[freenet-support] Odd failure(?) mode, and updating.

2004-01-16 Thread Paul Derbyshire
You may remember me as the one who had problems with fproxy that proved to be brain-dead IE defaults. Turns out fproxy and my node are working fine, and the node gets around 1 request a second suggesting it's integrating way better than the freesite of evil keeps bitching about. :)

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5055 crashes under Linux

2004-01-16 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:43:42 +0100 Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have checked to code. The file property that is used is 'last modified time'. Can you verify that your touch modified this property on the fields. I have now committed code to unstable which gives a more informative

Re: [freenet-support] Odd failure(?) mode, and updating.

2004-01-16 Thread Niklas Bergh
- Original Message - From: Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:30 AM Subject: [freenet-support] Odd failure(?) mode, and updating. You may remember me as the one who had problems with fproxy that proved to be brain-dead IE

[freenet-support] 5061 Observations questions

2004-01-16 Thread Kevin Steen
Some observations from my 5061 node, ocmContents page (and the resulting questions to enhance my understanding of what's going on.) : Established node, restarted and run for 2 hrs: Total amount of messages transfered Type Sent/Received DataNotFound 28/58 InsertReply

[freenet-support] 5061: Unrecognized trailer ID

2004-01-16 Thread Kevin Steen
Does a node send any kind of error when it receives Unrecognized trailers? I'm seeing many of these messages (see below), even after the node has been running an hour. If we don't reset, does that mean some node upstream is sending data which will never be used? (I'm on a mission to identify

[freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Someone
Hi, at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading other messages here I got the impression that the actual stable build should do way better than

Re: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Herve Lefebvre
Hi, at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, What kind of errors ? high CPU and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading other messages here I got the impression that the actual stable

[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Someone
Herve Lefebvre schrieb: What kind of errors ? I already reported them here and mailed some log files to toad. or maybe a configuration problem. It is mainly on default configuration, I just had to reduce the max connections to 80 because of my cheap SOHO router. And with the builds previous to

RE: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Niklas Bergh
I'm running with the IBM JVM 1.4.1 wich has (at least under linux) dramatically better performances than the SUN JVM. And is not available for windows yet :( I am running 1.4.2_03 and cannot say I am seeing any problems that are caused by the actual JVM version... /N

RE: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Niklas Bergh
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Someone Sent: den 16 januari 2004 13:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k Herve Lefebvre schrieb: What kind of errors ? I already

[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Someone
Niklas Bergh schrieb: Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. Seems to be only 1.3.1 http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/wsdk/ /N Greets someone

RE: [freenet-support] 5061 Observations questions

2004-01-16 Thread Niklas Bergh
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Steen Sent: den 16 januari 2004 12:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] 5061 Observations questions Some observations from my 5061 node, ocmContents page (and the

[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Someone
Herve Lefebvre schrieb: Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. Well maybe there will be one in the future. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some others

[freenet-support] Marked specialisation with 6441

2004-01-16 Thread Roger Hayter
Has anyone noticed considerable specialisation appearing with the current unstable builds (last 3/4 days)? I am getting 3:1 peaks in inbound request search keys and successful inbound request search keys for the same key space, as well as a distinct correlated peak in datastore keys. So far

[freenet-support] Specialisation with stable was Re: Marked specialisation with 6441

2004-01-16 Thread Someone
In stable I can't see any specialisation. My node is running since 04/2003 with a DS size of 4GB (no DS wipe) and this is the current Histogram of keys in the DS: Histogram of keys in in fred's data store These are the keys to the data in your node's local cache (DataStore) 16.01.2004 22:53:38

Re: [freenet-support] Specialisation with stable was Re: Marked specialisation with 6441

2004-01-16 Thread Kevin Steen
I think anyone who regularly browses Freenet is going to destroy their node's specialisation. Not really a big problem since it means popular content is available from more places in the network. Also, recent changes (in 5061) to send requests to all the nodes we know about, means the data you've

[freenet-support] DFI being inserted late today -- sorry!

2004-01-16 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
I upgraded my Sun JDK today via FreeBSD's ports collection. Building the entire beast from source. Took longer than expected. I probably should have just killed everything else instead of letting fred and other stuff run as usual the whole time. Anyway, it's finally done, fred was just