Re: Email is very slow

2009-03-23 Thread Barclay, Daniel
Chuck Mryglot wrote: > Hi, > I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. > Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but just > going from message to message is about a 4 sec duration...regardless of > the size of the mail. I don't remember if this all started with > 1.1.13

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-19 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Ray_Net wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Is it an option somewhere to compact all folders automatically ? see what NoOp said. But I would make a caution. Don't set it too low of a number, otherwise, it might cause problems when downloading email. 100 Kb is t

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-19 Thread Chuck Mryglot
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Chuck Mryglot wrote: Hi, I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but just going from message to message is about a 4 sec duration...regardless of the size of the mail. I don't remember if thi

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-19 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Is it an option somewhere to compact all folders automatically ? see what NoOp said. But I would make a caution. Don't set it too low of a number, otherwise, it might cause problems when downloading email. 100 Kb is the d

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-19 Thread Ray_Net
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Is it an option somewhere to compact all folders automatically ? see what NoOp said. But I would make a caution. Don't set it too low of a number, otherwise, it might cause problems when downloading email. 100 Kb is the default

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread NoOp
On 12/18/2008 04:24 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > Ray_Net wrote: > >> Is it an option somewhere to compact all folders automatically ? > > see what NoOp said. But I would make a caution. Don't > set it too low of a number, otherwise, it might cause > problems when downloading em

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Ray_Net wrote: Is it an option somewhere to compact all folders automatically ? see what NoOp said. But I would make a caution. Don't set it too low of a number, otherwise, it might cause problems when downloading email. -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help E

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread NoOp
On 12/18/2008 03:17 PM, Ray_Net wrote: > Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: >> Chuck Mryglot wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. >>> Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but >>> just going from message to message is about a 4 sec >>> duration...r

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread Ray_Net
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Chuck Mryglot wrote: Hi, I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but just going from message to message is about a 4 sec duration...regardless of the size of the mail. I don't remember if thi

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Chuck Mryglot wrote: Hi, I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but just going from message to message is about a 4 sec duration...regardless of the size of the mail. I don't remember if this all started with 1.1.13but probab

Re: Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread keith_w
Chuck Mryglot wrote: Hi, I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but just going from message to message is about a 4 sec duration...regardless of the size of the mail. I don't remember if this all started with 1.1.13but probab

Email is very slow

2008-12-18 Thread Chuck Mryglot
Hi, I'm on 1.1.13 and running POP email. Lately I've noticed that it is very slow.It downloads fine, but just going from message to message is about a 4 sec duration...regardless of the size of the mail. I don't remember if this all started with 1.1.13but probably. Help anyone?