"This Connection is Untrusted" message only comes up in SeaMonkey, not on
Firefox. All of a sudden I can't use SeaMonkey anymore to browse and it is my
all time favorite browser.
The only thing that will load is the home page (yahoo.com)I have set up. I am
running the newest SeaMonkey download
Petr Voralek wrote:
Hello!
On Wednesday, 25.01.2017 18:32(+0100) *Nfn Smith* wrote, and I quote
(in part):
Any idea of what's happening?
What addons do you use? I recently had a similar problem with the
incompatible version of Mnenhy... I believe that those two threads
can still be traced
Lucas Levrel wrote on 27-01-17 22:40:
Le 27 janvier 2017, à 19:32, Mason83 a écrit :
Would you say "presque mieux" is equivalent to
"presque aussi bien/bon" ?
No. There is an intended, amusing contradiction in "presque mieux",
just as in "almost better". This somehow says "it is better but
EE wrote on 27-01-17 21:46:
Pete wrote:
Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude.
I think that what the OP is saying is that SM does a much better job of
resizing the image than IrfanView, and he wants to know how (or what
software to use) to get a better quality
EE wrote on 27-01-17 22:08:
Ray_Net wrote:
Felix Miata wrote on 25-01-17 22:49:
Ray_Net composed on 2017-01-25 22:26 (UTC+0100):
Felix Miata wrote:
Ray_Net composed on 2017-01-25 22:00 (UTC+0100):
Why your newspaper is not in plain-text ?
What's a newspaper?
Use the first link
On 27/01/2017 22:40, Lucas Levrel wrote:
> Le 27 janvier 2017, à 19:32, Mason83 a écrit :
>
>> Would you say "presque mieux" is equivalent to
>> "presque aussi bien/bon" ?
>
> No. There is an intended, amusing contradiction in "presque mieux", just
> as in "almost better". This somehow says
Hello!
On Wednesday, 25.01.2017 18:32(+0100) *Nfn Smith* wrote, and I quote
(in part):
> Any idea of what's happening?
What addons do you use? I recently had a similar problem with the
incompatible version of Mnenhy...
I believe that those two threads can still be traced on this
Le 27 janvier 2017, à 19:32, Mason83 a écrit :
Would you say "presque mieux" is equivalent to
"presque aussi bien/bon" ?
No. There is an intended, amusing contradiction in "presque mieux", just
as in "almost better". This somehow says "it is better but I dare not say
it is".
So, if "X
Ray_Net wrote:
Felix Miata wrote on 25-01-17 22:49:
Ray_Net composed on 2017-01-25 22:26 (UTC+0100):
Felix Miata wrote:
Ray_Net composed on 2017-01-25 22:00 (UTC+0100):
Why your newspaper is not in plain-text ?
What's a newspaper?
Use the first link found ->
Pete wrote:
Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude.
I think that what the OP is saying is that SM does a much better job of
resizing the image than IrfanView, and he wants to know how (or what
software to use) to get a better quality smaller image.
Peter
If it is
On 27/01/2017 17:54, Ray_Net wrote:
> Mason83 wrote on 27-01-17 16:08:
>> On 27/01/2017 15:10, Ray_Net wrote:
>>
>>> then X is nearly better than
>>
>> "nearly better" is a hard concept to grasp ;-)
>
> Sorry, my mother language is french and I use "Presque mieux" than
> Who can be translated
Mason83 wrote on 27-01-17 16:08:
On 27/01/2017 15:10, Ray_Net wrote:
then X is nearly better than
"nearly better" is a hard concept to grasp ;-)
Sorry, my mother language is french and I use "Presque mieux" than
Who can be translated as "Almost better" Did you better understand
On 27/01/2017 15:10, Ray_Net wrote:
> then X is nearly better than
"nearly better" is a hard concept to grasp ;-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Ray_Net wrote on 27-01-17 01:51:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
When I use in html width="79" border="0"/>
The rendering by SM is superb
BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this
picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture
1852x1852
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 27-01-17 04:13:
Richard Alan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels When I use in html
The rendering by SM is superb
Stands to reason...
BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this
picture on the web-page ...
On 1/26/2017 7:12 AM, Steve Dunn wrote:
On 2017-01-26 03:12, Ant wrote:
As you guys know, both Gecko based web browsers are the (lat/new)est
stable versions which I told them. "Can't they be made to also support
modern protocols?" is what they asked. So, I am asking you guys on how
to
16 matches
Mail list logo
