Re: Seamonkey 2.3.1 : can I turn off Seamonkey Instant

2012-01-19 Thread Jens Hatlak
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Is there any of reverting Find's behaviour to its former line- oriented behaviour whereby it used to wait to be told what to search for (by hittingreturn) rather than trying to be über-clever and guess from the characters already typed ? about:config,

Seamonkey 2.3.1 : can I turn off Seamonkey Instant

2011-08-31 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Having finally succeeded in turning off Google Instant and Google Autocomplete by setting my home page to : http://www.google.co.uk/webhp?complete=0 I am now being driven to distraction by Seamonkey's Find behaviour (from Ctrl-F) seeking to emulate the abominable Google Instant. Is

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-31 Thread Philip Chee
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:10:42 -0700, Michael Gordon wrote: Almost all the familiar tools I used on a daily basis are missing because they are not compatible with this newer version of SeaMonkey. Most notably the “Google Search Bar” is missing, but still available with Internet Explorer.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-31 Thread Philip Chee
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:16:11 -0700, Michael Gordon wrote: Mike wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Most notably the “Google Search Bar” is missing Right-click the toolbar and choose customize. You can add a native Google Search box to the right of the address bar (ala Firefox) from there. True,

SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-30 Thread Michael Gordon
version (2.3.1). Result: SeaMonkey (2.3.1) installed without any noticeable problems. The Bookmarks, Address Book, History, and all mail accounts were available as soon as launched. Missing Tools: Almost all the familiar tools I used on a daily basis are missing because they are not compatible

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-30 Thread d...@kd4e.com
Why not use startpage.com or duckduckgo.com rather than google? Eliminate the hassle and the privacy-invasion. Missing Tools: Almost all the familiar tools I used on a daily basis are missing because they are not compatible with this newer version of SeaMonkey. Most notably the “Google Search

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-30 Thread Michael Gordon
d...@kd4e.com wrote: Why not use startpage.com or duckduckgo.com rather than google? Eliminate the hassle and the privacy-invasion. Missing Tools: Almost all the familiar tools I used on a daily basis are missing because they are not compatible with this newer version of SeaMonkey. Most

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-30 Thread Mike
Michael Gordon wrote: Most notably the “Google Search Bar” is missing Right-click the toolbar and choose customize. You can add a native Google Search box to the right of the address bar (ala Firefox) from there. -- Mike ___ support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1 Upgrade

2011-08-30 Thread Michael Gordon
Mike wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Most notably the “Google Search Bar” is missing Right-click the toolbar and choose customize. You can add a native Google Search box to the right of the address bar (ala Firefox) from there. True, but you cannot add the old search options as found in the

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Philipp van Hüllen
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Hey,hey! How does the existence and release of SM 2.3.1 square with the firm promise/policy not to issue any third level: patches, fixes, updates? Shouldn't this fix have been held for a future 2.x release? How does this play into the code changes being tested as 2.4?

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Philipp van Hüllen
NoOp schrieb: Per the Thawte instructions, I use on IE on Windows to manage my certs. Does this means that anyone running on a Mac or on Linux is left out in the cold? There is no impact on using SM, except for the process when SM checks itself for updates. Right... Does mozilla.org not

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Jens Hatlak
NoOp wrote: Actually it's the 'Changes' page that points to the bug report *not* the release notes: The Changes page is part of the Release Notes. No need to nit-pick. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread David E. Ross
On 8/26/11 6:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:36:34 -0500, David E. Ross wrote: Does this mean SeaMonkey 2.3.1 contains a new version of NSS with the new root certificate? No it doesn't. If so, please update the Wiki at https://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Release_Versions. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 8/27/2011 12:44 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:36:34 -0500, David E. Ross wrote: Does this mean SeaMonkey 2.3.1 contains a new version of NSS with the new root certificate? No it doesn't. To elaborate, it only adds the acceptance of another root for UPDATES. Before we

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread NoOp
On 08/27/2011 12:00 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/27/2011 12:44 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:36:34 -0500, David E. Ross wrote: Does this mean SeaMonkey 2.3.1 contains a new version of NSS with the new root certificate? No it doesn't. To elaborate, it only adds

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
Philipp van Hüllen schrieb: It's just about having 3 (instead of 1) root(!) certificate being allowed to sign valid certificates for servers (I assume) holding the information about updates. Right. Esp. as the one allowed root we had previously is not being used for issuing new certificates

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
NoOp schrieb: we can still send future updates even once the current certificate of our update server expires Apparently I formulated it in a way that was easy for you to misunderstand, so let me reformulate it: we can still send future updates *with a new certificate* even once the

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Are we seeing here an unheralded policy shift? Not at all. Those chemspill updates between regular six-week releases and a bump in the third part of the version number are a regular part of the rapid release plan. Firefox did something similar (for a different

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-27 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 8/26/2011 10:32 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 06:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about

SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread David E. Ross
Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. Also, it's not mentioned at the Releases MozillaWiki at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread M van Ketel
David E. Ross wrote: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. Also, it's not mentioned at the Releases MozillaWiki at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases. Yes there is, see: http://www.seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 8/26/2011 2:44 AM, David E. Ross wrote: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. Hrm, now that I'm looking I don't see my announcement here (or in any of the other groups I sent to, -- perhaps

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread Robert Kaiser
David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. The surroundings have already been pointed out by Callek et al., and http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ has it listed

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread NoOp
On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. The surroundings have already been pointed out by Callek et al., and http

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. The surroundings have already been pointed out

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread NoOp
On 08/26/2011 06:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

2011-08-26 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. The surroundings have