Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Found the cause (or at least the main cause for SeaMonkey) today and spun off a bug from the original bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1364977 Gave a test build to someone affected and it works. I hope the bug fix is ok. If yes it will go into the final 2.48 for sure. ewong

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 7/05/2017 11:41 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 5/7/17 5:18 AM, Daniel wrote: The latest Official release in SM 2.46 and there will, shortly hopefully, be a SM 2.48 Beta release which will then become a SM 2.48 Release Version and then the SM 2.49 (Beta) will be the start of the ESR versions.

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Richmond wrote: > > https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/ > https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/ > > But there is a tinderbox build, which sounds like fun. :) > > https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux/1494033293/ > OK I was

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Richmond wrote: S Slicer wrote: Francesco wrote: Thanks. I'll keep 2.50 since i can live with this bug After all it's the only one i've found so far. Except for that, 64 bit 2.50 works really fine. Francesco Il giorno martedì 2 maggio 2017 18:56:16 UTC+2, Frank-Rainer Grahl ha scritto:

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 5/7/17 5:18 AM, Daniel wrote: The latest Official release in SM 2.46 and there will, shortly hopefully, be a SM 2.48 Beta release which will then become a SM 2.48 Release Version and then the SM 2.49 (Beta) will be the start of the ESR versions. SeaMonkey 2.48b1 was released on April 17,

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Daniel wrote: > On 7/05/2017 6:16 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> No I said. The logical step from aurora would switch to beta. Beta is >> 2.51 at the moment. 2.50 is the current release. > > It should be stressed that these are Adrian's private releases ..i.e. > Adrian has a SM 2.50 release

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 7/05/2017 6:16 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: No I said. The logical step from aurora would switch to beta. Beta is 2.51 at the moment. 2.50 is the current release. It should be stressed that these are Adrian's private releases ..i.e. Adrian has a SM 2.50 release version and a SM 2.51 Beta

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

No I said. The logical step from aurora would switch to beta. Beta is 2.51 at the moment. 2.50 is the current release. If you compile yourself clone comm-esr52 and apply the patch for bug 1353765: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353765 This gives you 2.49.1 which has all security

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

> 2.49 and 2.50 profiles should be interchangeable Same for 2.51 FRG Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: No I said. The logical step from aurora would switch to beta. Beta is 2.51 at the moment. 2.50 is the current release. If you compile yourself clone comm-esr52 and apply the patch for bug 1353765:

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Excuse me for still being confused. :) I know you said to move to Adrian's beta, but where does he get the source? I checked out comm-beta and compiled it, and it says 2.51. But I see also there is a 2.48b1. https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.48b1/ So what have I ended up

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

S Slicer wrote: > Francesco wrote: >> Thanks. >> I'll keep 2.50 since i can live with this bug After all it's the only >> one i've found so far. Except for that, 64 bit 2.50 works really fine. >> >> Francesco >> >> >> Il giorno martedì 2 maggio 2017 18:56:16 UTC+2, Frank-Rainer Grahl ha >>

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Francesco wrote: Thanks. I'll keep 2.50 since i can live with this bug After all it's the only one i've found so far. Except for that, 64 bit 2.50 works really fine. Francesco Il giorno martedì 2 maggio 2017 18:56:16 UTC+2, Frank-Rainer Grahl ha scritto: Looks like the x64 problem is a

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Thanks. I'll keep 2.50 since i can live with this bug After all it's the only one i've found so far. Except for that, 64 bit 2.50 works really fine. Francesco Il giorno martedì 2 maggio 2017 18:56:16 UTC+2, Frank-Rainer Grahl ha scritto: > Looks like the x64 problem is a bit older :) > >

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Looks like the x64 problem is a bit older :) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393302 I wouldn't expect a solution soon. FRG Francesco wrote: I can't find a 32 bit 2.50 release on akalla site, but maybe i'm missing something. Thanks Francesco Il giorno martedì 2 maggio 2017

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Yes you are right. I would advise to stay with 2.49 and see if this one works. I think he is preparing 2.49.1 from the ESR branch right now. FRG Francesco wrote: I can't find a 32 bit 2.50 release on akalla site, but maybe i'm missing something. Thanks Francesco Il giorno martedì 2 maggio

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

I can't find a 32 bit 2.50 release on akalla site, but maybe i'm missing something. Thanks Francesco Il giorno martedì 2 maggio 2017 14:30:20 UTC+2, Frank-Rainer Grahl ha scritto: > Interesting. Seems to be a problem with the x64 version only. First problem I > ever encountered with the x64.

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Interesting. Seems to be a problem with the x64 version only. First problem I ever encountered with the x64. Please uninstall and try the x86 version. I will need to look at the installer and see if something is wrong there. FRG Francesco wrote: Il giorno sabato 29 aprile 2017 11:57:27 UTC+2,

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Looks like a new bug. Its an easy way to crash 2.52a1 on Windows 7. It just closes. FRG Francesco wrote: Il giorno sabato 29 aprile 2017 11:57:27 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: On 29/04/2017 4:55 PM, Francesco wrote: Il giorno venerdì 28 aprile 2017 16:40:40 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: On

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 2/05/2017 5:03 PM, Francesco wrote: Il giorno sabato 29 aprile 2017 11:57:27 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: On 29/04/2017 4:55 PM, Francesco wrote: Il giorno venerdì 28 aprile 2017 16:40:40 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: On 28/04/2017 11:20 PM, Francesco wrote: Il giorno lunedì 24 aprile 2017

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Il giorno sabato 29 aprile 2017 11:57:27 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: > On 29/04/2017 4:55 PM, Francesco wrote: > > Il giorno venerdì 28 aprile 2017 16:40:40 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: > >> On 28/04/2017 11:20 PM, Francesco wrote: > >>> Il giorno lunedì 24 aprile 2017 15:05:33 UTC+2, TCW ha scritto: >

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 1/05/2017 10:00 PM, TCW wrote: On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:32:39 +1000, Daniel wrote: On 28/04/2017 8:25 PM, TCW wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:45:05 +1000, Daniel wrote: On 28/04/2017 4:21 AM, TCW wrote: On 4/24/17 8:05 AM, TCW wrote:

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 29/04/2017 4:55 PM, Francesco wrote: Il giorno venerdì 28 aprile 2017 16:40:40 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: On 28/04/2017 11:20 PM, Francesco wrote: Il giorno lunedì 24 aprile 2017 15:05:33 UTC+2, TCW ha scritto: Just saw it here

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Il giorno venerdì 28 aprile 2017 16:40:40 UTC+2, Daniel ha scritto: > On 28/04/2017 11:20 PM, Francesco wrote: > > Il giorno lunedì 24 aprile 2017 15:05:33 UTC+2, TCW ha scritto: > >> Just saw it here > >>

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 28/04/2017 11:20 PM, surferjoe...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno lunedì 24 aprile 2017 15:05:33 UTC+2, TCW ha scritto: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Hello, i installed this release and noticed that the

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 28/04/2017 8:25 PM, TCW wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:45:05 +1000, Daniel wrote: On 28/04/2017 4:21 AM, TCW wrote: On 4/24/17 8:05 AM, TCW wrote: Just saw it here

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Il giorno lunedì 24 aprile 2017 15:05:33 UTC+2, TCW ha scritto: > Just saw it here > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Hello, i installed this release and noticed that the right click "send to mail recipient" command doesn't

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > It is the same in Thunderbird. Mozilla changed locale apis. Might not be > fixed > completely for some time or ever. Tracked in Bug 1344594 and follow ups. > > Carl Kaufmann wrote: >> TCW wrote: >>> Just saw it here >>>

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

No, only the aurora a2 channel has been discontinued by Mozilla. Looking at recent code quality and other issues a mistake imho but telling the world how stable the current release process became made a good press release and that is all what seems to count :) The logical step is to switch to

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 28/04/2017 4:21 AM, TCW wrote: On 4/24/17 8:05 AM, TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Well, after quiet a bit of regular browser use, I am up to 1.2GB of RAM use on SM 2.51b with one window

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 28/04/2017 5:30 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The next releases after 2.48 will be from the ESR branch (2.49.x) for some time. They will contain only bug and security fixes. The next planned release after 2.49.x is 2.56 ESR. Depending on the fallout after Firefox 57 it might never come to

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Thank you, Thomas Press CTRL-ALT-DEL (if you're using Windows) and click Task Manager. Might also have to click on "Show Processes From All Users" to see it. -- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

The next releases after 2.48 will be from the ESR branch (2.49.x) for some time. They will contain only bug and security fixes. The next planned release after 2.49.x is 2.56 ESR. Depending on the fallout after Firefox 57 it might never come to this but we will see. The a2 aurora versions have

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

It is the same in Thunderbird. Mozilla changed locale apis. Might not be fixed completely for some time or ever. Tracked in Bug 1344594 and follow ups. Carl Kaufmann wrote: TCW wrote: Just saw it here

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

No. The devtools need a long look over and nobody found the time. Sorry :( FRG TCW wrote: On 4/24/17 1:41 PM, EE wrote: TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Do the language packs work, and is

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/24/17 8:05 AM, TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Well, after quiet a bit of regular browser use, I am up to 1.2GB of RAM use on SM 2.51b with one window open. While I would say that's a

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

TCW wrote: On 4/27/17 12:55 PM, Pat Connors wrote: TCW wrote: Task manager will show current memory consumption. I cannot find the 'task manager', I checked all the categories and do not see it. Press CTRL-ALT-DEL (if you're using Windows) and click Task Manager. Might also have to click

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/27/17 12:55 PM, Pat Connors wrote: TCW wrote: Task manager will show current memory consumption. I cannot find the 'task manager', I checked all the categories and do not see it. Press CTRL-ALT-DEL (if you're using Windows) and click Task Manager. Might also have to click on "Show

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

TCW wrote: Task manager will show current memory consumption. I cannot find the 'task manager', I checked all the categories and do not see it. -- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/27/17 4:34 AM, Richmond wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: TCW wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:32:05 -0700, Pat Connors wrote: Leaky as in memory leakage. 2.48 and 2.49 were leaky for me. During the course of the day memory usage would just go up and up and never be

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > TCW wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:32:05 -0700, Pat Connors >> wrote: >> Leaky as in memory leakage. 2.48 and 2.49 were leaky for me. During the course of the day memory usage would just go up and up and never be freed up until

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

TCW wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:32:05 -0700, Pat Connors wrote: Leaky as in memory leakage. 2.48 and 2.49 were leaky for me. During the course of the day memory usage would just go up and up and never be freed up until I was consuming 1-2GB RAM. 2.50beta was fine the

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Leaky as in memory leakage. 2.48 and 2.49 were leaky for me. During the course of the day memory usage would just go up and up and never be freed up until I was consuming 1-2GB RAM. 2.50beta was fine the 2.50 release brought back the leakiness. I just switched to the 2.51 beta this morning

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/26/17 1:32 PM, Pat Connors wrote: I have found this final version of Adrian's 2.50 leaky as the previous versions were. The 2.50 beta from March seemed better. I was able to crash 2.50 after it had consumed 1+GB of RAM and then measuring memory but even with 2.50 beta, I was always

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

I have found this final version of Adrian's 2.50 leaky as the previous versions were. The 2.50 beta from March seemed better. I was able to crash 2.50 after it had consumed 1+GB of RAM and then measuring memory but even with 2.50 beta, I was always stable. What does 'leaky' mean? I have

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/24/17 4:24 PM, S Slicer wrote: TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ The last 64- bit version that worked for me was 2.45! I even uninstalled all add-ons, and v2.50, like the others after

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/25/17 8:04 AM, Richmond wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl writes: Depending on the fallout after Firefox 57 this might be a dead end so please back up you 2.49 profile. The next official version after 2.48 will be 2.49.1 from the ESR channel. 2.50 still has a notification bug

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Frank-Rainer Grahl writes: > Depending on the fallout after Firefox 57 this might be a dead end so please > back up you 2.49 profile. The next official version after 2.48 will be 2.49.1 > from the ESR channel. > > 2.50 still has a notification bug which isn't bad but noticeable: >

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ It changed the date format in mail/news on my system (Windows 10, x64), from ISO8601 (-MM-DD) to US standard (MM/DD/YY), and I see no way to change it to

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ The last 64- bit version that worked for me was 2.45! I even uninstalled all add-ons, and v2.50, like the others after v2.45, crashed every time I tried to

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/24/17 1:41 PM, EE wrote: TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Do the language packs work, and is the problem with the devtools eyedropper fixed yet? Only one way to find out. ;-)

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ Do the language packs work, and is the problem with the devtools eyedropper fixed yet? ___ support-seamonkey mailing

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

2.50 will not work on Vista/Server 2008 or XP/Server 2003/XP64. FRG TCW wrote: On 4/24/17 8:27 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/24/17 9:05 AM, TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ He isn't going to

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/24/17 8:27 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/24/17 9:05 AM, TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ He isn't going to follow the ESR channel so WindowsXP and Vista users can use his builds? Hard to

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Depending on the fallout after Firefox 57 this might be a dead end so please back up you 2.49 profile. The next official version after 2.48 will be 2.49.1 from the ESR channel. 2.50 still has a notification bug which isn't bad but noticeable:

Re: There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

On 4/24/17 9:05 AM, TCW wrote: Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ He isn't going to follow the ESR channel so WindowsXP and Vista users can use his builds? -- Go Bucs and Pens! Coexist

There's a new stable akalla 2.50 x64 build

Just saw it here https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey