Not arguing with the figures, just stating empirical findings.
Will see if I can find details of the two machines at some point. Ditched one
manufacturer because of poor quality control, so may just have been unlucky.
John
Sent from my iPad
On 5 Nov 2013, at 22:41, Fons Adriaensen
their excuse is, they want to run it on two AA cells, and last ten hours.
Umashankar
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:24:38 +
From: f...@linuxaudio.org
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Core Sound TetraMic
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:09:26PM +, Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote
It's not so much the microphone, but what you connect it to: because of the
relatively low sensitivity, you really need a low-noise pre-amp. I use a Metric
Halo ULN-8, which works extremely well with the TetraMic. The ST450 outputs at
line level, so mic pre-amps are not an issue. And of course,
Hi all,
what other preamps (portable?) are you using with your TetraMic ? I have tested
it with a Motu Traveler which is not bad, and an Edirol R44, which is quite
noisy.
Regards
Moritz
Am 05.11.2013 um 16:16 schrieb John Leonard j...@johnleonard.co.uk:
It's not so much the microphone, but
Hi,
From: John Leonard j...@johnleonard.co.uk
Date: 5 November 2013 15:16:42 GMT
And of course, Australian nature is a damned site louder that the
English variety...
On 5 Nov 2013, at 07:57, David Worrall worr...@avatar.com.au wrote:
I've used the TetraMic almost exclusively for outdoor
Hi,
The main problem in the UK is getting away from ambient noise
(traffic, aircraft, people, barking dogs, wind in trees grass, rain
and other water etc.). Then there's still a residual of Brownian air
motion from everywhere. Apart from frogs if you're patient (or
possibly bees or
Mind you, I have a lovely recording of the Dambusters memorial fly-past that
was ruined both by a BBC news crew in a helicopter, but also by some very cross
Canada Geese. Very spectacular in surround if you need a Lancaster Bomber,
mixed with a helicopter and geese, all from a variety of
On 5 November 2013 08:30, Moritz Fehr m...@moritzfehr.de wrote:
Hi all,
what other preamps (portable?) are you using with your TetraMic ? I have
tested it with a Motu Traveler which is not bad, and an Edirol R44, which
is quite noisy.
Regards
Moritz
I use a first generation MOTU
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 November 2013 21:01
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Core Sound TetraMic
On 5 November 2013 08:30, Moritz Fehr m...@moritzfehr.de wrote:
Hi all,
what other preamps (portable?) are you using with your TetraMic ? I have
tested it with a Motu
On 5 November 2013 14:03, Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk wrote:
what sort of mind-bending effects?
Dr Peter Lennox
For example, virtually rotating the mic while placed over a piano, also to
some degree zooming in and out.
Most clients don't want that on their recordings, but John Oswald
On 11/04/2013 05:29 AM, Len Moskowitz wrote:
Jörn wrote:
now if somebody made an analog tetramic-to-CAT5 interface like the
insta-snake, small box about the size of the handle of an sm58, one end
with 6pin mini-xlr and maybe a rubber gasket to hold the tetramic, four
balancing
Just a short note about noise.
While the ST450 is slightly quieter than TetraMic, in practice, TetraMic
noise has never been a problem when Recording Music .. even in very quiet
studios.
Paul Hodges recorded his son in the Warehouse, a well known studio in
London, so you can judge for
On 11/02/2013 08:51 PM, Michael Chapman wrote:
PS The wonders of recording with fifty metres of CAT-5 lead have to be
experienced !!!
absolutely. we just used an eigenmike (2nd version, with the handle) off
of a 75m cat6 lead, and it was very convenient. i flew it upside-down on
the neutrik
--On 03 November 2013 09:06 + Michael Chapman s...@mchapman.com wrote:
The PP units invert the signal.
My understanding is that the early ones did, but the later ones are
different and do not.
Paul
--
Paul Hodges
___
Sursound mailing list
A CAT-5 socket (in an XLR housing) on umashankar's Zoom is an interesting
possibility ...
Michael
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
--On 03 November 2013 09:06 + Michael Chapman s...@mchapman.com
wrote:
The PP units invert the signal.
My understanding is that the early ones did, but the later ones are
different and do not.
Paul Hodges
Does that mean you can get away with only one
(With CAT-5 there is only
I'm hoping for a demo model quite soon, at which point I'll be able to do
comparisons.
I think a lot of us would appreciate a comprehensive comparison between
the TetraMic the Brahma.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:08 AM, len moskowitz
lenmoskow...@optonline.netwrote:
Laurent,
You can find
, but I will put up my calibration system photos
somewhere and provide a link
umashankar
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:52:15 -0500
From: palme...@mymail.vcu.edu
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Core Sound Tetramic
umashankar, if the kickstarter happens to not reach its goal
Jörn wrote:
now if somebody made an analog tetramic-to-CAT5 interface like the
insta-snake, small box about the size of the handle of an sm58, one end
with 6pin mini-xlr and maybe a rubber gasket to hold the tetramic, four
balancing transformers/ppas to match the twisted pair, and a nice
Greetings,
RE
**I am in the process of acquiring a Surround Mic. Ideally with the Ambisonic
technology. Has anyone ever used the Core Sound Tetramic and if so, could you
provide a evaluation. Thank you.
**Laurent
**if you can live with flimsy connectors and four separate phantom power
Eric C's two cents worth:
I suppose the flimsy connectors are needed to keep size small? Something
like the Game Boy connector (later to be used as FireWire connect) might
be more rugged, but not circular (thus making it more difficult to machine
the mic's body). One does have to be
Just to echo the others, really. The TetraMic has its faults, but at the price,
it can't be beaten, although it looks as though the Brahma (prices are on the
Kickstarter site, Eric C) will run it close. I'm hoping for a demo model quite
soon, at which point I'll be able to do comparisons.
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 08:51:24PM +, John Leonard wrote:
Having been through most of the available tetrahedral arrays,
I now only have the two: a TetraMic, which I use mainly for
indoor music work, at which it excels,
Confirmed.
I wonder if anyone ever tried a Tetramic at the focal
Laurent,
You can find many user comments about TetraMic on our User Comments web
page:
http://core-sound.com/TetraMic/11.php
Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com)
Core Sound LLC
www.core-sound.com
Home of TetraMic
___
Sursound mailing list
: Re: [Sursound] Core Sound Tetramic
On 11/01/2013 08:05 PM, Laurent Wermenlinger wrote:
I am in the process of acquiring a Surround Mic. Ideally with the
Ambisonic technology. Has anyone ever used the Core Sound Tetramic
and if so, could you provide a evaluation. Thank you.
if you can
25 matches
Mail list logo
