[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

Mark Matthews is trying to set things straight with the film he's making.

It's confused, and confused further by allegations of buddy deals at 
the top level, so the journalists smell a scandal and ethanol's 
taking collateral damage. The Sydney Morning Herald yarn I posted 
about a week back put it in the same bracket as contaminated petrol 
and unscrupulous operators, with scary stuff about suppressed 
reports of engine damage. This current story's a bit saner:

While no one claimed 10 percent ethanol blends have an adverse impact
on engines, early testing with one type of marine two-stroke engine
found stalling may occur when the throttle is opened from low speed,
even with a 10 percent blend, creating a possible safety hazard, Kemp
said.

I think you tried to answer my question, but I still have it.  I need
to ask again because there's something very specific I'm after here.
In the above paragraph, I think the issue gets confused away from what
I and others are thinking or asking.  The allegation in the above
paragraph is that even below 10% or near it, there is still a danger
to engines.

But this isn't the brunt of the debate that I recall reading here over
the last few months.  From what I've seen of my own engine and others'
experiences, there really isn't that much question that a modest
10%-ish-or-under blend of ethanol doesn't do any sort of damage
(though I suppose I would keep an open mind if someone wanted to tell
me otherwise).  The brunt of the debate is what for me continues to be
an open question: is there anything to the idea that limiting things
to something like 10%, in keeping with what some auto manufacturers
appear to have claimed, would in fact be the right way to go,
especially for what appears to be a nascient effort that could suffer
some severe damage if there really does occur any damage to engines
from using somewhat higher percentages.

If I'm not mistaken there was at least one person in Australia who is
involved with the scene there who took roughly this position ..., that
the big (ADM-ish) ethanol producer was pressuring politically for an
ethanol policy that in the end would not be good for everyone.

I had a car (89 Saab Turbo) which I do recall saying something in the
manual about 10 or 12 or 13 percent ethanol and-or MTBE mixtures being
within warranty.  I don't recall the exact numbers.  While I am not
likely to become an expert on ethanol by going to some of the pages
you suggest, I would like to nail down the basic question here of
whether somewhat higher percentages can bring about somewhat different
issues for motorists.


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

A complete report covering all of the applications of ethanol in 
gasoline, in new and used engines: ERDC Project No 2511 Intensive 
Field Trial of Ethanol/Petrol Blend in Vehicles. This trial showed no 
harm to any engines, and documented the benefits. This is the 
Executive Summary, compliments of Apace Research Ltd -- 10 pages, 
32kb Acrobat file.
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/EthanolApace.PDF

Addendum:

I went and looked at this after posting, as I felt remiss in not
examining it first.  It seems to make a good case for the benefits of
ethanol at a 10% anhydrous blend and does some to address the
allegations of negative effects on machinery.  It does little to
address what I said in my other post appears to be the brunt of the
allegation, which is that since some are mixing in a blend much in
excess of the much-researched 10% figure, this is causing a lot of
damage to machinery. 

To go back to what it does address, it mentions that they found, under
materials compatability and engine wear that there are no
discerniable effects, no increased engine wear, etc., of using such a
blend as against a regular petrol blend.  As it might be useful (God I
hate doing this; I hate the uncopy-pastability of .pdf format), I will
quote directly (manually transcribing, sacrificing fingers for the
cause):

Begin quote:

-

[...] The results of this project for the 1999 fleet composition show
that, when compared to use of neat petrol, use of 10% v/v
ethanol/petrol blend has the following effects:

[...]
[...]

--  Materials Compatibility:

--  there is no discernible effect on any plastic or
elastomer materials; and,
--  there is no discernible corrosion in fuel wetted metal
parts such as fuel tanks, lines, pressure regulators, etc.

--  Engine Wear:

--  there is no additional or unusual wear to that
normally expected; and,
--  there is no additional increase in wear metals or
decrease in total base number (TBN) of the lubcricating oil.

[...]


End quote

Now, there are some other passages which do give perhaps some further
insight on the issues, and I am just not willing to transcribe more.
For example, there is the issue of older vehicles being more prone to
phase separation and other water issues, as well as some health
concerns for emissions.

There is also some mention of other blends, including a hydrous blend,
and a Brazil-ish 22% blend (which sounds almost like what some
Australians are getting whether they want it or not).

But, anyway, the basic issue is left unadressed, and it just sounds
like, going back over the last couple of months, this whole thing
amounts to a good effort (introducing a goodly amount of ethanol use
nationwide for Australia) is being hurt by a campaign to introduce it
in an overly aggressive and somewhat technologically irresponsible way
which might theoretically result in enough of a black eye to provide a
very serious setback.  

If I'm wrong, then I'm sorry for spreading what you or others might
consider to be false information, but I'd like to do a better job of
figuring out the issues on this.  Australia, as I've said, is not
insignificant in its alternative energy efforts.  Although I don't
have a sense of their overall fuel and energy use, this seems to me to
be a very important project for them, to introduce such a high amount
of ethanol to such a significant country's fuel mix, (they sure must
travel a lot of passenger miles between some of their destinations!),
and I think if we take some extra time to hammer out what the issues
are for them, then those of us who are interested to do so can decide
what we think is the right course of action for them and (just by
writing our opinions) perhaps influence their projects and others.

MM

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives

2002-12-19 Thread Darren

Martin

Presently a lot of research and development with vegetable oil
fuels mainly SVO systems.   Also biofuel promotion, lobbying and
consultation.

See www.vegburner.co.uk 

Darren



-Original Message-
From: martin.brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 18 December 2002 08:41
To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives

Very helpfull thankyou. What does vegburner do?




Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] City of Oakland holding a meeting aimed supporting local commercial biodiesel production

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

One would think that the Former Gov Brown would be all over this!!  Great
media opportunity also.  ;-)


On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Kenneth Kron wrote:

 Just thought I'd update the list.  I've been working with with the
 sustainable development person in the planning department in Oakland,
 Carol Misseldine.  Oakland is starting to understand what biodiesel is
 and is turning the beauracracy around to support it.  No date for the
 meeting yet, the attendees include: city, business and community
 representatives.
 
 
 The current agenda is:
 
 KEY AGENDA ITEMS FOR A BIODIESEL MEETING IN OAKLAND
 
 
 Drafted by Carol Misseldine, Oakland Sustainable Development Initiative,
 12/12/02
 
 
 
 *1) What quantities of the following feedstocks are realistically
 available for biodiesel in Oakland?*
 
 Waste Vegetable Oil (WVO)://
 
 //Municipal Waste Stream:
 
 *2) Is biodiesel a realistic solution or partial solution for Oakland's
 air quality problems?*
 
 3) How much of Oakland's diesel needs could be met with the above
 sources, including Oakland's City Fleet, Port trucks, public transit?
 
 4) What are the economic and siting barriers and opportunities for local
 manufacture and distribution of biodiesel?
 
 *5) What are the emissions issues related to a biodiesel manufacturing
 facility?*
 
 *6) What are the zoning requirements for a biodiesel manufacturing
 facility?* /Catherine Payne, CEDA/
 
 *7) What is the status of CARB's intent to rank biodiesel as an
 alternative fuel?* /Randall von Wedel/
 
 *8) Other*
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Fwd: Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:39:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in
  fuel

Australia is a significant country, but it is smaller than Brazil
and if I am not totally wrong a population less than 10% of
that of US. I think it is one of the least populated countries
in the world. Having this in mind, it is still a very important
country and they have very large incentives to reduce their
dependence of fossil fuels. They, if anyone, have the capacity
to go biofuel all around and fast.

To maintain the independence and sovereignty of Australia
should be in the best interest of the Australians and solving
energy supply problems is an important and urgent matter
for the whole world. Few countries, if any, have such good
prospects as Australia. It is maybe one of the very few
countries that could maintain an isolationistic policy to the
rest of the world.

US for sure not, they have to continue to pillage the world
resources. Many say that they support the terrorist, by
paying low price for their pillage, but the truth is that they
themselves creates them. The policies and attitudes are
controversy but necessary, to maintain the American style
of life, carefully guarded by the Americans and called the
greatest democracy on earth. Why I mention US, is because
it is their oil interests that operate in the Australian environment.

It would be utterly irresponsible if Australia do not take the
important and necessary steps to be energy independent.
Scaremongers tactics who use up to 80 years old American
arguments, that was already incorrect then,  is an insult to
the Australian people. Hearing about this kind of tactics,
like advertising ethanol free gasoline etc. makes me mad,
this especially when ethanol is needed to replace MTBE
and this is in full implementation in US.

To make it clear, I like Americans and America very much,
but their corporate/government foreign policies smells. Bophal
is maybe the worst case, but not uncommon on smaller scale.

Hakan


At 02:51 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
  A complete report covering all of the applications of ethanol in
  gasoline, in new and used engines: ERDC Project No 2511 Intensive
  Field Trial of Ethanol/Petrol Blend in Vehicles. This trial showed no
  harm to any engines, and documented the benefits. This is the
  Executive Summary, compliments of Apace Research Ltd -- 10 pages,
  32kb Acrobat file.
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/EthanolApace.PDF
 
 Addendum:
 
 I went and looked at this after posting, as I felt remiss in not
 examining it first.  It seems to make a good case for the benefits of
 ethanol at a 10% anhydrous blend and does some to address the
 allegations of negative effects on machinery.  It does little to
 address what I said in my other post appears to be the brunt of the
 allegation, which is that since some are mixing in a blend much in
 excess of the much-researched 10% figure, this is causing a lot of
 damage to machinery.
 
 To go back to what it does address, it mentions that they found, under
 materials compatability and engine wear that there are no
 discerniable effects, no increased engine wear, etc., of using such a
 blend as against a regular petrol blend.  As it might be useful (God I
 hate doing this; I hate the uncopy-pastability of .pdf format), I will
 quote directly (manually transcribing, sacrificing fingers for the
 cause):
 
 Begin quote:
 
 -
 
 [...] The results of this project for the 1999 fleet composition show
 that, when compared to use of neat petrol, use of 10% v/v
 ethanol/petrol blend has the following effects:
 
 [...]
 [...]
 
 --  Materials Compatibility:
 
  --  there is no discernible effect on any plastic or
 elastomer materials; and,
  --  there is no discernible corrosion in fuel wetted metal
 parts such as fuel tanks, lines, pressure regulators, etc.
 
 --  Engine Wear:
 
  --  there is no additional or unusual wear to that
 normally expected; and,
  --  there is no additional increase in wear metals or
 decrease in total base number (TBN) of the lubcricating oil.
 
 [...]
 
 
 End quote
 
 Now, there are some other passages which do give perhaps some further
 insight on the issues, and I am just not willing to transcribe more.
 For example, there is the issue of older vehicles being more prone to
 phase separation and other water issues, as well as some health
 concerns for emissions.
 
 There is also some mention of other blends, including a hydrous blend,
 and a Brazil-ish 22% blend (which sounds almost like what some
 Australians are getting whether they want it or not).
 
 But, anyway, the basic issue is left unadressed, and it just sounds
 like, going back over the last couple of months, this whole thing
 amounts to a good effort (introducing a goodly amount of ethanol use
 nationwide for 

[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

MM wrote:

 Mark Matthews is trying to set things straight with the film he's making.
 
 It's confused, and confused further by allegations of buddy deals at
 the top level, so the journalists smell a scandal and ethanol's
 taking collateral damage.

It's not just the journalists, more important it's also the political 
opposition:

The Howard government has not just failed to act, they've 
deliberately decided not to act. They've made conscious, continuing 
decisions, including today, to refuse to act because they're putting 
vested interests ahead of the national interest. - Labor's treasury 
spokesman Bob McMullan
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/12/17/1039656387005.html
Ethanol may damage cars

It's in the national interest, you see, to continue depending on 
imported oil and not to use homegrown biofuels - NOT!

And mainly the big foreign oil companies, and the Federal Chamber of 
Automotive Industries (FCAI), which is probably in the oil companies' 
camp, and lesser players.

How about this?
Another thing here with ethanol which people aren't aware of is that 
it actually attracts water and motor vehicles and water just do not 
go together - the cars will just stop cold, he said. (Royal 
Automobile Club of Victoria)
http://www.abc.net.au/news/regionals/vic/regvic-18dec2002-11.htm
ABC News - Ethanol, petrol debate flares

Stop cold, eh? RACV's gone on a sort of anti-ethanol witchhunt to 
protect drivers.

The Sydney Morning Herald yarn I posted
 about a week back put it in the same bracket as contaminated petrol
 and unscrupulous operators, with scary stuff about suppressed
 reports of engine damage. This current story's a bit saner:
 
 While no one claimed 10 percent ethanol blends have an adverse impact
 on engines, early testing with one type of marine two-stroke engine
 found stalling may occur when the throttle is opened from low speed,
 even with a 10 percent blend, creating a possible safety hazard, Kemp
 said.

I think you tried to answer my question, but I still have it.  I need
to ask again because there's something very specific I'm after here.
In the above paragraph, I think the issue gets confused away from what
I and others are thinking or asking.  The allegation in the above
paragraph is that even below 10% or near it, there is still a danger
to engines.

Obviously that's what they're trying to infer - they'd love to say it 
wrecks your motor but it seems this is the best they can do, rather 
lame, an alleged safety hazard for the user, not the engine, in a 
marine situation, not on the road. What's early testing? Was there 
any later testing? Is it the case or not? Maybe they think blowing up 
an alleged political scandal and yelling vested interests is as 
effective as blown-up engines. And maybe it is.

Again, Mike Jureidini said this:

Following some pretty serious scaremongering over the past few
months, the oil companies have launched an intense campaign at the
service station level to denigrate the use of ethanol in the Greater
Sydney/Wollongong Basin.

The tactics being employed are similar to those used by the oil
majors in the U.S.over twenty years ago. Currently BP, Shell, Caltex
and Woolworth's are running no ethanol in our petrol type ads at
badged service stations.

That fits. Mike is the Biofuels Consultant for SAFF and South 
Australia Coordinator for the Biodiesel Association of Australia.

The Australian Biofuels Association in Canberra (more or less 
Australia's equivalent of the NBB) issued this comment in March this 
year:

http://www.australianbiofuelsassociation.org.au/WantToKnow/PDFs/COMMEN 
T%20EAISSUESPAPER.pdf

Comment - Setting An Ethanol Limit In Petrol

Environment Australia released an Issues Paper in January 2001, 
titled Setting the Ethanol Limit in Petrol.

The issues paper is based on a policy recommendation put to the 
Government by Environment Australia to limit ethanol blends with 
petrol to 10% under the Fuel Quality Standards Act 2000. The 
Environment Australia position was strongly supported by the major 
foreign owned oil companies that dominate the Australian transport 
fuel market.

The Association vigorously opposed setting a cap on fuel ethanol in 
the transport fuel market. ABA opposition to the 10% limit was based 
on the following grounds:

* No other fuels in the Australian transport fuel market have had 
regulatory limits imposed on their access that market. No limits are 
imposed on petrol or diesel fuels, or on fossil alternative fuels 
such as CNG and LPG.

* A 10% cap on ethanol, and possibly at a later date on biodiesel, 
thus represents a preferential and uncompetitive market entry barrier 
to renewable alternative fuels in the Australian transport fuel 
market.

* A 10% limit on ethanol ignores the demonstrated wide flexibility 
that ethanol, and advances in automotive technologies, offer for the 
use of a range of blends of domestically produced biofuels in 
Australia and internationally.

* The limit enhances the 

RE: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives

2002-12-19 Thread girl mark

I will post a detailed email about how our Berkeley biodiesel coop is 
organized, but it'll take me a few days to write it up. I get requests for 
this info a lot.
Mark


At 12:32 PM 12/19/2002 +, you wrote:
Martin

 Presently a lot of research and development with vegetable oil
fuels mainly SVO systems.   Also biofuel promotion, lobbying and
consultation.

 See www.vegburner.co.uk

Darren



-Original Message-
From: martin.brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 December 2002 08:41
To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives

Very helpfull thankyou. What does vegburner do?




Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread Hakan Falk



  While no one claimed 10 percent ethanol blends have an adverse impact
  on engines, early testing with one type of marine two-stroke engine
  found stalling may occur when the throttle is opened from low speed,
  even with a 10 percent blend, creating a possible safety hazard, Kemp
  said.

I think that Kemp have a great sense of humor and I am sure that he is
not going let this two-stroke engine have the same consequences as the
Ottomans gun ship in WWI and sink the Australian empire as excuse. LOL!

Hakan



Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

It would be utterly irresponsible if Australia do not take the
important and necessary steps to be energy independent.
Scaremongers tactics who use up to 80 years old American
arguments, that was already incorrect then,  is an insult to
the Australian people. Hearing about this kind of tactics,
like advertising ethanol free gasoline etc. makes me mad,
this especially when ethanol is needed to replace MTBE
and this is in full implementation in US.

Right.  Fine.  But the problem here is that you and I and Keith are
hearing different things coming out of Australia, as to the tactics
that are being employed.

While I've heard a bit of the scaremongering, as with any good lie,
they are mixing enough truth or near-truth to it to make it effective.
So, I am trying to get at what is the effective part of this lie in
order to better address it.

MM

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] (fwd) re: Price of BD

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

I received this private email from someone who is in the industry and
apparently is following the price of BD discussion and did some
research on the matter.  

I think others might be interested in their attempts to research this.

It isn't clear to me from their private email if they were sending it
privately because they did not understand procedures of public posting
or because they were trying to be discreet.  But, as I am not a big
participant in the price-of-BD discussion, I think it might be the
former.  So, I am posting their comments (private information
excluded), and then I will show this to them privately as an example
of posting.

MM

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:34:34 +, wrote:

Dear Mr. Murdoch,

I searched high and low for the FOB price of biodiesel and nobody can
really tell me the average price.  They all said it depends.

The US$1.50 price could be a reasonable FOB price for waste oil BD.
If you can land it at $2.85, it may not be too bad when you add all
the costs in freights and handling.

...

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
DVD Rentals with No Late Fees - Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.ZSp6B/dlOFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives

2002-12-19 Thread martin.brook

Thankyou, much appreciated.
- Original Message -
From: girl mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives


 I will post a detailed email about how our Berkeley biodiesel coop is
 organized, but it'll take me a few days to write it up. I get requests for
 this info a lot.
 Mark


 At 12:32 PM 12/19/2002 +, you wrote:
 Martin
 
  Presently a lot of research and development with vegetable oil
 fuels mainly SVO systems.   Also biofuel promotion, lobbying and
 consultation.
 
  See www.vegburner.co.uk
 
 Darren
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: martin.brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 18 December 2002 08:41
 To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] UK Co-Operatives
 
 Very helpfull thankyou. What does vegburner do?
 
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Fwd: Special Alert -- Don't Delay! Register Now for the Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

From: National Biodiesel Board [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: newsletter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Special Alert -- Don't Delay! Register Now for the 
Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:48:03 -0600

Special Alert÷Donât Delay! Register Now for the Biodiesel Research and
Brainstorming Workshop

If youâre interested in learning about the latest biodiesel research and
technical data from North Americaâs leading experts, register now for the
Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop, January 29-30,2003, in New
Orleans.  Sponsored by the National Biodiesel Board (NBB), the US Department
of Energy, and the US Department of Agriculture, the workshop is a must for
biodiesel researchers and technical personnel, biodiesel fuel suppliers,
engine and fuel injection equipment manufacturers, government agencies
interested in funding biodiesel research and development, and other
stakeholders.

While the final agenda and speakers will remain flexible to help ensure the
latest and best information is shared, the sessions planned for this yearâs
workshop include:
- Recent advancements in improving biodiesel cold flow
properties
- New biodiesel stability test methods and data
- Biodiesel standards with ASTM, the military and the government
- User experience (military, parks, schools, EPACT fleets,
government agencies)
- Biodiesel emissions data (US EPA, CARB, heating oil)
- New engine technology and biodiesel NOx strategies
- Engine data and updates (1000 hour life test results, Original Equipment
Manufacturer input)

ãThe sessions we are planning for this yearâs workshop are substantial and
are designed to maximize the sharing of technical information and practical
experience among participants,ä said Steve Howell, NBB technical director.
ãOur relationship with the engine and fuel injection equipment community has
really grown during the last year, and we anticipate each major engine and
FIE company will send representatives.  This is an area that the industry
made a priority during last yearâs session.ä

If the overwhelming interest in last yearâs brainstorming workshop is any
indicator, those wanting to attend should sign up soon due to a limited
number of registrations.  The deadline for the special discount rate of $139
a night at the beautiful Royal Sonesta Hotel on Bourbon Street in New
Orleans is January 10.  For more information and to register online, visit
www.biodiesel.org.


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] [news]: No beer for Christmas in Venezuela

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=586e=1cid=586u=/nm/20021219/wl_nm/venezuela_dc

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] [news]: No beer for Christmas in Venezuela

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

ooops, meant to post the text as well

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=586e=1cid=586u=/nm/20021219/wl_nm/venezuela_dc

World - Reuters 
 
Venezuela Court Orders Oil Restart as Strike Bites
1 hour, 7 minutes ago  Add World - Reuters to My Yahoo! 
 

By Patrick Markey 

CARACAS, Venezuela (Reuters) - Venezuela's Supreme Court on Friday
ordered the temporary resumption of oil operations closed by an
opposition strike against President Hugo Chavez that has rattled
markets and caused gasoline shortages in the world's No. 5 petroleum
exporter. 


Reuters Photo 


Reuters  
 Slideshow: Venezuela 

  Anti-Chavez Protesters Take to the Streets 
(AP Video)  
 
  

Nearly three weeks into the strike, lines of several hundred cars and
trucks formed outside some gasoline stations. Others were deserted,
posting No Gas signs, as incredulous Venezuelans faced the prospect
of empty gas tanks. 


The ruling applies until the nation's highest court makes a final
decision on the legality of the 18-day-old oil industry shutdown
launched by the president's foes to force him to resign. It was not
clear when that decision would be made. 


Strike leaders, who have vowed to maintain the stoppage until the
president steps down and calls early elections, said they were
examining the decision. But they were clearly angry. 


This is just more pressure and I think it will lead to more
confrontation, said one dissident executive at the state oil firm
PDVSA, who asked not to be identified. 


The court ordered PDVSA officials to obey government instructions to
guarantee operations in the oil sector that have been virtually shut
down by the strike. Government officials swiftly welcomed the ruling. 


The ruling is very clear. They have to return to work. If they don't
they face severe sanctions, Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel told
Reuters. We hope that they recognize the decision of the Supreme
Court. 


Strikers who disregard the court ruling could face jail for contempt.
Chavez has vowed to fight the strike, using the armed forces where
necessary. 


With Venezuela's oil output now down to less than 300,000 barrels per
day from 3.1 million bpd in November, the stoppage is costing millions
of dollars a day, strangling the lifeblood of an economy already in
steep recession. 


Oil prices hit their highest level in two years on Thursday on
deepening supply shock from Venezuela while Washington readied for war
against Iraq. 


CRUNCH FROM GASOLINE, FOOD SHORTAGES 


Chavez, who was elected in 1998 and survived a coup in April, has
dismissed opposition calls for an early vote. The populist president,
who claims most Venezuelans back his left-wing reforms to ease
poverty, says the constitution only allows a referendum on his mandate
in August. 


Struggling to restart oil exports, Chavez has sacked dissident oil
executives leading the strike and has sent troops to take over idled
state-run tankers, refineries and ports. 


The government has also authorized the military to commandeer ships,
trucks and planes to keep supplies moving. 


But shortages were already being felt, triggering a rush to gas
stations around the country. 


At one Caracas station, drivers had slept overnight in their cars to
secure a place in line. National Guard troops and police broke up
quarrels between motorists as tensions flared over the dwindling gas
supplies. 


With less than a week to go before Christmas, shoppers packed
supermarkets in Caracas to buy up thinning stocks of some basic goods
and customers lined the streets outside banks, which are operating
only during limited hours. 


People are buying nervously. Some supplies got to us today, but we
have no corn flour, wheat flour, soft drinks and other basic
products, said one Caracas supermarket chain manager. If there is no
gas this will get critical. 

But with even beer supplies drying up in South America's largest
consumer of lager and ales, many are preparing for a bleak Christmas.
National sports events have been canceled and television channels have
been cluttered with constant political news coverage. 

We can't get beer anywhere, said Ernesto Otero, a manager of a
Caracas bar. With no baseball, no drink, no horse-racing, no
television and no football ... people are going to protest when there
is no alcohol, even more than about oil. 

Venezuela has been gripped by political conflict since April's coup as
the opposition stepped up a campaign of street protests. His foes
accuse the fiery, outspoken Venezuelan leader of ruining the economy,
stirring class warfare and imposing a communist dictatorship in the
Andean nation. 

Chavez has accused the opposition, an alliance of business groups,
unions and civic associations backed mainly by the middle and upper
class, of trying to destroy his self-styled revolution in favor the
nation's impoverished majority. (Additional reporting by Silene
Ramirez, Ana Isabel Martinez, Ibon Villelabeitia) 
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http

Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

Mark Matthews is trying to set things straight with the film he's making.

It's confused, and confused further by allegations of buddy deals at 
the top level, so the journalists smell a scandal and ethanol's 
taking collateral damage. The Sydney Morning Herald yarn I posted 
about a week back put it in the same bracket as contaminated petrol 
and unscrupulous operators, with scary stuff about suppressed 
reports of engine damage. This current story's a bit saner:

While no one claimed 10 percent ethanol blends have an adverse impact
on engines, early testing with one type of marine two-stroke engine
found stalling may occur when the throttle is opened from low speed,
even with a 10 percent blend, creating a possible safety hazard, Kemp
said.

I think you tried to answer my question, but I still have it.  I need
to ask again because there's something very specific I'm after here.
In the above paragraph, I think the issue gets confused away from what
I and others are thinking or asking.  The allegation in the above
paragraph is that even below 10% or near it, there is still a danger
to engines.

But this isn't the brunt of the debate that I recall reading here over
the last few months.  From what I've seen of my own engine and others'
experiences, there really isn't that much question that a modest
10%-ish-or-under blend of ethanol doesn't do any sort of damage
(though I suppose I would keep an open mind if someone wanted to tell
me otherwise).  The brunt of the debate is what for me continues to be
an open question: is there anything to the idea that limiting things
to something like 10%, in keeping with what some auto manufacturers
appear to have claimed, would in fact be the right way to go,
especially for what appears to be a nascient effort that could suffer
some severe damage if there really does occur any damage to engines
from using somewhat higher percentages.

If I'm not mistaken there was at least one person in Australia who is
involved with the scene there who took roughly this position ..., that
the big (ADM-ish) ethanol producer was pressuring politically for an
ethanol policy that in the end would not be good for everyone.

I had a car (89 Saab Turbo) which I do recall saying something in the
manual about 10 or 12 or 13 percent ethanol and-or MTBE mixtures being
within warranty.  I don't recall the exact numbers.  While I am not
likely to become an expert on ethanol by going to some of the pages
you suggest, I would like to nail down the basic question here of
whether somewhat higher percentages can bring about somewhat different
issues for motorists.


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

A complete report covering all of the applications of ethanol in 
gasoline, in new and used engines: ERDC Project No 2511 Intensive 
Field Trial of Ethanol/Petrol Blend in Vehicles. This trial showed no 
harm to any engines, and documented the benefits. This is the 
Executive Summary, compliments of Apace Research Ltd -- 10 pages, 
32kb Acrobat file.
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/EthanolApace.PDF

Addendum:

I went and looked at this after posting, as I felt remiss in not
examining it first.  It seems to make a good case for the benefits of
ethanol at a 10% anhydrous blend and does some to address the
allegations of negative effects on machinery.  It does little to
address what I said in my other post appears to be the brunt of the
allegation, which is that since some are mixing in a blend much in
excess of the much-researched 10% figure, this is causing a lot of
damage to machinery. 

To go back to what it does address, it mentions that they found, under
materials compatability and engine wear that there are no
discerniable effects, no increased engine wear, etc., of using such a
blend as against a regular petrol blend.  As it might be useful (God I
hate doing this; I hate the uncopy-pastability of .pdf format), I will
quote directly (manually transcribing, sacrificing fingers for the
cause):

Begin quote:

-

[...] The results of this project for the 1999 fleet composition show
that, when compared to use of neat petrol, use of 10% v/v
ethanol/petrol blend has the following effects:

[...]
[...]

--  Materials Compatibility:

--  there is no discernible effect on any plastic or
elastomer materials; and,
--  there is no discernible corrosion in fuel wetted metal
parts such as fuel tanks, lines, pressure regulators, etc.

--  Engine Wear:

--  there is no additional or unusual wear to that
normally expected; and,
--  there is no additional increase in wear metals or
decrease in total base number (TBN) of the lubcricating oil.

[...]


End quote

Now, there are some other passages which do give perhaps some further
insight on the issues, and I am just not willing to transcribe more.
For example, there is the issue of older vehicles being more prone to
phase separation and other water issues, as well as some health
concerns for emissions.

There is also some mention of other blends, including a hydrous blend,
and a Brazil-ish 22% blend (which sounds almost like what some
Australians are getting whether they want it or not).

But, anyway, the basic issue is left unadressed, and it just sounds
like, going back over the last couple of months, this whole thing
amounts to a good effort (introducing a goodly amount of ethanol use
nationwide for Australia) is being hurt by a campaign to introduce it
in an overly aggressive and somewhat technologically irresponsible way
which might theoretically result in enough of a black eye to provide a
very serious setback.  

If I'm wrong, then I'm sorry for spreading what you or others might
consider to be false information, but I'd like to do a better job of
figuring out the issues on this.  Australia, as I've said, is not
insignificant in its alternative energy efforts.  Although I don't
have a sense of their overall fuel and energy use, this seems to me to
be a very important project for them, to introduce such a high amount
of ethanol to such a significant country's fuel mix, (they sure must
travel a lot of passenger miles between some of their destinations!),
and I think if we take some extra time to hammer out what the issues
are for them, then those of us who are interested to do so can decide
what we think is the right course of action for them and (just by
writing our opinions) perhaps influence their projects and others.

MM

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Time Magazine features Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel Cells

2002-12-19 Thread Mike Teresa Sundstrom

For a while now I have had it in my mind that I should produce ethanol in my 
back yard from biomass. Make electricity from the ethanol. Then, use the 
electricity to power my home and sell the excess to the power company. Easy 
right. Any coments.
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Time Magazine features Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel Cells


 The only fuel cells that have a future on the mass market are those
 that use liquid fuels - since storage is impractical for gaseous fuels
 like hydrogen  methane.  The only company that I know of that is
 developing Direct Liquid Fuel Cells is Medis Technologies in New York
 (http://www.medistechnologies.com), they are making a fuel cell for
 portable electronics that runs on ethanol without the need for a
 reformer to extract hydrogen or a proton exchange membrane.  Ethanol
 is a renewable liquid fuel made by hydrolyzing and fermenting plant
 matter such as wheat straw, corn stalks, sugar cane, sugar beats, wood
 pulp  sawdust, recycled newspapers  cardboard, etc..  The great
 thing about Medis Technologies approach is that they have a product
 with mass market potential, so they can earn revenue while continuing
 to improve their technology.  In contrast, while automotive
 manufacturers continue to tinker with useless hydrogen-based fuel
 cells, they have yet to sell a single fuel cell-powered vehicle.
 
 Now Time Magazine Europe has acknowledged Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel 
 Cell technology.
 
 http://www.time.com/time/europe/forecast2003/html/mobile.html
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
 
 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Finding source for SVO

2002-12-19 Thread Juan Boveda

Hello Bruce

You could check where is your local Vegetal Oil Refinery or the nearest 
Oilseed Crushing Mill and if they are during the harvest season of whatever 
oilseed they crush, you will have a good chance to get SVO directly from a 
tank of raw veg oil without the refinery cost. Please, use a fine filter 
before you load that stuff in your vehicle fuel tank or use it to make 
BioD.

Regards

Juan

You wrote:

Hi all.  I'm getting ready to do a conversion on my '85 Golf and am 
wondering
how to go about getting raw veggie oil in bulk.  Down the road I'd like to 
use
WVO, but I've heard about people having more problems with it than the
newly pressed variety.

I'm juust wondering what sort of places sell veggie oil in bulk? 
 Restaurant
supply houses?  I'm just not sure where to start looking.

A sidenote:  I'm also checking out the feasibility of bio-diesel in South 
Africa (I
have relatives there).  Any ideas for how to find the market price for 
vegetable
oil in S.A.?

Thanks for your help.  This group has impressed me by being very active and 
helpful.

Bruce


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread Hakan Falk


Australia is a significant country, but it is smaller than Brazil
and if I am not totally wrong a population less than 10% of
that of US. I think it is one of the least populated countries
in the world. Having this in mind, it is still a very important
country and they have very large incentives to reduce their
dependence of fossil fuels. They, if anyone, have the capacity
to go biofuel all around and fast.

To maintain the independence and sovereignty of Australia
should be in the best interest of the Australians and solving
energy supply problems is an important and urgent matter
for the whole world. Few countries, if any, have such good
prospects as Australia. It is maybe one of the very few
countries that could maintain an isolationistic policy to the
rest of the world.

US for sure not, they have to continue to pillage the world
resources. Many say that they support the terrorist, by
paying low price for their pillage, but the truth is that they
themselves creates them. The policies and attitudes are
controversy but necessary, to maintain the American style
of life, carefully guarded by the Americans and called the
greatest democracy on earth. Why I mention US, is because
it is their oil interests that operate in the Australian environment.

It would be utterly irresponsible if Australia do not take the
important and necessary steps to be energy independent.
Scaremongers tactics who use up to 80 years old American
arguments, that was already incorrect then,  is an insult to
the Australian people. Hearing about this kind of tactics,
like advertising ethanol free gasoline etc. makes me mad,
this especially when ethanol is needed to replace MTBE
and this is in full implementation in US.

To make it clear, I like Americans and America very much,
but their corporate/government foreign policies smells. Bophal
is maybe the worst case, but not uncommon on smaller scale.

Hakan


At 02:51 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 A complete report covering all of the applications of ethanol in
 gasoline, in new and used engines: ERDC Project No 2511 Intensive
 Field Trial of Ethanol/Petrol Blend in Vehicles. This trial showed no
 harm to any engines, and documented the benefits. This is the
 Executive Summary, compliments of Apace Research Ltd -- 10 pages,
 32kb Acrobat file.
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/EthanolApace.PDF

Addendum:

I went and looked at this after posting, as I felt remiss in not
examining it first.  It seems to make a good case for the benefits of
ethanol at a 10% anhydrous blend and does some to address the
allegations of negative effects on machinery.  It does little to
address what I said in my other post appears to be the brunt of the
allegation, which is that since some are mixing in a blend much in
excess of the much-researched 10% figure, this is causing a lot of
damage to machinery.

To go back to what it does address, it mentions that they found, under
materials compatability and engine wear that there are no
discerniable effects, no increased engine wear, etc., of using such a
blend as against a regular petrol blend.  As it might be useful (God I
hate doing this; I hate the uncopy-pastability of .pdf format), I will
quote directly (manually transcribing, sacrificing fingers for the
cause):

Begin quote:

-

[...] The results of this project for the 1999 fleet composition show
that, when compared to use of neat petrol, use of 10% v/v
ethanol/petrol blend has the following effects:

[...]
[...]

--  Materials Compatibility:

 --  there is no discernible effect on any plastic or
elastomer materials; and,
 --  there is no discernible corrosion in fuel wetted metal
parts such as fuel tanks, lines, pressure regulators, etc.

--  Engine Wear:

 --  there is no additional or unusual wear to that
normally expected; and,
 --  there is no additional increase in wear metals or
decrease in total base number (TBN) of the lubcricating oil.

[...]


End quote

Now, there are some other passages which do give perhaps some further
insight on the issues, and I am just not willing to transcribe more.
For example, there is the issue of older vehicles being more prone to
phase separation and other water issues, as well as some health
concerns for emissions.

There is also some mention of other blends, including a hydrous blend,
and a Brazil-ish 22% blend (which sounds almost like what some
Australians are getting whether they want it or not).

But, anyway, the basic issue is left unadressed, and it just sounds
like, going back over the last couple of months, this whole thing
amounts to a good effort (introducing a goodly amount of ethanol use
nationwide for Australia) is being hurt by a campaign to introduce it
in an overly aggressive and somewhat technologically irresponsible way
which might theoretically result in enough of a black eye to provide a
very serious setback.

If I'm wrong, then I'm sorry for 

RE: [biofuel] Time Magazine features Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel Cells

2002-12-19 Thread kirk

Cogeneration can help it pencil.
Don't throw the heat away.
download a copy of book MicroCogeneration here
http://www.innerlodge.com/Energy/Micro_Cogeneration/
Kirk

-Original Message-
From: Mike  Teresa Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:07 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Time Magazine features Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel
Cells


For a while now I have had it in my mind that I should produce ethanol in my
back yard from biomass. Make electricity from the ethanol. Then, use the
electricity to power my home and sell the excess to the power company. Easy
right. Any coments.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Time Magazine features Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel Cells


 The only fuel cells that have a future on the mass market are those
 that use liquid fuels - since storage is impractical for gaseous fuels
 like hydrogen  methane.  The only company that I know of that is
 developing Direct Liquid Fuel Cells is Medis Technologies in New York
 (http://www.medistechnologies.com), they are making a fuel cell for
 portable electronics that runs on ethanol without the need for a
 reformer to extract hydrogen or a proton exchange membrane.  Ethanol
 is a renewable liquid fuel made by hydrolyzing and fermenting plant
 matter such as wheat straw, corn stalks, sugar cane, sugar beats, wood
 pulp  sawdust, recycled newspapers  cardboard, etc..  The great
 thing about Medis Technologies approach is that they have a product
 with mass market potential, so they can earn revenue while continuing
 to improve their technology.  In contrast, while automotive
 manufacturers continue to tinker with useless hydrogen-based fuel
 cells, they have yet to sell a single fuel cell-powered vehicle.

 Now Time Magazine Europe has acknowledged Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel
 Cell technology.

 http://www.time.com/time/europe/forecast2003/html/mobile.html



 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/2002


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Corporate enviros

2002-12-19 Thread harley3

Keith



I apologize if I have insult you.  Keith, I was not directing any of this
venting towards you directly.   All my working life I have worked for only
big companies.  Not by design, but that is just how it worked out.



My working history has been in the maintenance area.  I have worked from a
repair mechanic position to plant engineering, and everything between.No
body wants to poison the air or land that our grand children will be
inheriting.Even though I am not an Environmental engineer, I have worked
on the outer edges of some of the environmental issues.  I have dealt
directly with people with wild accusations, and I have become desensitized.
I have dealt with some of the following:  Chemical dumping into cemented
over sewer drains.  Disconnected smoke stacks pumping out to much smoke.
Too much vibration city blocks away from the plant.  All of the parking lot
are covering chemical dumpsites, and must be dug-up.   Using too much
electricity because a personâs air conditioning was not working.   And of
course the famous the non-existing company helicopter is making to much
noise.  I have tried to honesty deal with the complaints, but most of the
time.  It is like talking to a wall.  They know the company is doing
something wrong.  Most of them watch TV news media, and know how Big
Companies are always doing something wrong.  Why is being big, equals
something bad.  Big oil, big business, big government.



I cannot speak for any company, but most are not as bad as you may perceive
them to be.



In the future I will finish reading before going off in a direction.


  Harley


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Finding source for SVO

2002-12-19 Thread damiandolan

Hi to all,

I am looking for some-one in the states for purchase bulk vegetable oil, for 
export.

Regards,
Damian Dolan

biofuel@yahoogroups.com wrote:

  
  Bruce, where are you located?  If in the US you might want to get a hold
  of ADM as they sell both Soy and Corn oil, most likely in bulk.  Check
  around online for some smaller producers that don't use GMO
  feedstock. Search engines are a wonderful tools .  ;-)
  
  BTW, I was at Costco this weekend and noted the various (somewhat
  bulk) oil they have there, the corn and soy from ADM . 
  
  
  James Slayden
  
  
  On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, bruce_leininger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hi all.  I'm getting ready to do a conversion on my '85 Golf and am
   wondering
   how to go about getting raw veggie oil in bulk.  Down the road I'd like
   to use
   WVO, but I've heard about people having more problems with it than the
   newly pressed variety. 
   
   I'm juust wondering what sort of places sell veggie oil in bulk? 
   Restaurant
   supply houses?  I'm just not sure where to start looking.
   
   A sidenote:  I'm also checking out the feasibility of bio-diesel in South
   Africa (I
   have relatives there).  Any ideas for how to find the market price for
   vegetable
   oil in S.A.?
   
   Thanks for your help.  This group has impressed me by being very active
   and
   helpful.
   
   Bruce
   
   
   Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
   http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
   
   Biofuels list archives:
   http://archive.nnytech.net/
   
   Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
   To unsubscribe, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
   
  
  
  
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
  
  
  




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: BD at $1.50/gallon

2002-12-19 Thread Myles Twete

Thor from Arlington, Wa.:

If you find yourself down here in Portland, Or., there is some availability
of BD100 from used fryer oil at $1.80/gallon.
Where?
Donaldson's Marina (aka PacMar) on the Oregon side of the Columbia River
Directions:
South on I-5 into Oregon, exit Marine Dr., East on Marine to PacMar at
around 37th.  Walk to the end of the dock with your fuel can.

Availability is sporadic, but this winter it's good so far since the boaters
are mostly sitting still not buying any, so the marina has perhaps a couple
hundred gallons right now.  I've been able to purchase bulk B100 locally at
a delivered cost of about $1.55/gallon for home heating ala oil furnace.

myles twete, Portland


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

Depends on where you get it  

The folks from San Luis Obispo indicated that they were paying $2.85gal
from a local distributor.  People who are members of the Berkley BD Co-op
pay $1, non-members pay $2.  I have heard pump prices ranging from ~$2.35
to $2.65.  I suppose it depends on feedstock price, the manufactures cost,
the distributors markup, so the mileage may vary.

Also, remember that in Cali it is becoming a hip thing to be using BD so
the price will increase with Envro-Yuppie status.  ;-)  (hrmm, designer
BD?!!!  My oil is organic and vegan .  hehehehehehe).


James Slayden


On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Hi Thor and MM
 
  WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around
  $1.50?  I pay $2.65/gallon (and believe me, that
  hurts).
 
 Sorry Thor, I see that was an industry figure I checked, not a pump
 figure. But I think somebody has said they're buying commercial brew
 for $2. Somebody else quoted $1.75, but that was B20. Still, you're
 paying much less than most people in the world pay for their fuel.
 American fuel is much to cheap!
 
 Graham Noyes at World Energy never did tell their costings, but we
 did learn that last year they were offering producers $0.85 per
 gallon. So the retail price is +200%?
 
  I know you're going to tell me to start brewing my
  own--and you're right.
 
 No, I wouldn't say that, depends on your circumstances, and your
 preferences. But if you think I'd be right then I guess you'll get
 round it when you can. :-)
 
  But I am curious if you have
  info on regional pricing for biodiesel.
 
 Not offhand, I'll see if I come across anything.
 
 Even if one brews one's own, one should put a value on one's time and
 materials costs.  I realize that there are many who don't put as high
 a value on division of labor as others, but I am just pointing this
 out.  I do not assign a cost of zero to my own time or labor in doing
 things on my own that I'd rather consider paying someone else to do.
 
 Todd's done costings for a batch-processing set-up that includes
 everything, labour, rents, utilitities, insurance, maintenance and
 truck lease for collection, etc, for a 3,000 gpd facility generating
 1,050,000 gallons a year, cost of production well under $0.60 a
 gallon.
 
 On a smaller scale, Chuck Ranum, for instance, seems to spend not
 more than a few seconds per gallon making his biodiesel. He tells the
 pump to add the methoxide, then he goes away, comes back later. Dale
 sits and watches if he wants to. Ian just switches it on and comes
 back every now and then, makes it once a month. Aleks and his pal Mat
 usually hang around but don't take much notice, get on with other
 things.
 
 The process itself and all its various steps might take time, but it
 needn't take you time. Once you set it up properly there's not that
 much to do.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

Hey Keith,

On that note, it would be great to pull together a table to get prices
around the US/World for BD.  Prices need to be verified by a scanned
reciept or picture of the pump though.  It would help people to decide if
they want to buy or produce themselves based just on pump cost.

James Slayden



On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Hi Thor and MM
 
  WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around
  $1.50?  I pay $2.65/gallon (and believe me, that
  hurts).
 
 Sorry Thor, I see that was an industry figure I checked, not a pump
 figure. But I think somebody has said they're buying commercial brew
 for $2. Somebody else quoted $1.75, but that was B20. Still, you're
 paying much less than most people in the world pay for their fuel.
 American fuel is much to cheap!
 
 Graham Noyes at World Energy never did tell their costings, but we
 did learn that last year they were offering producers $0.85 per
 gallon. So the retail price is +200%?
 
  I know you're going to tell me to start brewing my
  own--and you're right.
 
 No, I wouldn't say that, depends on your circumstances, and your
 preferences. But if you think I'd be right then I guess you'll get
 round it when you can. :-)
 
  But I am curious if you have
  info on regional pricing for biodiesel.
 
 Not offhand, I'll see if I come across anything.
 
 Even if one brews one's own, one should put a value on one's time and
 materials costs.  I realize that there are many who don't put as high
 a value on division of labor as others, but I am just pointing this
 out.  I do not assign a cost of zero to my own time or labor in doing
 things on my own that I'd rather consider paying someone else to do.
 
 Todd's done costings for a batch-processing set-up that includes
 everything, labour, rents, utilitities, insurance, maintenance and
 truck lease for collection, etc, for a 3,000 gpd facility generating
 1,050,000 gallons a year, cost of production well under $0.60 a
 gallon.
 
 On a smaller scale, Chuck Ranum, for instance, seems to spend not
 more than a few seconds per gallon making his biodiesel. He tells the
 pump to add the methoxide, then he goes away, comes back later. Dale
 sits and watches if he wants to. Ian just switches it on and comes
 back every now and then, makes it once a month. Aleks and his pal Mat
 usually hang around but don't take much notice, get on with other
 things.
 
 The process itself and all its various steps might take time, but it
 needn't take you time. Once you set it up properly there's not that
 much to do.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] engine coversion

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

hey, a guy Michael at the BD class indicated that he is going to replace
his petrol engine in a Ford Ranger w/ a 4cyl diesel from a Lay's potato
chip truck.  That might work for your Samurai.  Sorry, I don't have his
email address.

James Slayden

On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hello i dont know how to convert the motor , but if you find out I would
 love
 to know .
 I have a samurai i would like to covert

 thanks ken r.
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

Hey Keith,

On that note, it would be great to pull together a table to get prices
around the US/World for BD.  Prices need to be verified by a scanned
reciept or picture of the pump though.  It would help people to decide if
they want to buy or produce themselves based just on pump cost.

James Slayden


Hi James

Yes, that would be great, but a lot of research and a lot of constant 
maintenance keeping it up to date, and I'm not into doing it I'm 
afraid. If anyone else wants to I'd consider hosting it at Journey to 
Forever (though I'd still have to get involved in maintenance and 
updates). Sorry, not being reluctant, just being realistic (or trying 
to be).

regards

Keith



On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

  Hi Thor and MM
 
   WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around
   $1.50?  I pay $2.65/gallon (and believe me, that
   hurts).
 
  Sorry Thor, I see that was an industry figure I checked, not a pump
  figure. But I think somebody has said they're buying commercial brew
  for $2. Somebody else quoted $1.75, but that was B20. Still, you're
  paying much less than most people in the world pay for their fuel.
  American fuel is much to cheap!
 
  Graham Noyes at World Energy never did tell their costings, but we
  did learn that last year they were offering producers $0.85 per
  gallon. So the retail price is +200%?
 
   I know you're going to tell me to start brewing my
   own--and you're right.
 
  No, I wouldn't say that, depends on your circumstances, and your
  preferences. But if you think I'd be right then I guess you'll get
  round it when you can. :-)
 
   But I am curious if you have
   info on regional pricing for biodiesel.
 
  Not offhand, I'll see if I come across anything.
 
  Even if one brews one's own, one should put a value on one's time and
  materials costs.  I realize that there are many who don't put as high
  a value on division of labor as others, but I am just pointing this
  out.  I do not assign a cost of zero to my own time or labor in doing
  things on my own that I'd rather consider paying someone else to do.
 
  Todd's done costings for a batch-processing set-up that includes
  everything, labour, rents, utilitities, insurance, maintenance and
  truck lease for collection, etc, for a 3,000 gpd facility generating
  1,050,000 gallons a year, cost of production well under $0.60 a
  gallon.
 
  On a smaller scale, Chuck Ranum, for instance, seems to spend not
  more than a few seconds per gallon making his biodiesel. He tells the
  pump to add the methoxide, then he goes away, comes back later. Dale
  sits and watches if he wants to. Ian just switches it on and comes
  back every now and then, makes it once a month. Aleks and his pal Mat
  usually hang around but don't take much notice, get on with other
  things.
 
  The process itself and all its various steps might take time, but it
  needn't take you time. Once you set it up properly there's not that
  much to do.
 
  Best
 
  Keith


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Rent DVDs Online-No late fees! Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XfSp7B/XlOFAA/46VHAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

MM wrote:

 Mark Matthews is trying to set things straight with the film he's making.
 
 It's confused, and confused further by allegations of buddy deals at
 the top level, so the journalists smell a scandal and ethanol's
 taking collateral damage.

It's not just the journalists, more important it's also the political 
opposition:

The Howard government has not just failed to act, they've 
deliberately decided not to act. They've made conscious, continuing 
decisions, including today, to refuse to act because they're putting 
vested interests ahead of the national interest. - Labor's treasury 
spokesman Bob McMullan
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/12/17/1039656387005.html
Ethanol may damage cars

It's in the national interest, you see, to continue depending on 
imported oil and not to use homegrown biofuels - NOT!

And mainly the big foreign oil companies, and the Federal Chamber of 
Automotive Industries (FCAI), which is probably in the oil companies' 
camp, and lesser players.

How about this?
Another thing here with ethanol which people aren't aware of is that 
it actually attracts water and motor vehicles and water just do not 
go together - the cars will just stop cold, he said. (Royal 
Automobile Club of Victoria)
http://www.abc.net.au/news/regionals/vic/regvic-18dec2002-11.htm
ABC News - Ethanol, petrol debate flares

Stop cold, eh? RACV's gone on a sort of anti-ethanol witchhunt to 
protect drivers.

The Sydney Morning Herald yarn I posted
 about a week back put it in the same bracket as contaminated petrol
 and unscrupulous operators, with scary stuff about suppressed
 reports of engine damage. This current story's a bit saner:
 
 While no one claimed 10 percent ethanol blends have an adverse impact
 on engines, early testing with one type of marine two-stroke engine
 found stalling may occur when the throttle is opened from low speed,
 even with a 10 percent blend, creating a possible safety hazard, Kemp
 said.

I think you tried to answer my question, but I still have it.  I need
to ask again because there's something very specific I'm after here.
In the above paragraph, I think the issue gets confused away from what
I and others are thinking or asking.  The allegation in the above
paragraph is that even below 10% or near it, there is still a danger
to engines.

Obviously that's what they're trying to infer - they'd love to say it 
wrecks your motor but it seems this is the best they can do, rather 
lame, an alleged safety hazard for the user, not the engine, in a 
marine situation, not on the road. What's early testing? Was there 
any later testing? Is it the case or not? Maybe they think blowing up 
an alleged political scandal and yelling vested interests is as 
effective as blown-up engines. And maybe it is.

Again, Mike Jureidini said this:

Following some pretty serious scaremongering over the past few
months, the oil companies have launched an intense campaign at the
service station level to denigrate the use of ethanol in the Greater
Sydney/Wollongong Basin.

The tactics being employed are similar to those used by the oil
majors in the U.S.over twenty years ago. Currently BP, Shell, Caltex
and Woolworth's are running no ethanol in our petrol type ads at
badged service stations.

That fits. Mike is the Biofuels Consultant for SAFF and South 
Australia Coordinator for the Biodiesel Association of Australia.

The Australian Biofuels Association in Canberra (more or less 
Australia's equivalent of the NBB) issued this comment in March this 
year:

http://www.australianbiofuelsassociation.org.au/WantToKnow/PDFs/COMMEN 
T%20EAISSUESPAPER.pdf

Comment - Setting An Ethanol Limit In Petrol

Environment Australia released an Issues Paper in January 2001, 
titled Setting the Ethanol Limit in Petrol.

The issues paper is based on a policy recommendation put to the 
Government by Environment Australia to limit ethanol blends with 
petrol to 10% under the Fuel Quality Standards Act 2000. The 
Environment Australia position was strongly supported by the major 
foreign owned oil companies that dominate the Australian transport 
fuel market.

The Association vigorously opposed setting a cap on fuel ethanol in 
the transport fuel market. ABA opposition to the 10% limit was based 
on the following grounds:

* No other fuels in the Australian transport fuel market have had 
regulatory limits imposed on their access that market. No limits are 
imposed on petrol or diesel fuels, or on fossil alternative fuels 
such as CNG and LPG.

* A 10% cap on ethanol, and possibly at a later date on biodiesel, 
thus represents a preferential and uncompetitive market entry barrier 
to renewable alternative fuels in the Australian transport fuel 
market.

* A 10% limit on ethanol ignores the demonstrated wide flexibility 
that ethanol, and advances in automotive technologies, offer for the 
use of a range of blends of domestically produced biofuels in 
Australia and internationally.

* The limit enhances the 

Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

NP, just an idea.  :)  I see your point tho.  Adminstration is the biggest
time sink there is.


On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Hey Keith,
 
 On that note, it would be great to pull together a table to get prices
 around the US/World for BD.  Prices need to be verified by a scanned
 reciept or picture of the pump though.  It would help people to decide
 if
 they want to buy or produce themselves based just on pump cost.
 
 James Slayden
 
 
 Hi James
 
 Yes, that would be great, but a lot of research and a lot of constant
 maintenance keeping it up to date, and I'm not into doing it I'm
 afraid. If anyone else wants to I'd consider hosting it at Journey to
 Forever (though I'd still have to get involved in maintenance and
 updates). Sorry, not being reluctant, just being realistic (or trying
 to be).
 
 regards
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:
 
   Hi Thor and MM
  
WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around
$1.50?  I pay $2.65/gallon (and believe me, that
hurts).
  
   Sorry Thor, I see that was an industry figure I checked, not a pump
   figure. But I think somebody has said they're buying commercial brew
   for $2. Somebody else quoted $1.75, but that was B20. Still, you're
   paying much less than most people in the world pay for their fuel.
   American fuel is much to cheap!
  
   Graham Noyes at World Energy never did tell their costings, but we
   did learn that last year they were offering producers $0.85 per
   gallon. So the retail price is +200%?
  
I know you're going to tell me to start brewing my
own--and you're right.
  
   No, I wouldn't say that, depends on your circumstances, and your
   preferences. But if you think I'd be right then I guess you'll get
   round it when you can. :-)
  
But I am curious if you have
info on regional pricing for biodiesel.
  
   Not offhand, I'll see if I come across anything.
  
   Even if one brews one's own, one should put a value on one's time
 and
   materials costs.  I realize that there are many who don't put as
 high
   a value on division of labor as others, but I am just pointing
 this
   out.  I do not assign a cost of zero to my own time or labor in
 doing
   things on my own that I'd rather consider paying someone else to do.
  
   Todd's done costings for a batch-processing set-up that includes
   everything, labour, rents, utilitities, insurance, maintenance and
   truck lease for collection, etc, for a 3,000 gpd facility generating
   1,050,000 gallons a year, cost of production well under $0.60 a
   gallon.
  
   On a smaller scale, Chuck Ranum, for instance, seems to spend not
   more than a few seconds per gallon making his biodiesel. He tells the
   pump to add the methoxide, then he goes away, comes back later. Dale
   sits and watches if he wants to. Ian just switches it on and comes
   back every now and then, makes it once a month. Aleks and his pal Mat
   usually hang around but don't take much notice, get on with other
   things.
  
   The process itself and all its various steps might take time, but it
   needn't take you time. Once you set it up properly there's not that
   much to do.
  
   Best
  
   Keith
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] engine coversion

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

That would be some good links to post.

On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, craig reece wrote:

 There are kits available to stick a VW 1.6 or 1.9 diesel engine in the
 Samurai. Let me know if you can't find them via Google.
 
 Craig
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   hello i dont know how to convert the motor , but if you find out I
  would love
  to know .
  I have a samurai i would like to covert
 
  thanks ken r.
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: Building a biodiesel tank

2002-12-19 Thread Glenn

I need to find out what metals are impervious to
biodiesel's corrosiveness. Can fittings be
sweated with copper or lead, or should they be
welded with steel wire, should fitting be
stainless steel, brass, copper...etc.

Any help is appreciated.

G

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread girl mark

The local pump price for World Energy new soy oil -derived biodiesel fuel 
at Olympian in San Francisco is about $3.35 a gallon or something like 
that. It just went up from a slightly lower price after the soy subsidies 
were cut (?or some such reason).Olympian is a cardlock pump- they are a 
commercial fueling station for fleets, and opened one biodiesel pump. 
Customers pre-pay for a certain number of gallons . I don't remember the 
minumum, but it is a lot I think (Sorry if I'm wrong).  Despite the cost, 
there are 300 cardholders at the moment (source: dave williamson who works 
closely with the fuel broker cytoculture)
At Renner in Northern California (Arcata and Garbervile) I think it's 
around $2.80 or something like that, don't remember exactly. Regular 
petroleum is really expensive there, though (close-ish to $2 a gallon 
sometimes) so it's a relatively good deal if you're the least bit 
enviroconscious. Renner is also a cardlock system, and there's a minumum 
purchase of something like $50 (I also could be wrong on this as well)

Also look at the Yokayo Biofuels website for their rates, that's who a lot 
of people in Northern California are getting their fuel from, at lower rate 
than the pump above, and that all includes home delivery.

but an important correction to James' post:

Our coop doesn't 'buy' fuel and doesn't sell it- we make our own and we do 
tie together reimbursement for equipment/chemicals costs to a per-gallon 
rate for fuel produced, but it is not a purchase. It makes it so that 
people using fuel are not only paying for the costs of making the fuel 
(easy to track as we know what our costs for chemicals are) but also 
helping fundraise for more equipment. We are on a shoestring budget and 
constantly trying to slowly get equipment upgrades (shameless plug: anybody 
local got a used transfer pump or a gallon flowmeter to sell us, or some 
used respirator facepieces, or a circulating pump for a solar hot water 
system, or some 3/4 ball valves, or some gasketed drum covers, or a cheap 
balance beam scale?).

Reimbursing ourselves per gallon of fuel taken is one way to track it and 
to distribute the costs to the users who are getting the most benefit- ie 
those actually using fuel  (we have lots of members who do not use 
biodiesel yet, or who are in the coop as an educational or biodiesel 
advocacy organization). We don't 'sell' to nonmembers, you have to be a 
member to get fuel at all. What James was referring to is that we do have a 
two-tier system for the reimbursement rate (which works poorly at the 
moment). The two-tier rate raises money at a rate either twice or four 
times our chemicals costs per gallon (ie we spend .50/gallon for costs, and 
reimburse the co-op $1 a gallon or $2 a gallon, as we have no other funding 
source other than very low quarterly dues ($25 every three months). The two 
tier rate is partly voluntary (ie the theory is that if you're a 
superpayer/superdonator you get to be in the Canola Club and get a 
55-gallon drum or tank named after you and your name inscribed on the wall 
and a little dance done in your honor, or whatever similarly silly honors 
you choose. We have a 350-gallon tote named Dave for Dave Williamson for 
all his help in the project, and one named Randall for Randall Van Wiedel 
(sp??) for finding us the totes for cheap. They missed getting the little 
dance though). The rate is also partly based on whether you worked on the 
particular batch or not. It doesn't work well and is an 
accounting/paperwork nightmare, however, so I wouldn't recommend that 
another co-op or group do this kind of thing.
Mark

At 09:41 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Depends on where you get it  

The folks from San Luis Obispo indicated that they were paying $2.85gal
from a local distributor.  People who are members of the Berkley BD Co-op
pay $1, non-members pay $2.  I have heard pump prices ranging from ~$2.35
to $2.65.  I suppose it depends on feedstock price, the manufactures cost,
the distributors markup, so the mileage may vary.

Also, remember that in Cali it is becoming a hip thing to be using BD so
the price will increase with Envro-Yuppie status.  ;-)  (hrmm, designer
BD?!!!  My oil is organic and vegan .  hehehehehehe).


James Slayden


On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

  Hi Thor and MM
 
   WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around
   $1.50?  I pay $2.65/gallon (and believe me, that
   hurts).
 
  Sorry Thor, I see that was an industry figure I checked, not a pump
  figure. But I think somebody has said they're buying commercial brew
  for $2. Somebody else quoted $1.75, but that was B20. Still, you're
  paying much less than most people in the world pay for their fuel.
  American fuel is much to cheap!
 
  Graham Noyes at World Energy never did tell their costings, but we
  did learn that last year they were offering producers $0.85 per
  gallon. So the retail price is +200%?
 
   I know you're going to 

Re: [biofuel] engine coNversion

2002-12-19 Thread Glenn



Some diesel conversions for the Suzuki Samurai

http://www.keltec.com/hardware/suzuki.html
http://www.rocky-road.com/diesel.html


Do some investigating, its very do-able.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=VW+diesel+Suzuki+Samurai

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

It would be utterly irresponsible if Australia do not take the
important and necessary steps to be energy independent.
Scaremongers tactics who use up to 80 years old American
arguments, that was already incorrect then,  is an insult to
the Australian people. Hearing about this kind of tactics,
like advertising ethanol free gasoline etc. makes me mad,
this especially when ethanol is needed to replace MTBE
and this is in full implementation in US.

Right.  Fine.  But the problem here is that you and I and Keith are
hearing different things coming out of Australia, as to the tactics
that are being employed.

While I've heard a bit of the scaremongering, as with any good lie,
they are mixing enough truth or near-truth to it to make it effective.
So, I am trying to get at what is the effective part of this lie in
order to better address it.

MM

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

I stand corrected, I think I was mixing up the tier system.  And yes you
have to be a member of the co-op to get fuel.  Selling is a bad term on my
part, suggested donation or re-imbursment cost is better terminology.  

Although I recently saw an article that even non-profits can sell things
as long as the money is utilized for non-profit operating and
administrative costs.  Something to be explored for a small producer.

www.compasspoint.org for many modern non-profit things

James Slayden



On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

 The local pump price for World Energy new soy oil -derived biodiesel fuel
 at Olympian in San Francisco is about $3.35 a gallon or something like
 that. It just went up from a slightly lower price after the soy subsidies
 were cut (?or some such reason).Olympian is a cardlock pump- they are a
 commercial fueling station for fleets, and opened one biodiesel pump.
 Customers pre-pay for a certain number of gallons . I don't remember the
 minumum, but it is a lot I think (Sorry if I'm wrong).  Despite the cost,
 there are 300 cardholders at the moment (source: dave williamson who
 works
 closely with the fuel broker cytoculture)
 At Renner in Northern California (Arcata and Garbervile) I think it's
 around $2.80 or something like that, don't remember exactly. Regular
 petroleum is really expensive there, though (close-ish to $2 a gallon
 sometimes) so it's a relatively good deal if you're the least bit
 enviroconscious. Renner is also a cardlock system, and there's a minumum
 purchase of something like $50 (I also could be wrong on this as well)
 
 Also look at the Yokayo Biofuels website for their rates, that's who a
 lot
 of people in Northern California are getting their fuel from, at lower
 rate
 than the pump above, and that all includes home delivery.
 
 but an important correction to James' post:
 
 Our coop doesn't 'buy' fuel and doesn't sell it- we make our own and we
 do
 tie together reimbursement for equipment/chemicals costs to a per-gallon
 rate for fuel produced, but it is not a purchase. It makes it so that
 people using fuel are not only paying for the costs of making the fuel
 (easy to track as we know what our costs for chemicals are) but also
 helping fundraise for more equipment. We are on a shoestring budget and
 constantly trying to slowly get equipment upgrades (shameless plug:
 anybody
 local got a used transfer pump or a gallon flowmeter to sell us, or some
 used respirator facepieces, or a circulating pump for a solar hot water
 system, or some 3/4 ball valves, or some gasketed drum covers, or a
 cheap
 balance beam scale?).
 
 Reimbursing ourselves per gallon of fuel taken is one way to track it and
 to distribute the costs to the users who are getting the most benefit- ie
 those actually using fuel  (we have lots of members who do not use
 biodiesel yet, or who are in the coop as an educational or biodiesel
 advocacy organization). We don't 'sell' to nonmembers, you have to be a
 member to get fuel at all. What James was referring to is that we do have
 a
 two-tier system for the reimbursement rate (which works poorly at the
 moment). The two-tier rate raises money at a rate either twice or four
 times our chemicals costs per gallon (ie we spend .50/gallon for costs,
 and
 reimburse the co-op $1 a gallon or $2 a gallon, as we have no other
 funding
 source other than very low quarterly dues ($25 every three months). The
 two
 tier rate is partly voluntary (ie the theory is that if you're a
 superpayer/superdonator you get to be in the Canola Club and get a
 55-gallon drum or tank named after you and your name inscribed on the
 wall
 and a little dance done in your honor, or whatever similarly silly honors
 you choose. We have a 350-gallon tote named Dave for Dave Williamson for
 all his help in the project, and one named Randall for Randall Van Wiedel
 (sp??) for finding us the totes for cheap. They missed getting the little
 dance though). The rate is also partly based on whether you worked on the
 particular batch or not. It doesn't work well and is an
 accounting/paperwork nightmare, however, so I wouldn't recommend that
 another co-op or group do this kind of thing.
 Mark
 
 At 09:41 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 Depends on where you get it  
 
 The folks from San Luis Obispo indicated that they were paying $2.85gal
 from a local distributor.  People who are members of the Berkley BD
 Co-op
 pay $1, non-members pay $2.  I have heard pump prices ranging from
 ~$2.35
 to $2.65.  I suppose it depends on feedstock price, the manufactures
 cost,
 the distributors markup, so the mileage may vary.
 
 Also, remember that in Cali it is becoming a hip thing to be using BD
 so
 the price will increase with Envro-Yuppie status.  ;-)  (hrmm, designer
 BD?!!!  My oil is organic and vegan .  hehehehehehe).
 
 
 James Slayden
 
 
 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:
 
   Hi Thor and MM
  
WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around

Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

In the work I do (wireless Internet) we are finding that Tiered cost
structures are also becoming a nightmare to administrate.  It might be
just better if the Co-op just charges everyone $2 and continue to keep the
$25/qrtr $100/yr membership.  Considering that Diesel #2 down the street
is ~$1.80 the alternative the co-op is providing is an outstanding value
even at $2/gal.  :)

James Slayden


On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

 The local pump price for World Energy new soy oil -derived biodiesel fuel
 at Olympian in San Francisco is about $3.35 a gallon or something like
 that. It just went up from a slightly lower price after the soy subsidies
 were cut (?or some such reason).Olympian is a cardlock pump- they are a
 commercial fueling station for fleets, and opened one biodiesel pump.
 Customers pre-pay for a certain number of gallons . I don't remember the
 minumum, but it is a lot I think (Sorry if I'm wrong).  Despite the cost,
 there are 300 cardholders at the moment (source: dave williamson who
 works
 closely with the fuel broker cytoculture)
 At Renner in Northern California (Arcata and Garbervile) I think it's
 around $2.80 or something like that, don't remember exactly. Regular
 petroleum is really expensive there, though (close-ish to $2 a gallon
 sometimes) so it's a relatively good deal if you're the least bit
 enviroconscious. Renner is also a cardlock system, and there's a minumum
 purchase of something like $50 (I also could be wrong on this as well)
 
 Also look at the Yokayo Biofuels website for their rates, that's who a
 lot
 of people in Northern California are getting their fuel from, at lower
 rate
 than the pump above, and that all includes home delivery.
 
 but an important correction to James' post:
 
 Our coop doesn't 'buy' fuel and doesn't sell it- we make our own and we
 do
 tie together reimbursement for equipment/chemicals costs to a per-gallon
 rate for fuel produced, but it is not a purchase. It makes it so that
 people using fuel are not only paying for the costs of making the fuel
 (easy to track as we know what our costs for chemicals are) but also
 helping fundraise for more equipment. We are on a shoestring budget and
 constantly trying to slowly get equipment upgrades (shameless plug:
 anybody
 local got a used transfer pump or a gallon flowmeter to sell us, or some
 used respirator facepieces, or a circulating pump for a solar hot water
 system, or some 3/4 ball valves, or some gasketed drum covers, or a
 cheap
 balance beam scale?).
 
 Reimbursing ourselves per gallon of fuel taken is one way to track it and
 to distribute the costs to the users who are getting the most benefit- ie
 those actually using fuel  (we have lots of members who do not use
 biodiesel yet, or who are in the coop as an educational or biodiesel
 advocacy organization). We don't 'sell' to nonmembers, you have to be a
 member to get fuel at all. What James was referring to is that we do have
 a
 two-tier system for the reimbursement rate (which works poorly at the
 moment). The two-tier rate raises money at a rate either twice or four
 times our chemicals costs per gallon (ie we spend .50/gallon for costs,
 and
 reimburse the co-op $1 a gallon or $2 a gallon, as we have no other
 funding
 source other than very low quarterly dues ($25 every three months). The
 two
 tier rate is partly voluntary (ie the theory is that if you're a
 superpayer/superdonator you get to be in the Canola Club and get a
 55-gallon drum or tank named after you and your name inscribed on the
 wall
 and a little dance done in your honor, or whatever similarly silly honors
 you choose. We have a 350-gallon tote named Dave for Dave Williamson for
 all his help in the project, and one named Randall for Randall Van Wiedel
 (sp??) for finding us the totes for cheap. They missed getting the little
 dance though). The rate is also partly based on whether you worked on the
 particular batch or not. It doesn't work well and is an
 accounting/paperwork nightmare, however, so I wouldn't recommend that
 another co-op or group do this kind of thing.
 Mark
 
 At 09:41 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 Depends on where you get it  
 
 The folks from San Luis Obispo indicated that they were paying $2.85gal
 from a local distributor.  People who are members of the Berkley BD
 Co-op
 pay $1, non-members pay $2.  I have heard pump prices ranging from
 ~$2.35
 to $2.65.  I suppose it depends on feedstock price, the manufactures
 cost,
 the distributors markup, so the mileage may vary.
 
 Also, remember that in Cali it is becoming a hip thing to be using BD
 so
 the price will increase with Envro-Yuppie status.  ;-)  (hrmm, designer
 BD?!!!  My oil is organic and vegan .  hehehehehehe).
 
 
 James Slayden
 
 
 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:
 
   Hi Thor and MM
  
WOW!!  That's news to me.  Where does BD cost around
$1.50?  I pay $2.65/gallon (and believe me, that
hurts).
  
   Sorry Thor, I see that was an 

[biofuel] (fwd) re: Price of BD

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

I received this private email from someone who is in the industry and
apparently is following the price of BD discussion and did some
research on the matter.  

I think others might be interested in their attempts to research this.

It isn't clear to me from their private email if they were sending it
privately because they did not understand procedures of public posting
or because they were trying to be discreet.  But, as I am not a big
participant in the price-of-BD discussion, I think it might be the
former.  So, I am posting their comments (private information
excluded), and then I will show this to them privately as an example
of posting.

MM

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:34:34 +, wrote:

Dear Mr. Murdoch,

I searched high and low for the FOB price of biodiesel and nobody can
really tell me the average price.  They all said it depends.

The US$1.50 price could be a reasonable FOB price for waste oil BD.
If you can land it at $2.85, it may not be too bad when you add all
the costs in freights and handling.

...

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Rent DVDs Online-No late fees! Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XfSp7B/XlOFAA/46VHAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Forest Fights

2002-12-19 Thread motie_d [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm terribly pressed for time, but thought this may be of interest.
A minor correction to Hakan. I live in a National Forest, not a 
National Park.


http://www.reason.com/rb/rb121802.shtml

Best,
Motie


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Building a biodiesel tank

2002-12-19 Thread girl mark

On a homebrewer scale it's not that huge of a deal. On the other hand none 
the processor equipment I currently play with is more than a year old, 
though that equipment isn;t showing any signs of degradation in brass ball 
valves, etc. I've seen much more trouble with plastics leaking at threaded 
connections (due to temperature and eventual distortion) than with metals 
degrading in biodieselprocessing. If you are a large plant with a volume 
much greater than a homebrewer's rig, though, it could be more of an issue. 
Sweat fittings don't seem to be a big problem, though again I haven't done 
all that many of them in my equipment. I don't think you need to weld 
routing plumbing connections. People braze fittings into tanks all the time 
and don't seem to be finding horrible problems with that either. Many 
amateur welders I've met who've built processors have tried some kind of 
epoxy paint or something like that to coat the inside of their tanks as a 
form of insurance against their amateur welding (it's not too easy to weld 
without holes forming, in thin metal like the drums that alot of us use for 
equipment). The paint sometimes sticks and sometimes doesn't, I havent had 
to mess with it.
Also it's mostly not biodiesel itself that's corrosive to metals in 
storage, it's methanol,  lye, and methoxide that are corrosive to some 
metals (aluminum and zinc, I think, though I wouldn't worry too much about 
galvanized metal's zinc content). It doesn't seem to have been a big deal 
for most small scale homebrewers. Again if you're talking much larger 
volume than us (and presumably more money to spend) you may want to do a 
fancier job (ie stainless steel as much as possible), but it hasn't in 
practice been a big problem for the little guys, at least all the ones I've 
met.

Mark



At 11:33 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
I need to find out what metals are impervious to
biodiesel's corrosiveness. Can fittings be
sweated with copper or lead, or should they be
welded with steel wire, should fitting be
stainless steel, brass, copper...etc.

Any help is appreciated.

G

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.comhttp://mailplus.yahoo.com


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlhttp://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread girl mark

I don't know the name of the place, the 1.86 was Yokayo's price per 1000 
gallon a few weeks ago (Last I checked) and the other price is what the 
Ecology Center truck fleet pays for it in 1000 gallon lots, that price they 
told me (they also posted it in some press article or another recently) 
includes the road tax already. Yokayo's 1.86 price is for offroad users- 
non roadaxed. Turns out both places get it from the same plant. that batch 
of ecology center's stuff that we tested in class, by the way- I checked up 
on that with Dave Williamson and he said that it had a pile of additives in 
it that may have affected the emulsification testing (polarpower and a 
biocide). It also may have sat around under poor conditions for a while and 
started to biodegrade despite the biocide (or maybe some other 
factor).  Anyway both places apparently get their fuel from the same plant, 
according to dave.
Mark

At 11:27 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Is that from Imperial?

On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

  Prices I know of are in 1,000 gallon tanks- 1.86 per gallon that way for
  offroad, and 2.35/gallon with the road taxes on the same fuel. Unless the
  1.86 price is outdated (prices on new soy biodiesel went up recently
  around
  here) this is coming from the WVO-derived biodiesel from the plant in
  Coachella CA.
  Mark
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




co-ops was Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread girl mark



At 11:58 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
In the work I do (wireless Internet) we are finding that Tiered cost
structures are also becoming a nightmare to administrate.  It might be
just better if the Co-op just charges everyone $2 and continue to keep the
$25/qrtr $100/yr membership.  Considering that Diesel #2 down the street
is ~$1.80 the alternative the co-op is providing is an outstanding value
even at $2/gal.  :)

James Slayden


Unfortunately it's hard to convince people that on top of the moneyearning 
work they do to get money to pay for fuel at $2 a gallon, and then all the 
hours they put in to getting to the coop site and then making fuel, that 
they should then 'pay' a lot more than it costs to make it for it, 
especially when there;s different tiime commitments and fuel needs coming 
from different members. The ones who don't work on the batches are quite 
happy to donate $2 gallon for fuel occasionally, and those who make it or 
wash it or whatever prefer to spend less money as they're putting in work 
on the fuel and usually on the equipment making while waiting for oil to 
heat or whatever. So it's complicated like everything in life.  (and it 
really is hours that they put in at the coop to get fuel made, for various 
reasons specific to our situation- it'd be more economical if we were in a 
different location and could use larger equipment or had more cash to spend 
to automate a couple of things a la touchless processor or whatever, or if 
could use propane for heating, for example).
  Co-op and other volunteer work involves an interplay between people's 
spirit of volunteerism and the demands on their time- ie how much they have 
to spare. Groovy enviroproject that this all is, a biodiesel coop will only 
work longterm if it fits a primary mission of getting fuel to members 
(believe it or not, that's not our primary mission!). Otherwise, unless 
you're a wingnut like me, it's interesting while you're learning, then it 
quickly becomes a boring routine of hauling buckets of wash water 
(hopefully to be soon replaced with 'pumping wash water back and forth to a 
graywater system' it I hope),  getting dirty, and sitting in meetings. So 
there's got to be (inexpensive in our case) a decent amount of reward for 
members.

Mark


On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

  The local pump price for World Energy new soy oil -derived biodiesel fuel
  at Olympian in San Francisco is about $3.35 a gallon or something like
  that. It just went up from a slightly lower price after the soy subsidies
  were cut (?or some such reason).Olympian is a cardlock pump- they are a
  commercial fueling station for fleets, and opened one biodiesel pump.
  Customers pre-pay for a certain number of gallons . I don't remember the
  minumum, but it is a lot I think (Sorry if I'm wrong).  Despite the cost,
  there are 300 cardholders at the moment (source: dave williamson who
  works
  closely with the fuel broker cytoculture)
  At Renner in Northern California (Arcata and Garbervile) I think it's
  around $2.80 or something like that, don't remember exactly. Regular
  petroleum is really expensive there, though (close-ish to $2 a gallon
  sometimes) so it's a relatively good deal if you're the least bit
  enviroconscious. Renner is also a cardlock system, and there's a minumum
  purchase of something like $50 (I also could be wrong on this as well)
 
  Also look at the Yokayo Biofuels website for their rates, that's who a
  lot
  of people in Northern California are getting their fuel from, at lower
  rate
  than the pump above, and that all includes home delivery.
 
  but an important correction to James' post:
 
  Our coop doesn't 'buy' fuel and doesn't sell it- we make our own and we
  do
  tie together reimbursement for equipment/chemicals costs to a per-gallon
  rate for fuel produced, but it is not a purchase. It makes it so that
  people using fuel are not only paying for the costs of making the fuel
  (easy to track as we know what our costs for chemicals are) but also
  helping fundraise for more equipment. We are on a shoestring budget and
  constantly trying to slowly get equipment upgrades (shameless plug:
  anybody
  local got a used transfer pump or a gallon flowmeter to sell us, or some
  used respirator facepieces, or a circulating pump for a solar hot water
  system, or some 3/4 ball valves, or some gasketed drum covers, or a
  cheap
  balance beam scale?).
 
  Reimbursing ourselves per gallon of fuel taken is one way to track it and
  to distribute the costs to the users who are getting the most benefit- ie
  those actually using fuel  (we have lots of members who do not use
  biodiesel yet, or who are in the coop as an educational or biodiesel
  advocacy organization). We don't 'sell' to nonmembers, you have to be a
  member to get fuel at all. What James was referring to is that we do have
  a
  two-tier system for the reimbursement rate (which works poorly at the
  moment). The two-tier rate 

More BS - Re: [biofuel] Forest Fights

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

I'm terribly pressed for time, but thought this may be of interest.
A minor correction to Hakan. I live in a National Forest, not a
National Park.


http://www.reason.com/rb/rb121802.shtml

Best,
Motie

... by Ronald Bailey, Reason's science correspondent, is the editor 
of Global Warming and Other Eco Myths (Prima Publishing) and Earth 
Report 2000: Revisiting the True State of the Planet(McGraw-Hill).

We talked about him before, remember? When you posted this: Mommy, 
There's A Monster Under My Bed! (A Review Of Global Warming And Other 
Eco-Myths) (Thought Provoking Book Review). Wise Use, stuff, radical 
right anti-environment lobby, corporate-funded but claims to be 
independent, closely linked with all the others and their astroturf 
groups and so on.

There were some responses, to which you replied (below).

Ramjee said this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 Mommy, There's A Monster Under My Bed! (A Review Of Global Warming
 And Other Eco-Myths)
snip

Probably the subject line should have read 'provocative book review!' ;-)

I guess, an Indian edition/context of the book would include a 
lengthy chapter on greed (oops, green) revolution by that 
illustrious agri scientist of India called MS Swaminathan, who is 
the Norman Borlaug's equivalent in India. The cutest thing is that 
this scientist has now started talking about 'sustainable' farming 
etc - probably because, this would get suffient funding, in these 
days of enlightened benefactors! Anyway, a few quotes that I 
harvested are in order here:

Do not become archivists of facts. Try to penetrate to the secret of 
their occurrence, persistently search for the laws which govern them.
-- Ivan Pavlov
It is not necessary to understand things in order to argue about them.
-- Caron de Beaumarchais

So Motie, please forgive Ron Bailey - he knows naught what he is doing. ;-)

Thor said this:

I have read sections of similar publications by Bailey
before.  There is some useful information therein, and
undoubtedly it is always good to hear a different
opinion.  But my impression, after going through the
contents posted at
http://www.nrbookservice.com/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=C5961
is that this publication is largely greenwash, as is
most of what the CEI puts out.

I don't care what experts Bailey has lined up.  You
can always find an expert who disagrees with other
experts.  What is important is that CEI has a strong
ideological grounding, that has nothing itself to do
with science.  They believe in free markets and
limited government.  They pick and choose science to
suit their point of view, not in any quest for
objective truth.

Two examples from CEI's The Environmental Source
2002 at
http://www.cei.org/gencon/026,01623.cfm

1.  on energy policy:
CAFE does not reduce gasoline consumption.
enough said

2.  the section on Agricultural Biotechnology looks as
if it has been written by Monsanto.  Talk about shoddy
science and lack of empirical grounding.  It dismisses
legitimate ecological concerns (laregely by not
mentioning them) about the potential consequences of
introducing GMOs into the environment.  It claims that
labeling of GMO foods will raise the cost of food for
poor people--by how much they don't say, and they
don't mention that it won't raise the cost of food
that DOESN'T contain GMOs. and on and on

What is remarkable about CEI's work is that, although
they extoll the free market, they say nothing about
the role played by corporations (e.g. large market
actors) in influencing public policy and regulation.
You'd think the only ones out there doing lobbying
were misguided environmental organizations and
activist groups.  Also, they selectively promote
consumer welfare; that is, they support the purported
desire of consumers to have the lowest priced goods no
matter what the ecological, ethical, human rights, or
economic impacts of the production, distribution, or
consumption of those products, but they generally
oppose consumer education and choice through labeling
and certification, or anything else that would expose
these impacts or reflect them in pricing.

In short, it's largely a load of crap, but
nevertheless probably an interesting read in parts.

best to all,

thor skov

I said this:

Motie, if you don't mind, this is total BS. Ronald Bailey, FCOL! When
it comes to sheer hard facts, Mr Bailey, the Competitive Enterprise
Institute and Reason Magazine are right up there with Denis Avery,
Michael Fumento, Bjorn Lomborg and, indeed, the one and only David
Pimentel - hooray for these torch-bearers of perverted truth,
talented liars one and all who would save us from ourselves! Sheesh!

The Competitive Enterprise Institute 'postures as an advocate of
sound science in the development of public policy. In fact, it is
an ideologically-driven, well-funded front for corporations opposed
to safety and environmental regulations that affect the way they do
business.' Simply that, spinners one and all, very much including Mr
Bailey:

Ronald Bailey (1993) is 

[biofuel] Fwd: Special Alert -- Don't Delay! Register Now for the Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop

2002-12-19 Thread Keith Addison

From: National Biodiesel Board [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: newsletter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Special Alert -- Don't Delay! Register Now for the 
Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:48:03 -0600

Special Alert÷Donât Delay! Register Now for the Biodiesel Research and
Brainstorming Workshop

If youâre interested in learning about the latest biodiesel research and
technical data from North Americaâs leading experts, register now for the
Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop, January 29-30,2003, in New
Orleans.  Sponsored by the National Biodiesel Board (NBB), the US Department
of Energy, and the US Department of Agriculture, the workshop is a must for
biodiesel researchers and technical personnel, biodiesel fuel suppliers,
engine and fuel injection equipment manufacturers, government agencies
interested in funding biodiesel research and development, and other
stakeholders.

While the final agenda and speakers will remain flexible to help ensure the
latest and best information is shared, the sessions planned for this yearâs
workshop include:
- Recent advancements in improving biodiesel cold flow
properties
- New biodiesel stability test methods and data
- Biodiesel standards with ASTM, the military and the government
- User experience (military, parks, schools, EPACT fleets,
government agencies)
- Biodiesel emissions data (US EPA, CARB, heating oil)
- New engine technology and biodiesel NOx strategies
- Engine data and updates (1000 hour life test results, Original Equipment
Manufacturer input)

ãThe sessions we are planning for this yearâs workshop are substantial and
are designed to maximize the sharing of technical information and practical
experience among participants,ä said Steve Howell, NBB technical director.
ãOur relationship with the engine and fuel injection equipment community has
really grown during the last year, and we anticipate each major engine and
FIE company will send representatives.  This is an area that the industry
made a priority during last yearâs session.ä

If the overwhelming interest in last yearâs brainstorming workshop is any
indicator, those wanting to attend should sign up soon due to a limited
number of registrations.  The deadline for the special discount rate of $139
a night at the beautiful Royal Sonesta Hotel on Bourbon Street in New
Orleans is January 10.  For more information and to register online, visit
www.biodiesel.org.


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: co-ops was Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

Understood.  There is a great sustainable community farm model in Virginia
or Vermont that has susbscriptions for people who are want the produce,
but don't want to participate in the actual labor.  I don't know if they
have a tiered system, but it seems to work well for them.  The article was
in Organic Gardening a while back.  They took some really marginal land
and just completely converted it to a sustainable organic community farm.


James Slayden

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

 
 
 At 11:58 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 In the work I do (wireless Internet) we are finding that Tiered cost
 structures are also becoming a nightmare to administrate.  It might be
 just better if the Co-op just charges everyone $2 and continue to keep
 the
 $25/qrtr $100/yr membership.  Considering that Diesel #2 down the street
 is ~$1.80 the alternative the co-op is providing is an outstanding value
 even at $2/gal.  :)
 
 James Slayden
 
 
 Unfortunately it's hard to convince people that on top of the
 moneyearning
 work they do to get money to pay for fuel at $2 a gallon, and then all
 the
 hours they put in to getting to the coop site and then making fuel, that
 they should then 'pay' a lot more than it costs to make it for it,
 especially when there;s different tiime commitments and fuel needs coming
 from different members. The ones who don't work on the batches are quite
 happy to donate $2 gallon for fuel occasionally, and those who make it or
 wash it or whatever prefer to spend less money as they're putting in work
 on the fuel and usually on the equipment making while waiting for oil to
 heat or whatever. So it's complicated like everything in life.  (and it
 really is hours that they put in at the coop to get fuel made, for
 various
 reasons specific to our situation- it'd be more economical if we were in
 a
 different location and could use larger equipment or had more cash to
 spend
 to automate a couple of things a la touchless processor or whatever, or
 if
 could use propane for heating, for example).
   Co-op and other volunteer work involves an interplay between people's
 spirit of volunteerism and the demands on their time- ie how much they
 have
 to spare. Groovy enviroproject that this all is, a biodiesel coop will
 only
 work longterm if it fits a primary mission of getting fuel to members
 (believe it or not, that's not our primary mission!). Otherwise, unless
 you're a wingnut like me, it's interesting while you're learning, then it
 quickly becomes a boring routine of hauling buckets of wash water
 (hopefully to be soon replaced with 'pumping wash water back and forth to
 a
 graywater system' it I hope),  getting dirty, and sitting in meetings. So
 there's got to be (inexpensive in our case) a decent amount of reward for
 members.
 
 Mark
 
 
 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:
 
   The local pump price for World Energy new soy oil -derived biodiesel
 fuel
   at Olympian in San Francisco is about $3.35 a gallon or something
 like
   that. It just went up from a slightly lower price after the soy
 subsidies
   were cut (?or some such reason).Olympian is a cardlock pump- they are
 a
   commercial fueling station for fleets, and opened one biodiesel pump.
   Customers pre-pay for a certain number of gallons . I don't remember
 the
   minumum, but it is a lot I think (Sorry if I'm wrong).  Despite the
 cost,
   there are 300 cardholders at the moment (source: dave williamson who
   works
   closely with the fuel broker cytoculture)
   At Renner in Northern California (Arcata and Garbervile) I think it's
   around $2.80 or something like that, don't remember exactly. Regular
   petroleum is really expensive there, though (close-ish to $2 a gallon
   sometimes) so it's a relatively good deal if you're the least bit
   enviroconscious. Renner is also a cardlock system, and there's a
 minumum
   purchase of something like $50 (I also could be wrong on this as
 well)
  
   Also look at the Yokayo Biofuels website for their rates, that's who
 a
   lot
   of people in Northern California are getting their fuel from, at
 lower
   rate
   than the pump above, and that all includes home delivery.
  
   but an important correction to James' post:
  
   Our coop doesn't 'buy' fuel and doesn't sell it- we make our own and
 we
   do
   tie together reimbursement for equipment/chemicals costs to a
 per-gallon
   rate for fuel produced, but it is not a purchase. It makes it so that
   people using fuel are not only paying for the costs of making the
 fuel
   (easy to track as we know what our costs for chemicals are) but also
   helping fundraise for more equipment. We are on a shoestring budget
 and
   constantly trying to slowly get equipment upgrades (shameless plug:
   anybody
   local got a used transfer pump or a gallon flowmeter to sell us, or
 some
   used respirator facepieces, or a circulating pump for a solar hot
 water
   system, or some 3/4 ball valves, or some gasketed drum covers, or a

Re: co-ops was Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

Keith,

Looks like some of my email to biofuel@yahoogroups.com is bouncing,
although some are getting through.  Just wanted to let ya know.

James

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, James Slayden wrote:

 Understood.  There is a great sustainable community farm model in
 Virginia
 or Vermont that has susbscriptions for people who are want the produce,
 but don't want to participate in the actual labor.  I don't know if they
 have a tiered system, but it seems to work well for them.  The article
 was
 in Organic Gardening a while back.  They took some really marginal land
 and just completely converted it to a sustainable organic community farm.
 
 
 James Slayden
 
 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:
 
 
 
  At 11:58 AM 12/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
  In the work I do (wireless Internet) we are finding that Tiered cost
  structures are also becoming a nightmare to administrate.  It might be
  just better if the Co-op just charges everyone $2 and continue to keep
  the
  $25/qrtr $100/yr membership.  Considering that Diesel #2 down the
 street
  is ~$1.80 the alternative the co-op is providing is an outstanding
 value
  even at $2/gal.  :)
  
  James Slayden
  
 
  Unfortunately it's hard to convince people that on top of the
  moneyearning
  work they do to get money to pay for fuel at $2 a gallon, and then all
  the
  hours they put in to getting to the coop site and then making fuel,
 that
  they should then 'pay' a lot more than it costs to make it for it,
  especially when there;s different tiime commitments and fuel needs
 coming
  from different members. The ones who don't work on the batches are
 quite
  happy to donate $2 gallon for fuel occasionally, and those who make it
 or
  wash it or whatever prefer to spend less money as they're putting in
 work
  on the fuel and usually on the equipment making while waiting for oil
 to
  heat or whatever. So it's complicated like everything in life.  (and it
  really is hours that they put in at the coop to get fuel made, for
  various
  reasons specific to our situation- it'd be more economical if we were
 in
  a
  different location and could use larger equipment or had more cash to
  spend
  to automate a couple of things a la touchless processor or whatever, or
  if
  could use propane for heating, for example).
Co-op and other volunteer work involves an interplay between people's
  spirit of volunteerism and the demands on their time- ie how much they
  have
  to spare. Groovy enviroproject that this all is, a biodiesel coop will
  only
  work longterm if it fits a primary mission of getting fuel to members
  (believe it or not, that's not our primary mission!). Otherwise, unless
  you're a wingnut like me, it's interesting while you're learning, then
 it
  quickly becomes a boring routine of hauling buckets of wash water
  (hopefully to be soon replaced with 'pumping wash water back and forth
 to
  a
  graywater system' it I hope),  getting dirty, and sitting in meetings.
 So
  there's got to be (inexpensive in our case) a decent amount of reward
 for
  members.
 
  Mark
 
 
  On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:
  
The local pump price for World Energy new soy oil -derived
 biodiesel
  fuel
at Olympian in San Francisco is about $3.35 a gallon or something
  like
that. It just went up from a slightly lower price after the soy
  subsidies
were cut (?or some such reason).Olympian is a cardlock pump- they
 are
  a
commercial fueling station for fleets, and opened one biodiesel
 pump.
Customers pre-pay for a certain number of gallons . I don't
 remember
  the
minumum, but it is a lot I think (Sorry if I'm wrong).  Despite the
  cost,
there are 300 cardholders at the moment (source: dave williamson
 who
works
closely with the fuel broker cytoculture)
At Renner in Northern California (Arcata and Garbervile) I think
 it's
around $2.80 or something like that, don't remember exactly.
 Regular
petroleum is really expensive there, though (close-ish to $2 a
 gallon
sometimes) so it's a relatively good deal if you're the least bit
enviroconscious. Renner is also a cardlock system, and there's a
  minumum
purchase of something like $50 (I also could be wrong on this as
  well)
   
Also look at the Yokayo Biofuels website for their rates, that's
 who
  a
lot
of people in Northern California are getting their fuel from, at
  lower
rate
than the pump above, and that all includes home delivery.
   
but an important correction to James' post:
   
Our coop doesn't 'buy' fuel and doesn't sell it- we make our own
 and
  we
do
tie together reimbursement for equipment/chemicals costs to a
  per-gallon
rate for fuel produced, but it is not a purchase. It makes it so
 that
people using fuel are not only paying for the costs of making the
  fuel
(easy to track as we know what our costs for chemicals are) but
 also
helping fundraise for more equipment. We are on a 

[biofuel] [news]: No beer for Christmas in Venezuela

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=586e=1cid=586u=/nm/20021219/wl_nm/venezuela_dc

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] [news]: No beer for Christmas in Venezuela

2002-12-19 Thread murdoch

ooops, meant to post the text as well

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=586e=1cid=586u=/nm/20021219/wl_nm/venezuela_dc

World - Reuters 
 
Venezuela Court Orders Oil Restart as Strike Bites
1 hour, 7 minutes ago  Add World - Reuters to My Yahoo! 
 

By Patrick Markey 

CARACAS, Venezuela (Reuters) - Venezuela's Supreme Court on Friday
ordered the temporary resumption of oil operations closed by an
opposition strike against President Hugo Chavez that has rattled
markets and caused gasoline shortages in the world's No. 5 petroleum
exporter. 


Reuters Photo 


Reuters  
 Slideshow: Venezuela 

  Anti-Chavez Protesters Take to the Streets 
(AP Video)  
 
  

Nearly three weeks into the strike, lines of several hundred cars and
trucks formed outside some gasoline stations. Others were deserted,
posting No Gas signs, as incredulous Venezuelans faced the prospect
of empty gas tanks. 


The ruling applies until the nation's highest court makes a final
decision on the legality of the 18-day-old oil industry shutdown
launched by the president's foes to force him to resign. It was not
clear when that decision would be made. 


Strike leaders, who have vowed to maintain the stoppage until the
president steps down and calls early elections, said they were
examining the decision. But they were clearly angry. 


This is just more pressure and I think it will lead to more
confrontation, said one dissident executive at the state oil firm
PDVSA, who asked not to be identified. 


The court ordered PDVSA officials to obey government instructions to
guarantee operations in the oil sector that have been virtually shut
down by the strike. Government officials swiftly welcomed the ruling. 


The ruling is very clear. They have to return to work. If they don't
they face severe sanctions, Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel told
Reuters. We hope that they recognize the decision of the Supreme
Court. 


Strikers who disregard the court ruling could face jail for contempt.
Chavez has vowed to fight the strike, using the armed forces where
necessary. 


With Venezuela's oil output now down to less than 300,000 barrels per
day from 3.1 million bpd in November, the stoppage is costing millions
of dollars a day, strangling the lifeblood of an economy already in
steep recession. 


Oil prices hit their highest level in two years on Thursday on
deepening supply shock from Venezuela while Washington readied for war
against Iraq. 


CRUNCH FROM GASOLINE, FOOD SHORTAGES 


Chavez, who was elected in 1998 and survived a coup in April, has
dismissed opposition calls for an early vote. The populist president,
who claims most Venezuelans back his left-wing reforms to ease
poverty, says the constitution only allows a referendum on his mandate
in August. 


Struggling to restart oil exports, Chavez has sacked dissident oil
executives leading the strike and has sent troops to take over idled
state-run tankers, refineries and ports. 


The government has also authorized the military to commandeer ships,
trucks and planes to keep supplies moving. 


But shortages were already being felt, triggering a rush to gas
stations around the country. 


At one Caracas station, drivers had slept overnight in their cars to
secure a place in line. National Guard troops and police broke up
quarrels between motorists as tensions flared over the dwindling gas
supplies. 


With less than a week to go before Christmas, shoppers packed
supermarkets in Caracas to buy up thinning stocks of some basic goods
and customers lined the streets outside banks, which are operating
only during limited hours. 


People are buying nervously. Some supplies got to us today, but we
have no corn flour, wheat flour, soft drinks and other basic
products, said one Caracas supermarket chain manager. If there is no
gas this will get critical. 

But with even beer supplies drying up in South America's largest
consumer of lager and ales, many are preparing for a bleak Christmas.
National sports events have been canceled and television channels have
been cluttered with constant political news coverage. 

We can't get beer anywhere, said Ernesto Otero, a manager of a
Caracas bar. With no baseball, no drink, no horse-racing, no
television and no football ... people are going to protest when there
is no alcohol, even more than about oil. 

Venezuela has been gripped by political conflict since April's coup as
the opposition stepped up a campaign of street protests. His foes
accuse the fiery, outspoken Venezuelan leader of ruining the economy,
stirring class warfare and imposing a communist dictatorship in the
Andean nation. 

Chavez has accused the opposition, an alliance of business groups,
unions and civic associations backed mainly by the middle and upper
class, of trying to destroy his self-styled revolution in favor the
nation's impoverished majority. (Additional reporting by Silene
Ramirez, Ana Isabel Martinez, Ibon Villelabeitia) 
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http

Re: [biofuel] Finding source for SVO

2002-12-19 Thread Craig Pech

How much do you need? Where is it going to? Is soy oil OK?

Craig

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Finding source for SVO


 Hi to all,

 I am looking for some-one in the states for purchase bulk vegetable oil,
for export.

 Regards,
 Damian Dolan





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Going into biodiesel business

2002-12-19 Thread KDe3198534

Hello Evans,

  Where are you located ?

Kevin D.

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE : [biofuel] Forest Fights

2002-12-19 Thread ramjee

At  Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:40:02 -, motie_d [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:

Motie, may I suggest the following?

1. It would be a nice idea to show some consideration to people (like me) with 
flaky Internet connections - like whetting the URL, whether the matter has 
already been discussed, if so what is the prevailing viewpoint, and what 
additional facets of the 'truth' that the article brings about.

 http://www.reason.com/rb/rb121802.shtml 

(am reminded of the old arabic saying - 'dogs bark, but caravans carry on' - 
with due respect to the canines... :-)

2. Though raw bits like what you have posted are okay - it would be nice to 
know *your* opinion on the subject, especially when the issue it rakes up, 
happens to be a very contentious one. Also please note that His Highhandedness 
Ron Bailey's views  are at best known to be white noise. Unfortunately, 
everytime this kind of stuff is posted, it results/may result in one or more of 
the following:
2.1 It generates a backlash (well deserved) but the energy and time of the 
others could be better utilized for composing more *useful* mails rather than 
debunking (for the nth time) the trollish views of a few working for the likes 
of treason.con  ;-) 
2.2 Signal to Noise ratio of the list suffers.
2.3 People like myself have to pay to download mails - which we may not be 
interested in reading in the first place, resulting in exasperation!
2.4 People may killfile these kinds of mails at their mailboxes, so they may 
lose the benefit of reading and getting to know your opinions/views in future...

I'm terribly pressed for time, but thought this may be of interest. 

3. So are most of us, am sure! :-) It would have been nicer on your part to go 
thru the article first and offer your opinion rather than simply forwarding the 
URL that you have come across.

Warm regards:

__ramjee.

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/