Guys, this conversation turns really funny sometimes.
One says, I have a complex IT and network landscape with hundreds or thousands
devices and business applications, and ipv6 deployment is not justified by
today's needs.
The other goes, nah, forget this crap, I tried ipv6 in my kitchen, and
Michael Krygier wrote:
Any comments about what Drplokta wrote on his blog about Windows Vista
implementing RFC3484 and breaking Round Robin DNS?
It does *NOT* break Round Robin DNS, it breaks the assumption what
people make when they setup their DNS in that manner. Slight difference ;)
Clients
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Michael Krygier wrote:
Any comments about what Drplokta wrote on his blog about Windows
Vista implementing RFC3484 and breaking Round Robin DNS?
It does *NOT* break Round Robin DNS, it breaks the assumption what
people make when they setup their DNS in that manner.
Reza Kordi schrieb:
Do you know if anybody offers a VDSL upstream with BGP dynamic routing?
Customer is in ZUG city.
how evil ... serious: BGP over L2TP dial up infrastructure (yes, xDSL over
BBCS _is_ dialup) should not be implemented. We got several inquiries in the
past years and refused
Fredy, if I remember it right, about a year ago you mentioned that Init7
is deploying the ULL presence?
Regardless of that, the unbundled service is slowly coming to Switzerland, and
soon one may expect TR-069, DHCP based service on the last mile copper. Then
it's
no longer a dialup, but
Thank you all for the cool ideas and even better quotes that I received today.
Of course I understand that some comments were coming from those who are making
their profits specially on BGP interconnects.
If you need BGP buy my expensive LL is the wrong idea pal.
-Original Message-
Stanislav Sinyagin schrieb:
Fredy, if I remember it right, about a year ago you mentioned that Init7
is deploying the ULL presence?
We considered it after doing the ULL pilot, but due to business opportunity
considerations we cancelled ULL (copper) deployments.
F.
Reza Kordi schrieb:
Thank you all for the cool ideas and even better quotes that I received
today.
Of course I understand that some comments were coming from those who are
making their profits specially on BGP interconnects.
If you need BGP buy my expensive LL is the wrong idea pal.
To
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 19:08, Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net wrote:
Remember http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt - in
I just skimmed through that, and i wonder if it's still current.
There's some talk about requiring about 128MB of memory, and budget
concerns of
Hi F,
Can you define the BGP over xDSL will flap way more
What shall I expect here? Did you ever test this as redundancy scenario for
existing BGP environments?
Cheers,
Reza
-Original Message-
From: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] On
Behalf
Lukas Beeler wrote:
[..]
I understand that routers use ASICs and probably faster memory than
servers, but i can't really imagine it to be a problem to pop 4GB
memory into a router that's connected directly to the internet.
Now, where am i mistaken?
The fact that you then also have to handle
Lukas Beeler schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 19:08, Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net wrote:
Remember http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt
- in
I just skimmed through that, and i wonder if it's still current.
Yes it is. Of course BOGONs are outdated, but the
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:08:08 +0100
Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net wrote:
Everybody: please don't offer BGP over DSL polluting the BGP table for CHF
20 or 40 net revenue. There are other redundancy options and backup
solutions using xDSL.
BGP over SDSL works fine. But you shouldn't run BGP
On 05.03.2009, at 19:28, Lukas Beeler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 19:08, Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net
wrote:
Remember http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt
- in
I just skimmed through that, and i wonder if it's still current.
There's some talk about
Lukas Beeler wrote:
Now, even expensive FB-DIMM memory by vendors like HP and IBM only
costs around 360 CHF for 4 GB. And even small two way x86 boxes max
out at around 32 - 48 GB. Even if Cisco and Juniper charge 10x as
much, that'd still be only 3600 CHF.
I understand that routers use
15 matches
Mail list logo
