some email addresses puts mail in News Folder's Inbox

2009-05-31 Thread Nairda
this behaviour. Any tips will be greatly appreciated. TIA. -Nairda ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: some email addresses puts mail in News Folder's Inbox

2009-06-04 Thread Nairda
Nairda wrote: Hi everyone. I have a slight problem with where some of my email addresses downloads their mail to. I have composed filters to work around this problem and changed folder options for them, but it's still a bit perplexing to me as to why it happens in the first place, and h

Re: some email addresses download mail to News Folder's Inbox

2009-06-05 Thread Nairda
Nairda wrote: Nairda wrote: Hi everyone. I have a slight problem with where some of my email addresses downloads their mail to. I have composed filters to work around this problem and changed folder options for them, but it's still a bit perplexing to me as to why it happens in the

Re: some email addresses download mail to News Folder's Inbox

2009-06-07 Thread Nairda
Hartmut Figge wrote: Nairda: Nairda wrote: Really? No one knows anything about this bug? Well, what bug? *g* |I have a slight problem with where some of my email addresses |downloads their mail to. |some email addresses download mail to News Folder's Inbox I have to guess what

Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

2009-06-20 Thread Nairda
Hi everyone. Can someone with a bit more understanding of these things please read this article and say weather this applies to SM as well? http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1716&tag=nl.e011 Snip: In a surprise move this year, Microsoft has decided to quietly install what amounts

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

2009-06-20 Thread Nairda
Nairda wrote: Hi everyone. Can someone with a bit more understanding of these things please read this article and say weather this applies to SM as well? http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1716&tag=nl.e011 Snip: In a surprise move this year, Microsoft has decided to qui

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

2009-06-20 Thread Nairda
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/20/2009 6:02 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 6/20/2009 5:00 PM, Nairda wrote: Hi everyone. Can someone with a bit more understanding of these things please read this article and say weather this applies to SM as well? http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1716

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

2009-06-21 Thread Nairda
Benoit Renard wrote: David E. Ross wrote: The malware is a Firefox extension that (among other things) disables the ability of Firefox to remove it. As far as I know, they didn't disable uninstallation. It just isn't possible while using Firefox because it's installed on the application leve

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability

2009-06-22 Thread Nairda
»Q« wrote: In <news:brsdnaea4pknukpxnz2dnuvz_vqdn...@mozilla.org>, Nairda wrote: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1716&tag=nl.e011 Snip: "We added this support at the machine level in order to enable the feature for all users on the machine. Seems reasonable righ

Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-21 Thread Nairda
Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.moz

Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-21 Thread Nairda
Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it will ever be avai

Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-21 Thread Nairda
Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it

Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-21 Thread Nairda
Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be

Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-22 Thread Nairda
Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Nairda wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If

Re: SMTP parameter in SM2 after having migrated from SM1

2009-11-24 Thread Nairda
obones wrote: Hello all, I'm currently reviewing SM2 and when I installed it I told it to import the settings from my existing SM1 installation. All email accounts got imported, along with the SMTP server definition. While I can send emails just fine in SM1, I always get an error when sending

Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-24 Thread Nairda
David Wilkinson wrote: Nairda wrote: Yes, they can, and extra profiles and dictionaries can be restored. Given the time and inclination. But some really serious security hole(s) are going to have to be found in SM1.1.18 first. (: For me it is the browser compatibility that will get me to

Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.

2009-11-25 Thread Nairda
Martin Freitag wrote: Nairda schrieb: If I just installed the SM2 browser component, could I continue using the rest of my SM1.18 apps, Without losing access to my old 1.18 profiles? Or is this a really bad idea? (: You can install SM2 safely to a folder like Seamonkey2 besides your old SM1.1

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

2010-01-30 Thread Nairda
Mike C wrote: I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm). I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for the time being. Reasons?? I'm sticking with v1.1.18 for now at least. Because of the add ons, mainly MultiZilla, which (btw Lee) gives y

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

2010-02-02 Thread Nairda
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 1/2/2010 00:00, Phillip Jones told the world: Most Banks don't accept any and browser that has a version number of Version 1.x on anything. My bank Suntrust said the didn't accept a version one of any browser. I change the the user agent to add /not Fi

Re: 1.1.18 or 2.x ?? (curious)

2010-02-06 Thread Nairda
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 2/2/2010 12:30, Phillip Jones told the world: I really hope HJ gets inspired enough to do the migration. He is the _true father of tabbed browsing_ . So we all owe him a debt of gratitude. So, 1.1.18 it is then. :-/ ahh so that's the rascal that's respo

Firefox is breaking my heart...sort of

2010-07-21 Thread Nairda
Just a rave I thought some people here may be interested in. Linux and Open Source http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1689&tag=nl.e011 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinf

Re: Updated to 2.0.14

2011-05-01 Thread Nairda
wingspan2 wrote: Hello everyone, Well I logged onto my Sea Monkey browser as usual and when my browser appeared, it had automatically updated to Sea Monkey 2.0.14. It looked a bit different but everything appeared to be there. But.. when I went to use my e-mail that Sea Monkey provides, I w