Hi Alistair,
I'm new to sword and this thread, so apologies if this has already been
covered, but one thought...
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:54:49AM +, Richard Jones wrote:
Dear All,
Thanks for your extensive feedback on the various issues that we have
been discussing on this list
Hi Folks,
We've now got for you a first draft of the SWORD 2.0 profile of AtomPub,
and you can find it here:
http://swordapp.org/sword-v2/sword-v2-specifications/
The main document here is the Profile, but beneath it I will be adding
the first drafts of the Internet Drafts associated with it
Hi Glen,
I've noticed a couple of things. I'm afraid I'm also new to the list so
apologies if you've already discussed them.
3. Terminology
EM-URI 'The Atom Edit Media URI'
Edit-URI 'The Atom Media Edit URI'
I'm afraid the first sentences for the two definitions got me confused
for a
Hi Ian,
On 15/03/11 11:55, Ian Stuart wrote:
On 14/03/11 21:21, Richard Jones wrote:
I think that a large part of what SWORD adds to AtomPub is how you talk
about packaging. We're definitely not going to go down the route of
specifying package formats or support levels outside of AtomPub's
Hi Folks,
There's been some great discussion on the list this past week or two,
and I thought it might be time for a summary of what looks to me to be a
key sticking point: the scope of sword.
There are two distinct sides to this argument as it's been articulated
on this list:
a) That we
Hi Folks,
Just a quick summary of changes to be made to the profile in the next
version. Did I miss anything?
1/ 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 are incorrect in their description of the usage of
POST on the URIs. This needs to be clarified.
2/ Add a section describing how to use SWORD headers/techniques
Hi Folks,
As the end of this round of the SWORD work draws to a close, we're
looking to cut a release of the profile as the official SWORD 2.0.
There have been very few changes to the document in the past couple of
months, so we are fairly confident in its stability. Some tidying
work is still
