Re: [sympy] Plan for gsoc solvers project ...

2020-03-10 Thread Muhammed abdul Quadir owais
I think the work is also done on set infrastructure with nonlinsolve, linsolve, and solve_decompostion there's no further requirement for this also , if necessary to get more vivid solutions for multivariate should work on this, as I proposed the 2 ways of it ... I want to have opinion on

[sympy] Discussion with Mentor Phase Question

2020-03-10 Thread Phúc Ngô
Hello everyone, my name is Jerry and I'm really interested in contributing to Sympy for GSoC right now. I know I'm a bit late for the proposal discussion right now but I don't know if our organization would be flexible about the discussion phase or not? In the timeline, it said that the

[sympy] project proposal for solvers in sympy

2020-03-10 Thread Shadaab Ghani
Hello, I am a masters student in Chennai Mathematical Institute (currently in my first year) I am interested in taking up the solvers issue, for my rough project timeline 1st months i will spend on extending transolve to : - Lambert type equations (PR #14972

Re: [sympy] GSOC'20

2020-03-10 Thread Aaron Meurer
Which project you apply for will be up to you, but I would note that the SymEngine project requires C++ and the Live and Gamma projects require experience with web development. Aaron Meurer On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:34 PM Sanjiban Sengupta wrote: > > Hello everyone, This is Sanjiban Sengupta,

[sympy] GSOC'20

2020-03-10 Thread Sanjiban Sengupta
Hello everyone, This is Sanjiban Sengupta, from India, interested to contribute to SymPy for GSoC'20, i have gone through the documentations and usages of SymPy module, and being a Computer Science student found it very helpful in symbolizing mathematical expressions, thus already having the

[sympy] Gsoc 2020 mentor help required

2020-03-10 Thread VISHAKHA NARANG
Dear Sir, I Vishakha Narang, an undergraduate student pursuing B.Tech in Computer Engineering from Cummins College of Engineering. I have advanced skills in programming languages like C++, Java, Python, HTML, CSS, XML and beginner level skills in many other languages. I

[sympy] Regarding Risch algorithm

2020-03-10 Thread Prakhar Saxena
Hey Aaron Meurer, My name is Prakhar Saxena. I am a second year undergraduate student at Indian Institute of Technology Varanasi. I have a fair experience of coding in python. I have studied abstract algebra, calculus and mathematical methods during my first and second year. I would like to

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC idea about ODE

2020-03-10 Thread Oscar Benjamin
Hi Mohit, You don't need to resend the previous emails. This discussion is becoming too detailed though and belongs on the Github issue for refactoring the ODE module: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/18348 Oscar On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 15:26, mohit balwani wrote: > > hello, > > so should

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project | Discussion | Implementation of Functors in the Category Theory module

2020-03-10 Thread Vatsal Srivastava
Any help/views/suggestions on the above discussion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and regards, Vatsal. On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 03:13 Vatsal Srivastava, wrote: > Typo: we *need not* provide the functor the explicit map, but just the > field and the set S. > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 03:11

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC idea about ODE

2020-03-10 Thread Oscar Benjamin
Hi Mohit, I'm replying on the mailing list. I didn't realise we had gone off-list in the last couple of emails. This conversation belongs in the issue on github. Oscar On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 13:29, mohit balwani wrote: > > For pattern matching, I kept in mind that we can extract the elements

Re: [sympy] Re: Profiling lagrange.py

2020-03-10 Thread Dhruv Mendiratta
I wanted to get an idea on how to carry out the project 'Efficient equation of motion generation' and hence wanted to find bottlenecks in the codebase, specifically the mechanics package. And as Mr. Jason Moore pointed out in an other email thread that things could be sped up by improving

Re: [sympy] My raw application layout

2020-03-10 Thread vinit wadgaonkar
As I mentioned earlier this rough estimate implementation of Newton eurler methods can take up to 4 weeks so this plan naturally gets extended upto 11 weeks or more please guide more through this topic but can i work on this topic On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 16:02 vinit wadgaonkar, wrote: > As I

Re: [sympy] My raw application layout

2020-03-10 Thread vinit wadgaonkar
As I mentioned earlier this rough estimate implementation of Newton eurler methods can take up to 4 weeks so this plan naturally gets extended upto 11 weeks or more please guide more through this topic but can i work on this topic On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 16:01, vinit wadgaonkar wrote: > but can

Re: [sympy] My raw application layout

2020-03-10 Thread vinit wadgaonkar
but can i work on this topic On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 09:18, vinit wadgaonkar wrote: > As I mentioned earlier this rough estimate implementation of Newton eurler > methods can take up to 4 weeks so this plan naturally gets extended upto 11 > weeks or more please guide more through this topic > >

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC idea about ODE

2020-03-10 Thread mohit balwani
Hi, currently, there are 28 solvers in the ODE module out of which 6 solvers have been refactored already. I have classified the remaining 22 solvers on the basis of their parent class whether they should inherit SinglePatternODESolver or SingleODESolver SinglePatternODESolver 1. separable