On 30.09.2004 14:51 Andre Oppermann wrote:
However I not convinced that this was a switch problem. It looks
suspciouly like a spanning tree problem.
Sounds strange, doesn't it? Where is the SPT running on?
Arnold
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL
On 30.09.2004 16:01 Pascal Gloor wrote:
Does anyone or would anyone want to comment on whether the
parties affected are using switches? This sounds like STP
problem, but that is a mere guess as nobody really knows,
it seems.
we do, but we BPDU filter/guard, perhaps the affected ones do
Some of you were asking me how much a FE connection to Frankfurt is. I
don't know but just saw quotes on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ETHERNET TRANSPORT OFFERS:
1. NYC/London, 100 megs FE, MRC = $2K.
2. NYC/LINX, 100 megs FE, MRC = $1K.
3. Miami/NYC, 500 megs GigE, MRC = $5K.
That looks pretty ok ...
Hi all,
it has been a pleasure to attend a SwiNOG meeting and to see you face to
face. Would be nice to have something like SwiNOG also in Germany :-)
Please find my presentation at:
http://www.de-cix.net/info/SwiNOG9-DECIX-presentation.pdf
Regards and see you another time at SwiNOG,
On 15.09.2004 11:40 Guido Roeskens wrote:
Hello,
top-reply is bad, so I'm reordering
but you're doing it as well ;-)
Arnold
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
On 13.09.2004 21:59 Simon Leinen wrote:
So can we finally get rid of the Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] please?
It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should
be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to
all feature when they want to write
On 13.09.2004 23:24 Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
We have the reply-to list since ages. About twice a year a meil goes
wrong, and the embarrassment for the sender is punishment enough. I'd
prefer it to leave it as it is, because reply-to-sender causes
interruptions of the discussion.
1. We do this
On 05.08.2004 22:16 Andre Oppermann wrote:
Do others see the same delay in getting swinog list posts? Or is it just me
because I re-subscribed and got to the end of the distribution list?
Anyway, 20 minutes lag is far too much for such a small list as swinog. For
example the qmail-ldap list
On 04.08.2004 12:04 Michele Marazza wrote:
Arnold,
Joining with what Pascal says, yes, you can wash traffic when you
have some Mbps, not if you have 1Gbps..
you can also wash traffic if it's 1Gbps.
Arnold
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL
Michaele,
On 03.08.2004 15:41 Michele Marazza wrote:
Arnold, Nico,
Let suppose to have Arbor or any other profesional anti-DDos tool and that the
tool tell me: you
have an attack of (almost) 1Gbps towards IP address x.y.z.w. What do you do now? You
still have
hundreds of Mbps coming
On 03.08.2004 17:17 Pascal Gloor wrote:
well ... a better solution is to redirect this traffic at the ingress
point to go thru your washing machine (e.g. Riverhead Guard) and
re-inject the washed traffic into your network.
This works fine, as long as the DoS doesnt excees the ingress
On 26.06.2004 19:03 Pascal Gloor wrote:
I'm looking for a half sized 19'' rack for a fair price (private use, max
150.-).
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=32191item=3489534396rd=1
Arnold
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL
On 25.06.2004 17:03 Daniel Lorch wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you stop this please? Anyone who is interested can either read it
on one of the other lists you post this to, or on the web. We have
managed to live four years without the report on this list and I think
we can continue
On 06.06.2004 20:26 Alexander Koch wrote:
On Sun, 6 June 2004 16:56:25 +0200, Simon Leinen wrote:
[..]
Could you explain why you feel traffic over a 10G port to a public
exchange is harder to secure? E.g. compared to traffic over a 1G
port to a public exchange, or traffic over ten 1G private
On 04.06.2004 11:20 Simon Leinen wrote:
20 Gb/s is impressive! Still it's a bit less than what's shifted at
LINX or AMS-IX:
http://www.linx.net/tools/stats/index.thtml
http://www.ams-ix.net/about/stats.html
For LINX I understand that it must have very high traffic because all
the big
On 04.06.2004 15:17 Neil J. McRae wrote:
But you'd trust the 90+% which LINX claims? (More than 90 per
cent of UK Internet traffic is routed through the LINX exchange, ...)
Over 90% of COLT's UK traffic is transited through the LINX so yes
I do believe that. To be honest though the
On 03.06.2004 00:59 Andre Oppermann wrote:
is someone from bluewin reading this list ?
there seems to be a problem with the www entry of bluewin.ch since yesterday morning
this seems to match with the last mod.
serial = 2004060201
Hmmm... you sound like one of the many customers
On 03.05.2004 17:26 Candid Aeby wrote:
How about this: now shows will sponsor the next beer event ;-) or Dinner?
Just a comment from the outback: why do you complain about SPAM messages
when doing this open castigation? Or maybe I should read the Swinog
charter ;-)
Arnold
On 15.04.2004 01:41 Daniel Lorch wrote:
Sandro Bertschinger wrote:
Yeap, here too, only addresses from switch database.
I didn't get it :( Could someone forward it to me, please?
I've just added
:0 c
* (^X-Spam-Status: Yes)
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to my .procmailrc. Hope that's ok ;-)
On 30.03.2004 09:54 Pascal Gloor wrote:
Hostpoint GmbH is the sponsor of swinog.ch for the next 365 days :-)
Generous ... but what does sponsor of swinog.ch actualy mean? They are
paying the domain registration fee?
Arnold - non Swiss
--
[EMAIL
On 18.03.2004 09:21 Paolo Moroni wrote:
I have just posted the message enclosed below to the CIXP mailing
list. It may be also of interest for some of you. Apologies for the
duplicates and thanks for your attention.
Paolo
Fredy Kuenzler wrote, On 11.12.2003 18:29:
BTW: I'd be retiered 2033 ;-)
Sicher? ... ich richte mich schon darauf ein, direkt vom keyboard in die
Kiste zu springen ;-)
Arnold
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
. Extremely hard?
Cheers,
Viktor
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hermann-Loens-Weg 15 Phone: +49 6224 9259 299
D-69207 Sandhausen Mobile: +49 172 2650 958
Germany
, you
have.. :-)
IIRC it was a student who asked. If it had been a company I would have
send an offer to this hard task in a man week ;-))
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hermann-Loens-Weg 15 Phone: +49 6224 9259 299
D
24 matches
Mail list logo
