Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

Jim S wrote: Why are you/they faffing about with 1.1.anything when 2.0a2 actually works better? I don't know about you, but I don't like my suite to eat my e-mail. Basically, it's not stable. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@list

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

>NoOp wrote: >>Most WinXP apps run just fine in Win2K - but I never >>could get Silverlight to run (think the threads regarding Olympics...) >>on Win2K. >> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: >I know that this isn't what you want to hear but, . . . >"anything that runs on xp >"should" have no pro

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Jim S wrote: On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote: On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

NoOp wrote: On 02/07/2009 06:47 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98! have you checked out this?: http://x86.neostrada.pl/KernelEx/ http://www.msfn.org/board/KernelEx-v035-released-t71476.ht

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:01:17 +1100, Daniel wrote: > Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: >> --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws >> >> Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses >> six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch >> is a critical JavaScr

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On 02/07/2009 06:47 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: > >> Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98! > > have you checked out this?: > > http://x86.neostrada.pl/KernelEx/ > http://www.msfn.org/board/KernelEx-v035-released-t71476.h

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98! have you checked out this?: Didn't know about this. But now I have filed the references, and will check it out. Probably when SM2.x comes out. http://x86

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On or about 2/7/2009 9:45 PM, NoOp typed the following: > On 02/07/2009 05:05 PM, BeeNeR wrote: > >> I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies. >> >> Ed > > >

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On 02/07/2009 05:05 PM, BeeNeR wrote: > > I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies. > > Ed ___ support-seamo

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98! have you checked out this?: http://x86.neostrada.pl/KernelEx/ http://www.msfn.org/board/KernelEx-v035-released-t71476.html They claim that using this kernel will allow you to run XP programs on

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

Jim S wrote: On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote: On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses six vulnerabilities in the

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On or about 2/7/2009 8:18 PM, Jim S typed the following: > On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote: > >> On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following: >>> Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws Mozilla has released an updat

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote: > On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following: >> Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: >>> --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws >>> >>> Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses >>> six vulnerabilities in th

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following: > Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: >> --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws >> >> Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses >> six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch >> is a critical

Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine; it could be exploited

Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

--(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine; it could be exploited to crash the browser and p