Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 10/04/2013 01:23:
HilsB wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the damn
cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through
cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are
not. Any other ideas?
If blocking
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 10/04/2013 01:23:
HilsB wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the damn
cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through
cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are
not. Any other
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 09/04/2013 15:12:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 08/04/2013 15:43:
Ray_Net wrote:
Snip
May i sent a mail with a subject ending with a space from my pc to one
or you ?
Ray, you can e-mail me if you wish!! Remove the nospam. from my
munged address here!
Tom Pamin wrote:
Yes, exactly that.
Daniel wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
Iceman wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message
news:abwdndjuwq_fb__mnz2dnuvz_jodn...@mozilla.org:
Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10?
IE Tab V2 works with SM 2+,
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed:
dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au
What are the TBR's for, Ray??
To be removed. Remove the TBR's and you have the address to which Ray
has sent the mail. Should be correct, assuming, the nospam in your
address
Ilya wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Ilya, could I ask, Why do you want to (be able to) reply directly to a
Sender??
If the Sender has posted to this/any group, chances are they will be
back and see your reply! So why annoy them/me by replying directly to
them/me at all?
To para-phrase someone .
Daniel:
Ilya wrote:
Not that I'm eager to reply directly to senders :) I just like things
working properly.
Yeap, your logic works, so feature *should* work . but could I
suggest you not use it as a normal course, please! (for me).
And if that would be done, so it would be a perfect case
question wrote:
seamonkey Mail Font In messages are 20% too small No matter What size
font I choose in prefferences
windows font settings is also No Help
22 in lcd, window 7 pro.. newest sea monkey . all video drivers up to
date .
For me, weird font sizes in mail are most often due to
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote:
Hello together,
starting with SeaMonkey 1.16 some E-mails will not be displayed correctly anymore. That
means, the german Umlauts (Ä, Ö, Ü, a, ö, ü, ß) will be displayed not in the
right manner, I see:
geprüft und für instead of geprüft und für.
But however:
If I
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed:
dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au
What are the TBR's for, Ray??
To be removed. Remove the TBR's and you have the address to which Ray
has sent the mail. Should be correct, assuming,
Daniel:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed:
dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au
What are the TBR's for, Ray??
To be removed. Remove the TBR's and you have the address to which Ray
has sent the mail. Should be correct,
On 04/10/2013 09:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed:
dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au
What are the TBR's for, Ray??
To be removed. Remove the TBR's and you have the address to which Ray
has sent
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed:
dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au
What are the TBR's for, Ray??
To be removed. Remove the TBR's and you have the address to which Ray
has sent the mail.
WaltS wrote:
On 04/10/2013 09:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed:
dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au
What are the TBR's for, Ray??
To be removed. Remove the TBR's and you have the address to which
Daniel:
Oh, o.k., then thank you for your consideration, Ray, but I still
haven't received either e-mail!!
It is OT here, but, hm. This post will also be sent to your e-mail
address. Without the 'nospam'. Did you receive the mail?
Hartmut
___
On 10/04/2013 07:14, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Hopefully this is a bug and did not happen on purpose. The regression
range is
Last good: 2012-11-18 17:07:00 PST
First bad: 2012-11-19 15:11:00 PST
You can search for the checkin which caused the change. You can search
bugzilla or you can file a
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
HilsB wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the damn
cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through
cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are
not. Any other ideas?
If blocking new cookies doesn't
Daniel wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
Yes, exactly that.
Daniel wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
Iceman wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message
news:abwdndjuwq_fb__mnz2dnuvz_jodn...@mozilla.org:
Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10?
IE Tab V2
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies
(•) Allow cookies for the originating website only
(•) Accept for current session only
this raises a question, for me.
Is current session defined as:
from opening until closing the tab or window displaying a
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies
(•) Allow cookies for the originating website only
(•) Accept for current session only
this raises a question, for me.
Is current session defined as:
from opening until closing the tab or window
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies
(•) Allow cookies for the originating website only
(•) Accept for current session only
this raises a question, for me.
Is current session defined as:
from opening until closing
Geoff Welsh wrote, On 10/04/2013 22:15:
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies
(•) Allow cookies for the originating website only
(•) Accept for current session only
this raises a question, for me.
Is current session
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies
(•) Allow cookies for the originating website only
(•) Accept for current session only
this raises a question, for me.
Is current session defined as:
from opening until closing
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies
(•) Allow cookies for the originating website only
(•) Accept for current session only
this raises a question, for me.
Is current session defined as:
from
On 2013-04-10 2:39 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
Is current session defined as:
from opening until closing the tab or window displaying a particular web
site
-or-
from opening until quitting SeaMonkey.app as a whole
?
from opening until quitting SeaMonkey.app
--
Chris Ilias http://ilias.ca
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
Per bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581319:
What pref was ever established that throws the nag message Your copy
of Seamonkey is old and probably has known security flaws, but you
have disabled automated update checks. Please update to a newer
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
HilsB wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the damn
cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through
cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are
not. Any other ideas?
If blocking new cookies doesn't
Ed Mullen wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
HilsB wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the damn
cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through
cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are
not. Any other ideas?
If blocking new
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 2013-04-10 2:39 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
Is current session defined as:
from opening until closing the tab or window displaying a particular web
site
-or-
from opening until quitting SeaMonkey.app as a whole
?
from opening until quitting SeaMonkey.app
Well that's
Ray_Net wrote:
But, when you use SM you cannot go to the File menu and select the
last choice: Exit Ctrl+Q ?
That's an EXIT button :-)
Nope. The SeaMonkey dropdown from the Apple Main Menu bar has, as its
bottom option;
Quit SeaMonkey CMD-Q
having Q standing for exit never entered
HilsB wrote:
Here is where we are at -
Cookies default is set at 'originating only' 'no 3rd parties' and
'session only'
Tonight have selected the 'outlet-spacci.blogspot.com cookies (3)
removed both individually and as a group and set to 'block'. This has
been repeated three times. On each
Interviewed by CNN on 10/04/2013 17:15, Geoff Welsh told the world:
well, no, because I still don't know if exit your browser means CLOSE
a window, close all windows, close a tab, or QUIT the SM program. I'd
like to know what it's supposed to mean, to know if it's working
properly.
IDK
MCBastos wrote:
(OSX defaults to hibernate, not shutdown),
that Seamonkey session can in practice last several weeks, making for a
very long-lived session cookie indeed.
You have indeed uncovered the discovery that sparked my curiosity as to
the definition of Session. Chris Ilias gave
WaltS wrote:
On 04/07/2013 04:27 PM, Otto Wyss wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Erness Wild wrote:
Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss
about::config somewhere else.
Firebug is an extension that caused context menus to have many extra
34 matches
Mail list logo
