Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When inserting files via

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread VolodyA! V Anarhist
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread VolodyA! V Anarhist
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:54:42 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or