On 10/15/2015 01:37 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 10/15/2015 10:07 PM, Steven Boardman wrote:
Subs are a must. The more you have, the more even the response around the
room?
Yes, and the better your LF localisation. Ideally, we'd want to do a
separate decode for the subs, not just simple
Bah... (; hello Charlie hope you're well ! I just realised the x32 has 32
ins but only 22 outs you can expand it but probably end up paying more than
madi or adats...
On Thursday, 22 October 2015, Charlie Richmond
wrote:
> Doorstop you say?? ;-)
>
> On 21 October 2015 at
We have one with the stage box for a total of 32 outs. ~$3k We took it
apart to check out the analog stage- even replaced a few components. It's a
really good value. The whole thing is OSC controllable too.
Ben
On Thursday, October 22, 2015, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
netti...@stackingdwarves.net>
On 10/22/2015 08:27 AM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Bah... (; hello Charlie hope you're well ! I just realised the x32 has 32
ins but only 22 outs you can expand it but probably end up paying more than
madi or adats...
FWIW, there even is a MADI I/O card for the X32/M32. The IEM Graz has
one, I
Doorstop you say?? ;-)
On 21 October 2015 at 17:30, Augustine Leudar
wrote:
> Daw ☺damn you autocorrect.
>
> On Thursday, 22 October 2015, Augustine Leudar
> wrote:
>
> > You should also look at the Behringer x32 - 32 channels, midas
Daw ☺damn you autocorrect.
On Thursday, 22 October 2015, Augustine Leudar
wrote:
> You should also look at the Behringer x32 - 32 channels, midas preamps,
> motorised faders, proven reliability, works as a usb multichannel
> soundcard and door controller. 1000
You should also look at the Behringer x32 - 32 channels, midas preamps,
motorised faders, proven reliability, works as a usb multichannel
soundcard and door controller. 1000 pounds.
On Tuesday, 20 October 2015, Michael Chapman wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen wrote (Thu, October
Fons Adriaensen wrote (Thu, October 15, 2015 6:47 pm) :
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
>> We've seen all those outlandish claims of magical waveguides that
>> are just fractions of the wavelength in diameter and yet shape the
>> sound so wonderfully that a
> Charles Veasey wrote:
>> Martin -
>>
>> To clarify the use of the subs within a tetrahedral array, it would
>> require
>> the subs to be elevated off the floor?
>
> At least one, as described by Michael.
>
I should apologise for the brevity of my respone.
The problem (for me at least) is that
Charles Veasey wrote:
> Martin -
>
> To clarify the use of the subs within a tetrahedral array, it would require
> the subs to be elevated off the floor?
At least one, as described by Michael.
> Given the weight of most subs, this
> seems a bit difficult in practice. Thoughts?
Then try three
There is very good availability of speakers that are low Cost and designed
for 80Hz and upp... They usually come in 5 pack and include one sub woofer ☺
The are usually not powered except for The subwoofer.
I use Kef eggs...
The decoding of low frequency signals is not really relevant for small
> Martin -
>
> To clarify the use of the subs within a tetrahedral array, it would
> require
> the subs to be elevated off the floor? Given the weight of most subs, this
> seems a bit difficult in practice. Thoughts?
>
At the worst/best ... only one needs lifting.
So just a bit of fishing* line
Martin -
To clarify the use of the subs within a tetrahedral array, it would require
the subs to be elevated off the floor? Given the weight of most subs, this
seems a bit difficult in practice. Thoughts?
thanks,
Charles
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Martin Leese <
On 10/16/2015 08:34 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Next Ambdec (already in use here, and to be released soon)
can do this.
<..>
1. Bandsplitting, four options:
- single band
- single band with sub xover
- dual band
- dual band with sub xover
so in the latter case you'd have 3
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:15:22PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> Intriguing idea, that. So we would apply zero-phase high-pass
> filters to the second and higher components?
> Should be nice for a test run, but how to keep latency down for live
> electronics and A/V sync? How would we
Charles Veasey wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the information!
>
> Using four subs was mentioned a couple of times. I've never used or
> experienced more than two in an array. What is the justification? I assume
> that given a square room, you'd place one in each corner?
With Ambisonics, using
Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
>> Boardman [boardroomout...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 16 October 2015 14:14
>> To: Surround Sound discussion group
>> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array... Genelec 8010
>> speakers?
>>
&g
Senior Lecturer in Perception
> >> College of Arts
> >> University of Derby
> >>
> >> Tel: 01332 593155
> >>
> >> From: Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
> >> Boardman
: 16 October 2015 12:15
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array... Genelec 8010
speakers?
On 10/15/2015 10:51 PM, Dave Malham wrote:
> One of the things that should be investigated in conjunction with higher
> order Ambisonics material would be to &quo
On 10/15/2015 10:51 PM, Dave Malham wrote:
One of the things that should be investigated in conjunction with higher
order Ambisonics material would be to "fade down" the higher order
components as the frequency drops, thus spreading the bass over more
speakers, reducing the strain on the
Sure there's not a lot of bass coming out of these things but they work
well enough for human voice (not Barry white) but I think we both agree
that a wide dispersal (across all frequencies) is advantageous in larger
installations (probably smaller ones too) and to suggest there is not a
593155
>
> From: Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Jörn
> Nettingsmeier [netti...@stackingdwarves.net]
> Sent: 16 October 2015 12:15
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array.
From: Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Boardman
[boardroomout...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 October 2015 14:14
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array... Genelec 8010
speakers
ty of Derby
>
> Tel: 01332 593155
>
> From: Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
> Boardman [boardroomout...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 October 2015 14:14
> To: Surround Sound discussion group
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] A
When I was caught out by this problem the level of info described in
Sebastian's post wasn't in the manuals so I hadn't thought about it - tho'
I *should *have done, given the fact that I designed one for a magazine
some 4 decades ago :-(
Dave
On 15 October 2015 at 10:31, Sebastian Gabler
The protection circuits likely trip the tweeter first, as its thermal time
constant is much shorter than that of woofer. Also the thermal power handling
of the woofer is much higher. Normally there is an indicator turning red if the
limits are exceeded and protection is activated. Without
I am currently replacing my 32 passive speaker array with genelec 6010s.
These are a cheaper alternative, that are still in stock in a lot of
places. They have exactly the same spec, but unbalanced connections. Which
won't be a problem for small runs. The spl will be fine for a smaller room
like
32 speakers in a 3m * 3m space ? Wow - I'd love to see some pictures if you
get a chance !
On 15 October 2015 at 11:21, Steven Boardman
wrote:
> I am currently replacing my 32 passive speaker array with genelec 6010s.
> These are a cheaper alternative, that are still
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:08:29 +0200, David Pickett wrote :
> At 23:17 14-10-15, Augustine Leudar wrote:
>
> >Yeah actually the lsr308 and lsr305 have been getting rave reviews
> >and cost very little their waveguide gives wide dispersal (good off
> >axis response) which is probably good for
Possibly ambisonics is different - but not all multichannel audio uses
ambisonics - certainly with vbap for example if your speakers are wide
apart you don't want a big gap when panning between them then wider
dispersal would be advantageous if the speakers are very close together I
could see it
Am 15.10.2015 um 07:08 schrieb David Pickett:
At 23:17 14-10-15, Augustine Leudar wrote:
>Yeah actually the lsr308 and lsr305 have been getting rave reviews
and cost
>very little their waveguide gives wide dispersal (good off axis
response)
>which is probably good for spatial audio.
Good
That's specifically true for the 8010s. Their max SPL @ 1 m is app. 105
dB per pair, but the long term SPL is only 91 dB, expressly stated that
it is because of the protection circuit in the manual.
That being said, with 32 speakers, the SPL is 4 time higher than for 2.
That's far beyond
I was wondering about that as I wrote it actually - Sometimes when I have a
large space between speakers I increas the directivity (using ICST) to fill
in holes between speakers when panning - but this is really just spreading
the sound ove rmore speakers rather than relating to the dispersal of
One thing I would be careful of on small, active speakers is the protection
circuits. Sophisticated protection circuits thermally model (or even sense)
the drivers and reduce the gain if one of them is getting near the limits.
This can cause weird, signal dependent, image distortions when one of
On 10/15/2015 11:31 AM, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
That's specifically true for the 8010s. Their max SPL @ 1 m is app. 105
dB per pair, but the long term SPL is only 91 dB, expressly stated that
it is because of the protection circuit in the manual.
That being said, with 32 speakers, the SPL is 4
Yes Jorn - what I mean wide dispersal of a spectrally balanced off axis
response - ie the frequency response doesn't alter radically when you move
up, down, left , right - so to clarify wide dispersal of all frequencies
not just bass
On 15 October 2015 at 14:14, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
On 10/15/2015 03:30 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
I admit there use of the word "ultrasound" is ridiculous - but they do work
On 15 October 2015 at 14:27, Augustine Leudar
wrote:
Here you go Jorn - a speaker with a narrow dispersion pattern - (they call
it parametric
On 10/15/2015 03:41 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
What can I say Jorn - we have some and they work - not as well as
adverstised obviously but strip away the hype they have something thta mor
eor less does as described - you'll have to wait a while for those
measurements ;)
For now, the low
On 10/15/2015 03:59 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 10/15/2015 03:41 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
What can I say Jorn - we have some and they work - not as well as
adverstised obviously but strip away the hype they have something thta
mor
eor less does as described - you'll have to wait a
Well it's more like 2.8m by 3..7m with a very high ceiling slope up towards
the back. It's on a platform in the roof of the building. It is also only
31 speakers really, as the one below is under my chair, and is generally
disconnected. Space is one reason why I want to change to smaller speakers.
I admit there use of the word "ultrasound" is ridiculous - but they do work
On 15 October 2015 at 14:27, Augustine Leudar
wrote:
> Here you go Jorn - a speaker with a narrow dispersion pattern - (they call
> it parametric or sound lazer) :
>
>
I think that what Jorn is saying is that a lot of small speakers is not
good/powerful enough to provide a proper, powerful, dynamic, full range point
in the space, which is still a very popular gesture in most panning methods.
Le 15 oct. 2015 à 14:24, Augustine Leudar
Here you go Jorn - a speaker with a narrow dispersion pattern - (they call
it parametric or sound lazer) :
http://www.soundlazer.com/what-is-a-parametric-speaker/
On 15 October 2015 at 14:14, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 02:35 PM, Augustine Leudar
no - he was saying that speakers with a narrow dispersal dont exist - which
they do. He was also saying that bass radiates more widely than higher
frequencies and is more omin directional - which is true so if speakers are
far apart if you dont have a balanced off axis spectral response then the
another thing David - the B& W are designed for studio/mastering/audiophile
use and so yes sound emanating from the back and sides are not a good thing
especially in a studio environment when you want to control the acoustics
for neutral monitoring - but thats quite a different application to the
On 10/15/2015 02:35 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Possibly ambisonics is different - but not all multichannel audio uses
ambisonics - certainly with vbap for example if your speakers are wide
apart you don't want a big gap when panning between them then wider
dispersal would be advantageous if
What can I say Jorn - we have some and they work - not as well as
adverstised obviously but strip away the hype they have something thta mor
eor less does as described - you'll have to wait a while for those
measurements ;)
On 15 October 2015 at 14:39, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
I did a test with the genelec 6010s I have.
The bass distorts way before before any high frequency problems occur, and
woofer distortion happens before any protection circuit cuts in.. When the
crossover is made higher, more level can be achieved at those frequencies,
with less I'll effects. (I
One of the things that should be investigated in conjunction with higher
order Ambisonics material would be to "fade down" the higher order
components as the frequency drops, thus spreading the bass over more
speakers, reducing the strain on the individual speakers whilst maintaining
the spectral
Thanks everyone for the information!
Using four subs was mentioned a couple of times. I've never used or
experienced more than two in an array. What is the justification? I assume
that given a square room, you'd place one in each corner?
Also - a good point was made regarding the cost
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:14:59PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote:
> Indeed, but for real-world signals bass tends (!) to be higher - at least,
> if you don't want fried ears - so that's where it shows up.
I can only confirm this. The last few months I've been using
a room equipped with 36 small
Yes, those are too expensive given the spatial resolution I'd like. My
budget is ~$30-40k.
If the 8010s seem too weak, then maybe something like the Genelec 8030B or
Meyer MM-4XPD.
Also, for the computer interface, I'm thinking about RME's HDSPe
RayDAT and M-32
DA / M-16 DA
thanks,
Charles
you might want to consider the PMC tb2s the are nice speakers . You can
get an active pair for around 1500 dollars. 8010 will have no bottom end
its tiny.
On 14 October 2015 at 18:51, Charles Veasey
wrote:
> Yes, those are too expensive given the spatial resolution
Hello,
We're upgrading our current 15.2 (Behringer) loudspeaker array. I'd like to
get more spatial resolution and higher quality speakers. Right now I'm
thinking about (32) Genelec 8010 and (2) Genelec 7050B subs.
However, I have some concerns about the Genelec 8010s selling at only $350.
Does
apart from genelec and PMC another speaker I see quite often in these kind
of facilities is the Mackie hr824 - the new mark 2 measures well. You can
check anechoic measurements (time and frequency response) of various
different speaker manufacturers here :
Regarding the room response, delay etc. correction, which would be beneficial
in this application, the smallest Genelec model having these features is 8320
(4 in woofer). Next is 8330 with a 5in woofer.
Best regards,
Ilpo Martikainen
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 20:31, Augustine Leudar
Sent from my iPhone
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 18:31, Augustine Leudar wrote:
>
> Maybe out of your budget - but check out the Genelec 8351 a - they also
> have a room correction system that will work on arrays of up to 32 speakers.
> For those that do not have gear
Maybe out of your budget - but check out the Genelec 8351 a - they also
have a room correction system that will work on arrays of up to 32 speakers.
For those that do not have gear acquisition syndrome here is some
ridiculous holywood styled marketing :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lokCwTKjz0E
Hi
My current speakers are Genelec 8040's. The sub is 7050B, although it isn't
intended to be used with the 8040:s. I use a designated cross-over for
the sub.
The 8040 goes down to 48 Hz, so the sub actually only takes care of the
first two octaves.
The stereo imaging is very good. I have
The rme raydat hdspe only costs £420 (600 dollarsish) amazing value I
thought.
On 14 October 2015 at 19:36, David Pickett wrote:
> At 19:51 14-10-15, Charles Veasey wrote:
>
> >Also, for the computer interface, I'm thinking about RME's HDSPe
> >RayDAT and M-32
> >DA / M-16
All of my spatial sound research has been self funded. As such, Im very
sensitive to the budgetary issues. I had initially selected the then-current
genelec 1028a for my array, but then I discovered that the JBL lsr25 had
flatter response, greater low frequency extension, more acoustic output,
Yeah actually the lsr308 and lsr305 have been getting rave reviews and cost
very little their waveguide gives wide dispersal (good off axis response)
which is probably good for spatial audio. Speaker guru Earl Geddes measured
them flatter than his own speakers. The yamaha hs8 is also popular as a
ps I have the RME raydat - its a great card - you will need the ADAT
converters as well if you dont already. I had behringer ada8000 but they
blew quite often - a power issue which newer versions dont have. Howver the
new 8200 have no such issues and reportably midas preamps. ada8000 about
150
63 matches
Mail list logo