Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-18 Thread Devils_Advocate
"Justin Wood (Callek)" wrote : > On 1/17/2010 2:28 AM, Devils_Advocate wrote: >> Martin Freitag wrote : >> >> I'd love to, but there's no way of migrating to it from 1.1.18 >>> >>> >>> SM migrates your profile after install on first startup. >>> If t doesn't try to start migration ma

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-17 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 1/17/2010 2:28 AM, Devils_Advocate wrote: Martin Freitag wrote : I'd love to, but there's no way of migrating to it from 1.1.18 SM migrates your profile after install on first startup. If t doesn't try to start migration manually: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonke

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-17 Thread intrudere
On 9 ene, 17:36, "Devils_Advocate" wrote: > Sigo recibiendo las páginas en blanco en varios sitios utilizando Firefox, > entonces > tiene que abrir Internet Explorer o Firefox y probar de nuevo. > > SM es un producto de morir que debo dejar de usar ya? try refresh page or string agent in about:c

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-16 Thread Devils_Advocate
Martin Freitag wrote : >> >> I'd love to, but there's no way of migrating to it from 1.1.18 > > > SM migrates your profile after install on first startup. > If t doesn't try to start migration manually: > http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey > regards > > Martin BTDT; "be

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-15 Thread Martin Freitag
Devils_Advocate schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote : Devils_Advocate schrieb: Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? SeaMonkey 2.x is well-alive and should work well with most websites out there, I very rarely have any problems. SeaMonkey 1.x is mostly dead though and if

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-14 Thread Devils_Advocate
Robert Kaiser wrote : > Devils_Advocate schrieb: >> Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? > > SeaMonkey 2.x is well-alive and should work well with most websites out > there, I very rarely have any problems. > > SeaMonkey 1.x is mostly dead tho

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-13 Thread Benoit Renard
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There a

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Benoit Renard wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-12 Thread Benoit Renard
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are putting up "Web pages"

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-12 Thread Arne
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 12/1/2010 01:43, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: Of course, some reported "errors" are just plain silly: Line 9, Column 47: Attribute "BORDER" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "border"? (from a frameset declaration) Well, I didn't see the origin

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-12 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 12/1/2010 01:43, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: > Of course, some reported "errors" are just plain silly: > > Line 9, Column 47: Attribute "BORDER" is not a valid attribute. Did you > mean "border"? > > (from a frameset declaration) Well, I didn't see the original page

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-11 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
NoOp wrote: On 01/09/2010 04:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-11 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are putting up "Web pages" but who have NO IDEA what

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
ive you AN ERROR MESSAGE stating what is needed. :Is SM a dying product? : No, but the number of folks who understand HOW MANY ways a webmaster can screw up a web site has always been a tiny proportion of users. ...and if a site owner has built a site in a way that it will ONLY work with ONE browser

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread JeffM
ountwnz2dnuvz_jji4...@mozilla.org Again, a *smart* webmaster / site builder would give you AN ERROR MESSAGE stating what is needed. :Is SM a dying product? : No, but the number of folks who understand HOW MANY ways a webmaster can screw up a web site has always been a tiny proportion of users. .

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Daniel wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffMwrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open I

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Devils_Advocate wrote: Phillip Jones wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: "Rinaldi J. Montessi"wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. Is SM a dying prod

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Devils_Advocate schrieb: Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? SeaMonkey 2.x is well-alive and should work well with most websites out there, I very rarely have any problems. SeaMonkey 1.x is mostly dead though and if you are still using those versions, you probably

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Martin Freitag
Jesse Molina schrieb: Here is a real-word-right-now example of incompatibility with Seamonkey. Earlier today I tried to sell an item on eBay but they use some goofy Javascript that doesn't work with Seamonkey. As a result, I am unable to add pictures to the listing, or save the listing as a tem

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 1/10/2010 2:10 AM, NoOp typed the following: > On 01/09/2010 07:03 PM, BeeNeR wrote: > .. >> Hmm - only getting the top line - rest of the page is blank (or white on > > And are do you have cookies turned on? > > The site has nothing to do with browser sniffing etc. It works just fine

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Daniel
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread NoOp
On 01/09/2010 07:03 PM, BeeNeR wrote: .. > Hmm - only getting the top line - rest of the page is blank (or white on And are do you have cookies turned on? The site has nothing to do with browser sniffing etc. It works just fine in SeaMonkey (1.1.18, 2.0.1, 2.0.3pre etc). But it will not display t

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Jesse Molina
ote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? No. It's an excellent product that's too advanced for some putzy sites. If it can

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Devils_Advocate
Phillip Jones wrote : > Devils_Advocate wrote: >> "Rinaldi J. Montessi" wrote : >> >>> Devils_Advocate wrote: >>>> I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >>>> then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefo

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Paul
Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq Works good for me.

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 1/9/2010 8:01 PM, Leonidas Jones typed the following: > Devils_Advocate wrote: >> JeffM wrote : >> >>> Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >>> I note

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Phillip Jones
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://w

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Phillip Jones
Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq came up fine for me,

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Phillip Jones
Devils_Advocate wrote: "Rinaldi J. Montessi" wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? No

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: >> On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: >>> JeffM wrote : >>> Devils_Advocate wrote: > I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, > then I have to open Internet Explore

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: >> JeffM wrote : >> >>> Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >>> I note tha

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: > JeffM wrote : > >> Devils_Advocate wrote: >>> I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >>> then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >>> >> I note that you didn't give an example URL. > > http://www.

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 9/1/2010 22:41, Devils_Advocate told the world: > > http://www.efax.com/help/faq > Funny, I could get into the site with no problem. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... BOF

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread bsalisbu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Devils_Advocate wrote: > JeffM wrote : > >> Devils_Advocate wrote: >>> I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >>> then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >>> >> I note that you didn't give an exa

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Leonidas Jones
Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq There are a lot of b

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread NoOp
On 01/09/2010 04:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: > JeffM wrote : > >> Devils_Advocate wrote: >>>I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >>>then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >>> >> I note that you didn't give an example URL. > > http://www

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Devils_Advocate
JeffM wrote : > Devils_Advocate wrote: >>I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >>then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >> > I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq > There are a lot of bozos who are putti

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Devils_Advocate
"Rinaldi J. Montessi" wrote : > Devils_Advocate wrote: >> I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >> then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. >> >> Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread JD
Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? How about a couple of links to the pages that come up blank? -- JD

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread JeffM
Devils_Advocate wrote: >I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, >then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. > I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are putting up "Web pages" but who have NO IDEA what they are doin

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Rinaldi J. Montessi
Devils_Advocate wrote: > I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I > have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. > > Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? No. It's an excellent product that's too a

Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-09 Thread Devils_Advocate
I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey