Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Leonard
Dan Chisarick wrote: Evil? Immoral? Risky? All of the above. It's called shilling on ebay, and gets you booted'n'banned. Not in favor of it. :) -- Jim Leonard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])http://www.oldskool.org/ Want to help an ambitious games project?

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Dan Chisarick
Not quite. The idea is that no outsider bids on the item. The goal is to get people who have these items to list them when they see the (bogus) selling price, not bilk a poor collector (or wealthy one as the case may be). No one actually pays the 'winning' amount. The only safe way (not

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Leonard
Dan Chisarick wrote: Not quite. The idea is that no outsider bids on the item. Doesn't matter -- it's still deception to raise the price of an item. Just because *that one auction* doesn't sell at the higher price doesn't mean that others won't. It's artificial price fixing. (slaps Dan on

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Stephane Racle
And it goes on every day in a number of industries. :-) Jim Leonard wrote: Dan Chisarick wrote: Not quite. The idea is that no outsider bids on the item. Doesn't matter -- it's still deception to raise the price of an item. Just because *that one auction* doesn't sell at the higher price

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Leonard
Stephane Racle wrote: And it goes on every day in a number of industries. :-) Yes, but that doesn't mean it has to go on in ours. This mailing list has several prominent people of the software collecting movement as members, and I don't think it's a stretch to say that, if we all acted in

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Stephane Racle
I didn't mean to imply that it should, and I'm with you on this. I just thought it was a funny juxtaposition of words: It's artificial price fixing. (slaps Dan on wrist) That is, a lot of white-collar criminals only get a slap on the wrist. Stephane Jim Leonard wrote: Stephane Racle wrote: And

Re: Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread ommail
/04/27 Tue PM 12:15:59 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical? Stephane Racle wrote: And it goes on every day in a number of industries. :-) Yes, but that doesn't mean it has to go on in ours. This mailing list has several prominent people

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-27 Thread Marco Thorek
Jim Leonard schrieb: Stephane Racle wrote: And it goes on every day in a number of industries. :-) Yes, but that doesn't mean it has to go on in ours. This mailing list has several prominent people of the software collecting movement as members, and I don't think it's a stretch to say

Re: [SWCollect] Even marginally ethical?

2004-04-26 Thread Tomas Buteler
It's certainly unethical, but I must confess I'm lured to the idea. Of course I don't really own anything that would loosely fetch those high prices, and wouldn't afford the items that are dug out by the unaware, so I couldn't do anything but watch you guys build up your collections (or fortunes