Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on Wrap - Issues
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, For some time now I have been running monowall on a Wrap board on CF without issues, however I came across some rather lovely features of pfSense I would love to have, mainly: * Support for my Wireless mini-pci card - Wiston * Rule Schedules * RDD Graphs and more However, after installing pfSense (1.2 STABLE) and getting it all setup with my /29 range etc, I ran into a couple of small snags. 1. I have a Server called 'Max' - when adding this to the aliases (as I have prev done under mono) I would get an error on the reload of the config :( It would appear I am unable to add this host name as an alias. I presume max is a reserved word ? However the only workaround I can do is not to have an alias for this host and enter the ip address for now - which I can live with (Just wanted to point out in case this was a bug or error). There are certain keywords that can't be used in an alias, looks like our input validation missed one. Ticket opened, thanks for the report. 2. Outbound NAT - As I have 3 mail servers here, I wanted each server to go out on its own IP address rather than the default interface address, simple enough (and currently have working under mono) - however as much as I try all IP's are presented as my firewall IP :( I have the relevant entries in Virtual IPs (Proxy ARP) and set the required rules for Outbound NAT - but they seem to get ignored, however as I said I do have this working fine at the mo under mono so I think its correct how I have it setup :( It's the same to configure as in m0n0, and it works fine. How do you have it setup? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on Wrap - Issues
Hi Chirs, 1. I have a Server called 'Max' - when adding this to the aliases (as I have prev done under mono) I would get an error on the reload of the config :( It would appear I am unable to add this host name as an alias. I presume max is a reserved word ? However the only workaround I can do is not to have an alias for this host and enter the ip address for now - which I can live with (Just wanted to point out in case this was a bug or error). There are certain keywords that can't be used in an alias, looks like our input validation missed one. Ticket opened, thanks for the report. No worries, glad it helped :) I have the relevant entries in Virtual IPs (Proxy ARP) and set the required rules for Outbound NAT - but they seem to get ignored, however as I said I do have this working fine at the mo under mono so I think its correct how I have it setup :( It's the same to configure as in m0n0, and it works fine. How do you have it setup? Ok... well under m0n0 I have the following: .190 is the firewall WAN IP Under Proxy ARP I have .186 .187 .188 .189 So I created these under the Virtual IP section in the interface - and selected ARP as the option ?. (Working from memory here, please bear with me) In m0no: Under NAT - OUTBOUND NAT I have the following entries. INTERFACE - SOURCE - DESTINATION - TARGET - DESC WAN - 192.168.102.3/32 - * - x.x.x.186 - Orion - .186 WAN - 192.168.102.10/32 - * - x.x.x.187 - Pegasus - .187 WAN - 192.168.102.2/32 - * - x.x.x.188 - Max - .188 WAN - 192.168.102.14/32 - * - x.x.x.189 - Lyra - .189 So if I SSH into any of these boxes and launch $ lynx http://www.whatismyip.com - each box reports the correct WAN IP I require... so appears to be fine. However under pfSense - all the boxes report (using the same method above) .190 - which is the firewall WAN IP Enable advanced outbound NAT - Ticked Thanks for you help with this... Regards Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on Wrap - Issues
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip In m0no: Under NAT - OUTBOUND NAT I have the following entries. INTERFACE - SOURCE - DESTINATION - TARGET - DESC WAN - 192.168.102.3/32 - * - x.x.x.186 - Orion - .186 WAN - 192.168.102.10/32 - * - x.x.x.187 - Pegasus - .187 WAN - 192.168.102.2/32 - * - x.x.x.188 - Max - .188 WAN - 192.168.102.14/32 - * - x.x.x.189 - Lyra - .189 So if I SSH into any of these boxes and launch $ lynx http://www.whatismyip.com - each box reports the correct WAN IP I require... so appears to be fine. However under pfSense - all the boxes report (using the same method above) .190 - which is the firewall WAN IP Enable advanced outbound NAT - Ticked Config looks fine. Do you have any packages installed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on Wrap - Issues
In m0no: Under NAT - OUTBOUND NAT I have the following entries. INTERFACE - SOURCE - DESTINATION - TARGET - DESC WAN - 192.168.102.3/32 - * - x.x.x.186 - Orion - .186 WAN - 192.168.102.10/32 - * - x.x.x.187 - Pegasus - .187 WAN - 192.168.102.2/32 - * - x.x.x.188 - Max - .188 WAN - 192.168.102.14/32 - * - x.x.x.189 - Lyra - .189 So if I SSH into any of these boxes and launch $ lynx http://www.whatismyip.com - each box reports the correct WAN IP I require... so appears to be fine. However under pfSense - all the boxes report (using the same method above) .190 - which is the firewall WAN IP Enable advanced outbound NAT - Ticked Config looks fine. Do you have any packages installed? Nope, just using the Embedded version onto a CF (1GB). Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense on WRAP
Timo Boettcher wrote: * nix4me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a WRAP board (266mhz 128mb ram). I've read where pfsense takes up more resources than the 1.22 version of m0n0wall but I don't see any talk of how much more. Will pfsense run ok on my WRAP for my home 10mbit/1mbit cable connection? Works for me here (same wrap, 10Mbit/1MBit DSL-line). Didn't do any load test other than throughput, though. Especially, I didn't test high packetrate apps (p2p-filesharing) or crypto-stuff (vpn). Timo Well it seems to be holding its own. At idle, it reports ~5% CPU and ~40% memory usage. With a full 10mbit download, it was up to ~50% / 50%. So it seems to be working within its limits. Im running ftp server but no p2p. The configuration webpage speed is a tad sluggish, but I can live with that as long as it routes without slowdown. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense on WRAP
Minimum requirements are located here: http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=43 That configuration should be fine for 10 megabit. Scott On 1/3/07, nix4me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a WRAP board (266mhz 128mb ram). I've read where pfsense takes up more resources than the 1.22 version of m0n0wall but I don't see any talk of how much more. Will pfsense run ok on my WRAP for my home 10mbit/1mbit cable connection? I don't necessarily need the traffic shaper running but it would be a plus if it works better than m0n0wall. I can run a shaper on the Linux server if need be, seems to work better that way. Thanks for any thoughts, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on WRAP
Sebastian == Sebastian Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sebastian I've succesfully isntalled pfsense on a wrap, you only Sebastian have to take out the cf and flash the image via an Sebastian adapter installerd on your computer Thanks. I thought, due to the existence of a tutorial, that it could be more complicated. -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on WRAP
I've succesfully isntalled pfsense on a wrap, you only have to take out the cf and flash the image via an adapter installerd on your computerOn 10/14/05, Walter C. Pelissero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Scott Ullrich writes: No, not at this time.What's wrong with the flash tutorial? Nothing beside the fact that I'd have to go through the lengthyprocess of installing some Linux compatibility package on my FreeBSDto be able to run the bloated Macromedia Flash player (no, the GPLedone doesn't play the tutorial).Anyhow, a player I'd have no use for, beside watching some silly animation the most uninteresting web pagesseem to be littered with.But I suppose that's just my problem.--walter pelisserohttp://www.pelissero.de -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- Sébastien Rodriguez
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on WRAP
Scott Ullrich writes: No, not at this time. What's wrong with the flash tutorial? Nothing beside the fact that I'd have to go through the lengthy process of installing some Linux compatibility package on my FreeBSD to be able to run the bloated Macromedia Flash player (no, the GPLed one doesn't play the tutorial). Anyhow, a player I'd have no use for, beside watching some silly animation the most uninteresting web pages seem to be littered with. But I suppose that's just my problem. -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on WRAP
No, not at this time. What's wrong with the flash tutorial? On 10/13/05, Walter C. Pelissero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any non-flash tutorial that explains how to install pfSense on a PCEngines WRAP? Thanks, -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
