--On 13 April 2012 03:08 +0100 Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt
wrote:
I am not sure that any form of surround will make it into the home,
I have quite a lot of commercial surround music recordings, on 5.1 media.
However, because of my recording activities, my surround reproduction
Me for one.
Steve
On 13 Apr 2012, at 08:37, Paul Hodges wrote:
Actually, I'd be interested to know how many people on this list
listen to surround recordings on a surround system for simple
pleasure, as opposed to in the lab or as part of specific
investigations of the process.
Paul
On 13/04/2012 09:07, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 04/13/2012 03:49 AM, Robert Greene wrote:
While the mode of expression is even more emphatic
than my own, RCFA is to my mind right all up
and down the line. Talking about 3rd order is
just castles in the air. As a theoretical mathematician,
I
On 13/04/2012 03:08, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
..
If you promote G format, 99% would see and listen to this as a 5.1
surround file. (An 99% would listen to an UHJ as a stereo file, cos
there are really very few decoders around. In fact, 5.1 seems to be way
more mainstream than decoded UHJ.)
On 13 Apr 2012, at 04:08, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Steven Dive wrote:
IMHO I can't see how FOA isn't clearly worth promoting along with up to
3rd order G-format decodes for 5.1/7.1 setups for home users. Basically,
get UHJ and, while we are at it, superstereo
On 13 Apr 2012, at 10:07, Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net
wrote:
On 04/13/2012 03:49 AM, Robert Greene wrote:
While the mode of expression is even more emphatic
than my own, RCFA is to my mind right all up
and down the line. Talking about 3rd order is
just castles in the
As my 'studio' is my spare room in our flat, I have decent set up where I can
use the surround set-up, which Ronald will be pleased to know uses five matched
loudspeakers, an LFE unit and has proper bass management, to listen for both
work and pleasure. I play my SACD recordings on an
At 02:37 13/04/2012, Paul Hodges wrote:
Actually, I'd be interested to know how many people on this list
listen to surround recordings on a surround system for simple
pleasure, as opposed to in the lab or as part of specific
investigations of the process.
I try to do this; but it is not
/sursound/attachments/20120413/bb8fc69a/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https
, spent a lot of money on it) and have universally come to the same
conclusion.
Case closed.
Mark Stahlman
Brooklyn NY
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120413/bb8fc69a
Could you explain to me this phrase:
Amibsonics (i.e. FOA) is fabulous for AMBIENCE but, alas, not for MUSIC
(due to the lack of frontal emphasis) and c'mon . . . we all know it.
For one, why would I want frontal emphasis? The whole point of Ambisonics is
that it does NOT have any
I think that the idea that surround is not good enough
for music , good enough to matter, really does
not make sense. This is more or less like restricting
the idea of music to what works well enough in stereo
to be all right. But that is not all music, and indeed
for example it does not include
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120413/10ced087/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120413/10ced087/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo
and perhaps even a little entertainment!
Mark Stahlman
Brooklyn NY
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120413/bde7375e/attachment.html
I do. I have two classic Ambisonic decoders, a old Meridian in the
sitting room, decoding to 5.1 speakers (the TV shares the speakers), and
an ancient Minim AD10-based system in my office with 4 good speakers
(soon to be extended to a 6-speaker hexagon array).
Both are horizontal-only, obviously;
/sursound/attachments/20120413/3117c477/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
, and everyone can
just live happily ever after.
[1] the only thing that's probably even cheaper is opinions.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120413/04d2ec7f/attachment.html
system.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120413/084cdc8b/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https
19 matches
Mail list logo
