BeeNeR wrote:
On or about 2/16/2009 9:17 PM, Roger Fink typed the following:
This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
http://www.marketwatch.com/
Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in SeaMonkey 1.1.9
at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Roger Fink:
>> Rick wrote:
>>> Roger Fink wrote:
>
This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
http://www.marketwatch.com/
Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in
SeaMonkey 1.1.9 at any font size, at least on my
Roger Fink:
>Rick wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
>>> http://www.marketwatch.com/
>>> Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in
>>> SeaMonkey 1.1.9 at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
>>
>> I'll let you
Rick wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
>> http://www.marketwatch.com/
>> Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in
>> SeaMonkey 1.1.9 at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
>>
>>
> I'll let you know when SM 2 i
Roger Fink wrote:
This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
http://www.marketwatch.com/
Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in SeaMonkey 1.1.9
at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
I'll let you know when SM 2 is released and I have it.
--
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
> This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
> http://www.marketwatch.com/
> Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
http://www.marketwatch.com/
Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in
SeaMonkey 1.1.9 at any font size, at least on m
On or about 2/16/2009 9:17 PM, Roger Fink typed the following:
> This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
> http://www.marketwatch.com/
> Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in SeaMonkey 1.1.9
> at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
>
>
Loo
Roger Fink wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
>>> http://www.marketwatch.com/
>>> Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in
>>> SeaMonkey 1.1.9 at any font size, at least on m
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
>> http://www.marketwatch.com/
>> Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in
>> SeaMonkey 1.1.9 at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
>
> sorry
Roger Fink wrote:
This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
http://www.marketwatch.com/
Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in SeaMonkey 1.1.9
at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
sorry, I don't have SM2, but it looks the same in FF3
as i
This page, viewed daily by zillions, looks great in Firefox 3.06.
http://www.marketwatch.com/
Curious to know how it looks in SeaMonkey 2 (it is a mess in SeaMonkey 1.1.9
at any font size, at least on my Win2k setup).
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo