > >> As discussed yesterday on IRC. >> >> When I try to connect to https://www.mozdev.org/ >> I receive the following error message: >> >> www.mozde

TLS certificate for www.mozdev.org expired on 11/11

Hello, As discussed yesterday on IRC. When I try to connect to https://www.mozdev.org/ I receive the following error message: www.mozdev.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate expired on 2016-11-11 17:39:38 GMT Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE I tried sending an

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 22/11/2016 18:24, Mason83 wrote: > On 22/11/2016 17:44, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > >> No the issue was I misread your original post. You were not offering >> alternatives but was also asking for alternative. Sorry. > > Maybe there is no need to find

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 22/11/2016 17:44, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > No the issue was I misread your original post. You were not offering > alternatives but was also asking for alternative. Sorry. Maybe there is no need to find alternatives for mnenhy. Independently, two developers have provided an updated

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 22/11/2016 15:54, TCW wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:08:09 +0100, Mason83 wrote: > >> On 20/11/2016 20:50, Mason83 wrote: >>> On 20/11/2016 20:47, Mason83 wrote: >>>> On 20/11/2016 20:44, Mason83 wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2) When

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 22/11/2016 15:23, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 21/11/2016 23:50, Jonathan N. Little wrote: >> >>> Mason83 wrote: >>> >>>> Are you aware of other extensions which provide these features: >>>> >>>> 1) Message

Ignore Subthread has never fully worked

Hello, As far back as I remember, the feature "Ignore Subthread" has never fully worked. I was hoping that jumping from SM 2.40 to SM 2.46 would magically include a fix ;-) "Ignore Subthread" works incorrectly https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=799040 I suppose a fix is unlikely now

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 22/11/2016 05:02, Petr Voralek wrote: >Hello! > > On Sunday, 20.11.2016 20:44(+0100) *Mason83* wrote, and I quote (in part): > >> 2) When I display an email or NG message, the header pane was empty. >> Removing the Mnenhy add-on seems to have fixed that.

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 21/11/2016 23:50, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> Are you aware of other extensions which provide these features: >> >> 1) Message-ID Search >> 2) Display Custom Headers/X-Faces (I can live without that) >> 3) inline decoding o

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 20/11/2016 21:57, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:44:29 +0100, Mason83 wrote: > >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm trying out this version: >>> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows3

<    1   2   3   4   >