Jesse Molina wrote:
Follow-up on this issue from last month.
I had posted about using Seamonkey on Linux. I use mail and browser and
have a lot of tabs open and I almost never reboot or restart Seamonkey
unless I need to. I was finding that Seamonkey was really dragging with
the amount of load
Thanks for the report. I will check my own setup and see what the cause
might be.
It could be one of my addons not working correctly.
Daniel wrote:
Google Maps works for me, SM 2.8 on Mandriva Linux 2007!
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page =
Follow-up on this issue from last month.
I had posted about using Seamonkey on Linux. I use mail and browser and
have a lot of tabs open and I almost never reboot or restart Seamonkey
unless I need to. I was finding that Seamonkey was really dragging with
the amount of load I was putting
Jesse Molina wrote:
Follow-up on this issue from last month.
I had posted about using Seamonkey on Linux. I use mail and browser and
have a lot of tabs open and I almost never reboot or restart Seamonkey
unless I need to. I was finding that Seamonkey was really dragging with
the amount of load
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows
NoOp wrote:
On 02/27/2012 02:28 AM, Daniel wrote:
...
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
Very few problems on either!
If you mean:
From: Danielsnip
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2)
Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
from your other post. The WOW64[1] in your URI
Daniel wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a
On 02/29/2012 05:13 AM, Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 02/27/2012 02:28 AM, Daniel wrote:
...
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
Very few problems on either!
If you mean:
From: Danielsnip
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2)
Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for
Jesse Molina wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jesse, the SeaMonkey Council has been releasing an unsupported 64bit
SeaMonkey since back in the SM 1.x.x daysI am posting this reply
using SM 64bit on my Mandriva Linux!!
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
Very few problems on either!
Check out
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows binary ?
All I see under Contributed builds is as follows :
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows binary ?
All I see under Contributed
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out Contributed Builds at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows binary ?
All I see
Jim Taylor wrote:
I haven't seen a 64 bit windows build since 2.0. That doesn't
mean there hasn't been one, just that I haven't noticed one. The
win64 2.0 is available at http://wiki.mozilla-x86-64.com/Download
Thank you, Jim. If 64-bit development is not tracking 32-bit
from the
On 02/27/2012 02:28 AM, Daniel wrote:
...
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
Very few problems on either!
If you mean:
From: Daniel snip
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2)
Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
from your other post. The WOW64[1] in your URI tells me
Jesse Molina wrote:
I have 16GB of RAM, very modern multi-core CPU etc. Seamonkey
only goes up to 2GB before it maxes out.
Seamonkey is currently a 32-bit application; are you running
a 32-bit or 64-bit O/S, and if the former, are you using PAE,
4GT or AWE ? Only 4GT is likely to be of
Hi. I am currently on a 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel. I am aware that
Seamonkey is only 32 bit and of the 2GB limitation, and I've seen it max
out at 2GB many times before.
I regret that it may be some time... if ever, that we see Seamonkey go
64bit. So much old code in there.
Philip
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Jesse Molina wrote:
I have 16GB of RAM, very modern multi-core CPU etc. Seamonkey
only goes up to 2GB before it maxes out.
Seamonkey is currently a 32-bit application; are you running
a 32-bit or 64-bit O/S, and if the former, are you using PAE,
4GT or AWE ? Only 4GT
Jesse Molina wrote:
Hi. I am currently on a 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel. I am aware that
Seamonkey is only 32 bit and of the 2GB limitation, and I've seen it max
out at 2GB many times before.
I regret that it may be some time... if ever, that we see Seamonkey go
64bit. So much old code in there.
Jesse Molina wrote:
Hi. I am currently on a 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel. I am aware that
Seamonkey is only 32 bit and of the 2GB limitation, and I've seen it max
out at 2GB many times before.
I regret that it may be some time... if ever, that we see Seamonkey go
64bit. So much old code in there.
Oh really... I had no idea.
Do any plugins or addons have any problem with it?
Do you know of any other trouble that I might want to look out for?
Thanks for the tip! I will definitely try it out.
Daniel wrote:
Jesse, the SeaMonkey Council has been releasing an unsupported 64bit
Hi all
I use Seamonkey. Both mail and the browser.
My platform is Linux 32-bit.
I leave my computer running constantly and the only time Seamonkey gets
restarted is when it crashes or when it gets so slow that I just kill it
and restart.
I have a tenancy to run with maybe twenty windows,
A few more things that I forgot to mention...
I have been using Seamonkey since Netscape came in a box. I probably
should start over with a new profile. I have not needed to do that in a
long time though, so some things in there could be slowing me down and I
do not realize it.
I have
24 matches
Mail list logo
