Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 11/30/2016 07:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

Lee wrote: On 12/2/16, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Glad that 2.47 works well but you are likely running Adrians unofficial version :) yes Official one is still stuck in l10n mud. Stuck how?

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

W dniu 12/02/2016 o 08:13 PM, Lee pisze: > >> Official one is still stuck in l10n mud. > > Stuck how? > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/ > has lots of seamonkey-2.47.XX.langpack.xpi files - do they not work, > is it just a

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/2/16, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Glad that 2.47 works well but you are likely running Adrians unofficial > version :) yes > Official one is still stuck in l10n mud. Stuck how?

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

Glad that 2.47 works well but you are likely running Adrians unofficial version :) Official one is still stuck in l10n mud. FRG Lee wrote: On 12/2/16, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > LOL! I think you meant "everything", but "anything" is probably > jupp. ewong is still

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/2/16, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > > LOL! I think you meant "everything", but "anything" is probably > > > jupp. ewong is still fighting with the 2.46 repacks so best to use > Adrians version right now until this is sorted out. A 2.47 should follow > soon but first 2.46 to

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

> LOL! I think you meant "everything", but "anything" is probably > jupp. ewong is still fighting with the 2.46 repacks so best to use Adrians version right now until this is sorted out. A 2.47 should follow soon but first 2.46 to get the build bugs out. FRG Lee wrote: On 12/1/16,

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 10:46 AM, TCW wrote: > On 12/1/2016 12:29 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 12/1/2016 10:23 AM, TCW wrote: >>> On 12/1/2016 12:12 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: > On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: >> On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 12:29 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/1/2016 10:23 AM, TCW wrote: On 12/1/2016 12:12 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 10:23 AM, TCW wrote: > On 12/1/2016 12:12 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: >>> On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: >> There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute >> malicious code on the computers

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 12:02 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 01/12/2016 12:52 PM, TCW wrote: I was *told* to not post long URLs before by Chris I and someone else. Short URLs is the preferred method is what I was told. I never said that. I told you not to refer to contributor builds as official releases.

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 12:12 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/01/2016 10:12 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: >> On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: >>> On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: > There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute > malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other

[Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: > On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: >> On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser,

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 01/12/2016 12:52 PM, TCW wrote: I was *told* to not post long URLs before by Chris I and someone else. Short URLs is the preferred method is what I was told. I never said that. I told you not to refer to contributor builds as official releases.

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 10:40 AM, Lee wrote: On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: > On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: >>> There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute >>> malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other >>> users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service >>> confirmed

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/16, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Likely 2.40 is affected. There will always be 0 day bugs and even a > fully patched Firefox will contain some. That is why I use Noscript and > an Adblocker. If a site wants that I turn off the Adblocker its a site I > will no longer visit.

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/16, Ray_Net wrote: > WaltS48 wrote on 30-11-16 15:06: >>> There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute >>> malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly >>> other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

Likely 2.40 is affected. There will always be 0 day bugs and even a fully patched Firefox will contain some. That is why I use Noscript and an Adblocker. If a site wants that I turn off the Adblocker its a site I will no longer visit. Even with Noscript there is a risk that a whitelisted site

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

WaltS48 wrote on 30-11-16 15:06: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to 50,

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 11/30/2016 7:51 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 11/30/2016 6:55 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: >> On 30/11/2016 9:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 11/30/2016 6:55 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 30/11/2016 9:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: >>> There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute >>> malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other >>> users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 11/30/16, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 30/11/2016 9:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: >>> There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute >>> malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other >>> users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

WaltS48 wrote on 11/30/2016 03:06 PM: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 30/11/2016 9:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to

0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to 50, with version 45 ESR being the