Hi all
We (Hostpoint) see increasing problems sending automated Mails to bluewwin
recipients (such as account confirmation emails). Respectively we see them
identiefd as spam mails. Can a Swisscom/Bluewin Postmaster please get in touch
with me/us to identify the cause?
Thanks, Michael Naef
On Monday 04 June 2012 22.18:31 Attila Kinali wrote:
Hi Atila
Fill the box with thermally conductive epoxy.
No way to get at the data anymore unless you take a lot of time
to drill a few holes ... but not too deep! ;-)
A good idea. If you do so, make sure you use slow setting epxoy
resin.
On Tuesday 08 November 2011 12:07:44 Schlageter Benjamin wrote:
Hallo zusammen
Hoi Benjamin
Als Verstärkung für unser Engineering Team suchen wir einen
System Engineer. Weitere Infos könnt ihr dem Text entnehmen.
Ich glaube Du hast beim Copy-Paste des Textes von unserer
Ausschreibung den
Hi all
Hostpoint is looking for a system administrator. See the text below
for more information - Sorry for the german-only text. English
speaking candidates are welcome, as well, of course :-)
cheers, Michi
---
Wir (Hostpoint AG, http://www.hostpoint.ch/ ) suchen für den
Standort
On Thursday 11 November 2010 11:08:16 mailinglis...@p-guhl.ch
wrote:
Besides that: How do you make sure (legally) that any of your
e-mails really got through?
Quite a challenge to send an E-Mail to a domain with non-existent
NS and therefor no MX RRs... Or does switch give me a call? Or
Hi all
Hostpoint is looking for a system administrator. See the text below
for more information - Sorry for the german-only text. English
speaking candidates are welcome, as well, of course :-)
cheers, Michi
---
Wir (Hostpoint AG, http://www.hostpoint.ch/ ) suchen für den
Standort
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Guyer, Sven wrote:
[..]
Und scheinbar hat es dieses mal sowieso
zuviele Sales dabei...
[..]
evil
This problem can be solved: The next registration shall be held
only via SQL injection. This will keep out all the salesmen and
otherwise not qualified atendees ;^)
/evil
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Guazzoni Daniele, CH wrote:
[..]
It is the swiss-NETWORK-operator-group, SQL belongs to
sysadmins... I'm more for community-tag based registration over
BGP announcements ;-)
Why have I expected this response :-P
cheers, Michi
On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Claudio Jeker wrote:
[..]
What!?! Email is not realtime?
I guess venty meant ansynchronous versus synchromous (..phone
calls, which is the very distinction between them. A three way
handschake to make sure about something over phones ist much
faster. But just to
On Monday 23 March 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
[..]
People can survive without email
I am tempted to doubt that. The reactions to mail outage suggest
the contrary ;-)
have fun,
Michi
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Hi Christa
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Christa Pfister wrote:
[..]
I would be prepared to do this for free, it wouldn't be a paid
Gutachten, but rather a joint statement by an association of
people who deal with this issues on a daily basis and a lawyer
who has studied this provision in
On Friday 30 January 2009, Peter Keel wrote:
[ISO]
Thou shalt not design protocols by commitee.
Or mapped to the current issue:
Security cannot be declared, one can only try hard and
constantly to implement it.
This is what many, many people don't understand. Especially those
whit lack of
On Wednesday 10. December 2008, Silvan Gebhardt wrote:
do they filter the virgin killer page on Wikipedia?
just curious
citeDie hauptsächlichen Verfasser dieser schwarzen Listen sind
die britische Organisation Internet Watch Foundation
www.iwf.org.uk sowie die schwedische Polizei./cite
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Markus Wild wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, since I didn't make it to last SWINOG...
the description on their web site implies the system is using
BGP to distribute the black list. Assuming this just
distributes IP addresses of web servers hosting questionable
On Wednesday 10. December 2008, Chris Gravell wrote:
Sounds perfectly reasonable. This is not censorship of ones¹
right to be. This is an example of criminality and the onus
would be on UBS et al to negate it.
What a new way of interpreting justice. The acused has to
proove its innocence...
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
[..]
Not very problematic for the mail server but of course the PHP
script does _not_ attempt redelivery. And your users go to
gmail, because there they get the mail. Not sure that's
desirable for you.
This whole discussion is pointless.
Hi Tonnerre
On Friday 17. October 2008, Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
[..]
That's illusionary. Most of the time they don't care about the
one or two customers you at $technically_intelligible_isp
have.
Did you realize that I'm not talking about greylisting but _real_
4xx?
They care about gmail
On Thursday 17. January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr
bei der Firma GPS Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732
99 77.
Hi Firma GPS Technik AG.
***
For your information: You have an autoresponder
Hi Jeroen
On Thursday 17. January 2008, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[..]
Because SwiNOG is one of the only lists that forces a
reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As such, stupid vacation programs
who are subscribed will nicely reply to the list and embarras
themselves there instead of only spamming the
*arrrghhh*
I'll rather not try postmaster. It's probably time to go for a
sleep.
This is the mail system at host mxpolicygw2.as8833.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance,
On Thursday 17. January 2008, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Claus
we have Level 1 listed the IP 195.162.162.159 spamming the
list with it's stupid autoresponder,
so if swinog uses UCEPROTECT-Level 1 the loop should be broken
now.
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Alexandre Suter wrote:
[..]
- the company provided valid contact details, and a working
opt-out mechanism
Which is something you cannot know neither assume. This argument
isn't working for people with only a small computer background.
To bad that judges studied
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Michele Capobianco wrote:
Hey all
Hi Michele
One of our costumers called us and said that he cant send
mails anymore.
After a few Hours checking with ports and stuff it appears
that he cant open a port25 connection to anywhere.
All Firewalls are out now, so
On Tuesday 27. March 2007, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
hi,
Hi Stan
We use the email greylisting policy for incoming email for us
and our customers, and it appears that often the email from
Sunrise network comes with huge delays, from several hours to
several days.
Yeah greylisting... :-)
On Wednesday 14. February 2007 22:15, Bernard Dugas wrote:
Adrian Ulrich wrote:
And why not using the existing authentication protocol on
outgoing smtp server ? So the sender can use the smtp
server of the provider of its email address from any
network and SPF can work without any problem.
On Monday 27 November 2006 20:43, Daniel Kamm wrote:
Graylisting possibly helps as well.
Graylsiting screws up the system E-Mail and doesn't help if the
other end is a regular mailserver (cracked useraccount...).
I think the only long-term reliable means to the solution of this
problem
Hi Daniel
On 9/17/06, Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
Are you sure? Isn't that exactly the point of asymmetric cryptography?
The way I see it, TLS and SSL work like this (analogous to PGP):
[1.2.3.]
Almost. The asymetric encryption is only used to negotiate a symetric
session key
Hi Nico
On 7/26/06, Nicolas Strina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
It's only 2 providers filtering on many others. Downloading for personal use is
not prohibed
till you dont redistribute. Anyway with European law's it will come in all
countries. But
anyway your argument is right for internet
On Friday 11. November 2005 08:17, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
[..]
Add all the autoresponding addresses to the
swinog-autorespond mailinglist and let them have fun
there... ;-)
Cheap neural networks?
Thats one use of a malinglist I haven't thought of by now... god
point! *lol* I allready see
Since those Copy-Protected CDs do not comply with this standard,
Philipps sees a
patent-violation in this.
For once, a patent had something good about it.
It's got nothing to do with patents. It's about the rules of usage
(license) of a trademark (registered compact disc logo).
Michi
30 matches
Mail list logo
