What a ridiculous steaming pile of garbage. The entire premise upon which this
study and it's conclusions are based is 100% backwards. Most software
companies do not publicly report security vulnerabilities until they are fixed
and that fix is released.
Also, a great many of the
On 02/27/2015 09:39 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 28/02/2015 02:18, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
On 2/03/2015 11:18 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 02/27/2015 09:39 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 28/02/2015 02:18, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
On 28/02/15 17:01, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Philip Chee wrote on 28/02/15 13:39:
On 28/02/2015 02:18, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
On 28/02/2015 02:18, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
Philip Chee wrote on 28/02/15 13:39:
On 28/02/2015 02:18, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/?tag=nl.e539s_cid=e539ttag=e539ftag=TRE17cfd61
Thank you SeaMonkey
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul Bergsagel schrieb:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/
Thank you SeaMonkey developers!!!
This just
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-
claims-security-firm/
Thank you SeaMonkey
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I find this rather improbable since SeaMonkey builds off the same
Gecko/Toolkit code as Firefox and at the most I would expect a
difference or +/- 1
Hence I would treat the other claims in that report with a bucket
On 02/26/2015 08:52 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I find this rather improbable since SeaMonkey builds off the same
Gecko/Toolkit code as Firefox and at the most I would expect a
difference or +/- 1
Hence I would
Philip Chee wrote:
On 26/02/2015 11:57, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
On 26/02/2015 04:57, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/?tag=nl.e539s_cid=e539ttag=e539ftag=TRE17cfd61
Thank you
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/?tag=nl.e539s_cid=e539ttag=e539ftag=TRE17cfd61
Thank you SeaMonkey developers!!!
On 26/02/2015 11:57, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/?tag=nl.e539s_cid=e539ttag=e539ftag=TRE17cfd61
Thank
Philip Chee wrote:
On 26/02/2015 11:57, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox
Please scroll down to the second table:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/
Thank you SeaMonkey developers!!!
I
16 matches
Mail list logo